Talk:.338 Federal

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .338 Federal article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have requested permission from Gun Blast to use an image they have of the .338 Federal. If permission is granted, I will upload their image. Kartano (talk) 04:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission was obtained, have uploaded the image and forwarded permission to Wiki. Kartano (talk) 05:03, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Velocity given for 180 gr bullet in 308 is at least 100fps too high! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lance may (talk • contribs) 03:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Velocity for .308 updated to 2600 fps as per factory loads, despite much better performance with handloads. --CaboverPete (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Photograph is not labeled, and from the neck angles, they look to be 3 different rounds.Fremry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.191.41 (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph now labeled, identifying each cartridge individually. --CaboverPete (talk) 20:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accuballs?

So the table that compares ballistic performance between the 338 federal and the 358 Winchester has a bullet listed as “accuballs”. I don’t know if this was a spellcheck error or on purpose, I know of no bullet named “accuballs”. I do know of a bullet by Nosler called an accubond. Help me out here and correct this if it’s wrong.

I don’t know how to correct a table. Anthonyjoehaynes (talk) 06:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]