Talk:¥€$

This article was nominated for deletion on Date. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Estonia Low‑importance

¥€$ is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles)
Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it
Maintain : Portal:Estonia
Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia)
Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class.

Requested move 11 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. The opposition arguments based upon WP:TITLETM are persuasive. (closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 15:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

¥€$ → Yes (Tommy Cash album) – While most reliable sources use these three symbols to refer to Tommy Cash's album, Wikipedia generally dislikes this sort of stylism in article titles. 162 etc. (talk) 07:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 23:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. These types of stylizations don't belong in the article title. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support no need for stylized nonsense, per MOS:TMSTYLE—blindlynx 20:05, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the way Tommy Cash is titled, also Kesha and Pink (singer) are not titled "Ke$ha" and "P!nk" respectively. Therefore I agree with this nomination. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question, are there sources calling it "Yes" (or even YES)? Because both WP:AT and MOS:TM explicitly ask us to not invent names. Just because Ke$ha and P!nk are not stylized (because there are multiple sources that don't use the stylization), it doesn't mean that every article has to follow that guideline (i.e. Deadmau5, Sunn O))) et. al). (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:27, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And coupled with the fact that we should not invent names, AT furthers goes at WP:COMMONAME with "Wikipedia [...] generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources) as such names will usually best fit the five criteria listed above". If the existing sources are not assuming this subject is actually named "Yes" (phonetical transcription is not relevant for AT), then we should not prescribe such usage as it is incorrect. "Wikipedia does not lead, Wikipedia follows" is a principle. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A good point. While there are sources that use "YES" [1] [2], these aren't what I'd consider particularly reliable. 162 etc. (talk) 15:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a title formatting issue, so how sources choose to stylize the title don't really matter, just like our title formatting convention about not capitalizing short prepositions in article titles regardless of what sources do. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose While some may view the title as "nonsense" what matters is what reliable sources say (and the nom says most reliable sources use ¥€$). I would also point out that it is not uncommon for us to use icons in the titles of albums, see ÷ (album) or $O$. AusLondonder (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those examples should both be moved also. Stylized symbols like that being used as stand-ins for letters or words don't belong in the article title. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per naming conventions. The title of the album is clearly a stylisation of the word "yes", not literally "yen-euro-dollar". JIP | Talk 19:51, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The arguments for this move are not really engaging with the meat of the relevant policy, WP:TITLETM, which says Article titles follow standard English text formatting in the case of trademarks, unless the trademarked spelling is demonstrably the most common usage in sources independent of the owner of the trademark (emphasis added). Per Tbhotch's line of questioning above (and even the nom statement!), the current title, stylized nonsense or no, seems to meet that requirement. Colin M (talk) 19:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
0ÞÞ0$€ per Colin M. WP:TITLETM seems pretty darn clear on this. Dohn joe (talk) 16:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose WP:IDONTLIKEIT voting doesn't make policy sections that explicitly tolerate or even recommend stylizations, as long as the appropriate sources use them predominantly, suddenly disappear. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.