Talk:.nyc

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can it fail to be notable

Thanks for the rescue job. I've been following this story for some years (the video EL's are mine). As one of a handful of City TLDs likely to be delegated under ICANN's new rollout I don't see how it can fail to be notable. That said, the City's trumpeting of "approval" while reliably reported is a jumping of the gun somewhat. The .nyc tld has passed initial valuation - it is yet to be approved. It is assumed by the City and Neustar that the rest is a formality, but there are a few hoops yet. For instance, in a recent appearance in NYC the NTIA's Larry Strickling, in response to a question (17:10), spoke of not renewing .us with Neustar due to a lack of multistakeholderism in its management. Similar objections could yet arise w.r.t. .nyc. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://livestream.com/internetsocietychapters/video?clipId=pla_3b920184-f5b7-4da0-b0fc-ac870008f59b is dead. 74.71.192.180 (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ICANN Community objections

There was some back and forth in the ICANN community objection process. It isn't mentioned in the article thus far, but it can be found here. Wwwhatsup (talk) 13:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advisory Board

I have just noticed that Tom Lowenhauopt extensively documented the Advisory Board's activities on the Coactivate website. https://www.coactivate.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/community-advisory-board is the depature point. This should be digested and added to the article. Wwwhatsup (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.coactivate.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/community-advisory-board is dead. 74.71.192.180 (talk) 22:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]