Talk:Ðàn tre
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Ðàn Tre)
It is requested that an pronunciation audio be included in this article to improve its quality.
A Free Pronunciation Audio Search Tool may be able to locate suitable audios on non-copyrighted web sites. |
A fact from Ðàn tre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ðàn Tre. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 00:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Ðàn Tre uses an olive oil can to make music? This might make a good quirky hook.(?) Source: https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/minh-tam-nguyen-s-%E2%80%98%C3%90%C3%A0n-tre-bamboo-musical-instrument-minh-tam-nguyen/GAGYWF62_XJuKA
- ALT 1 ... that the Ðàn Tre uses an olive oil can and a bamboo tube to make music? Source: https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/minh-tam-nguyen-s-%E2%80%98%C3%90%C3%A0n-tre-bamboo-musical-instrument-minh-tam-nguyen/GAGYWF62_XJuKA
- Reviewed:
- Comment: QPQ not needed
Created by Schminnte (talk). Self-nominated at 01:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - just a question.
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @Schminnte: Good article. Though, what makes weekendnotes a reliable source? Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Nothing! That slipped past me sorry. I have replaced the reference with a much better one from the Royal Albert Hall. Thanks for spotting that. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 22:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Onegreatjoke has not returned after six days while actively editing. The new reference is fine. Approving. SL93 (talk) 01:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Incomplete sourcing
[edit]@Schminnte: The source in Reference #1 does not have page numbers. Any chance you can provide those? DHN (talk) 23:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
There, that's done now. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 08:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)