Talk:Žumberak Mountains

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovenia Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 37 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Moving

Moved this back because 'Ž' isn't in ISO-8859-1. Morwen 12:12, May 21, 2004 (UTC)

If the Slovenians call it Gorjanci more often than Žumberak, perhaps we should move it altogether? IIRC, a bit more of the mountain is in Slovenia than it is in Croatia. --Joy [shallot] 20:39, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I went ahead and moved it to a compromise title, seeing how the names are really equivalent. I kept Žumberak in the first place primarily for backwards compatibility. --Joy [shallot] 14:59, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No problem. If I recall correctly, IIRC stay for If I recall correctly :)? --andrejj 15:32, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Yes :) --Joy [shallot]

I think that actual name of mountain is Žumberačka gora not Žumberak (according to my map)?

It is aj ;) --andrejj 20:04, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's used interchangeably. --Joy [shallot] 20:32, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Žumberačka gora

This should be on Žumberačka gora/Gorjanci? What about splitting on two articles Žumberačka gora and Gorjanci? --AndrejJ (talk) 05:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why should we split? Is this not the same geographic entity? --Eleassar ^{my talk} 09:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

German name

It is irrelevant IMHO. After all Zagreb was Zágráb, Agram or Zagrabia in history, but none of them mentioned ;-) --AndrejJ (talk) 05:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Rifleman 82 (talk) 22:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Žumberak/Gorjanci → Žumberak — Per WP:Naming conventions (landforms). The name Žumberak is simply more prevalent in English sources.[1], [2], [3] Eleassar ^{my talk} 09:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mild support - it's not really ideal, as the usage is not overwhelmingly one or the other - both seem to be common in English. However, the present article title does not meet naming conventions (just as we don't have an article called Colour/Color, so we shouldn't have a slashed title here either). So we may as well go with the slightly more used name, but making sure all else is neutral - in Slovenian articles refer to it as Gorjanci, in Croatian as Žumberak and make sure both titles are mentioned in the lede. — Amakuru (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I just don't see a compelling argument. The cited guideline does not actually proscribe the current solution and I don't see anyone complaining about the ordering (asking to put Gorjanci first). A general Google search for English-only results for "Zumberak -Gorjanci" and then one for "Gorjanci -Zumberak" is inconclusive. A Google Books search - ditto. Just leave it be unless someone actually has a real argument against the current title form. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Get rid of the slash for aesthetic and naming convention reasons. Either name is fine with me. — AjaxSmack 17:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per Alex. This sort of situation arises with many articles, and Wikipedia's solution is to pick just one of the names as the article title. I don't see any reason to do differently here.--Kotniski (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Who's Alex? Jafeluv (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good question (another one for Gompie to ask, perhaps?) Sorry, per Ajax (and others).--Kotniski (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to either Žumberak or Gorjanci. It's an unfortunate situation when we have to choose between two common variants of a name, but I don't think trying to use both names is a solution. As Amakuru said above, we should pick one form as the article title (ideally the one that's most common in English), make a redirect from the other name, and encourage editors to use the correct variant in different contexts. Jafeluv (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 20 May 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 14:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Žumberak → Žumberak Highlands – Per WP:ENGLISH: this is an established English name of the entire highlands, Žumberak being only a part of it. Eleassar ^{my talk} 23:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Žumberak Mountains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090615214451/http://www.javno.com/en-croatia/slovenia-is-occupying-croatian-land-in-sveta-gera_236361 to http://www.javno.com/en-croatia/slovenia-is-occupying-croatian-land-in-sveta-gera_236361

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]