Talk:Æthelhere of East Anglia/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk · contribs) 12:15, 4 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I was born and live in East Anglia, so I'll review it; article looks great
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- I'm not sure if this article is in American English or British English; the date reads "November 15" (American way to write dates), but the word reads "favour" instead of "favor"; or is it supposed to read "15 November" (British way to write dates)? and wy does it use the word "slain"? it's better to sound consistent and boring and use the word "killed" or "murdered"
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- fine
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- fine
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- fine
- C. No original research:
- fine
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- fine
- B. Focused:
- fine
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- fine
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- fine
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- fine
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- fine
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Good job, it's a pass
- Pass or Fail: