Talk:Étienne Dolet

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 08:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

With due respect to the efforts being given to add page numbers from the 1911 EB source, this article remains plagiarism start to finish. One cannot simply cut and paste content from another author/source, absent quotation marks, simply because it is out of copyright protection. This content was written by another or others, and not by a Wikipedia editor internalising and processing the content intellectually, after which a paraphrase or other unique presentation followed. This material is cribbed essentially verbatim (apart from the stray edit like mine, removing parentheses no longer the modern style). If material from the 1911 is used, it must be rewritten, citing the source. Cut and past cribs are intellectually dishonest, and set the wrong example for attentive academic readers. FInally, the page number additions are lipstick on what is a quite repugnant, odoriferous pig. 2601:246:C700:558:3042:6785:B657:CDD8 (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]