Talk:.17 Remington
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .17 Remington article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Military History (not)
[edit]I'm just curious how this relates to military history, I was unaware of any military use of this cartridge. Thanks for the info. Arthurrh 17:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC) Removed Military History tag - it was incorrect. Arthurrh 17:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Minor reference error.
[edit]The text calls out use of the .223 Rem as the basis and is necked down... ok - fine. The specifications on the right state parent is .222
I think the .222 is in error. Martin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.92.36.106 (talk) 03:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)