Talk:Salem's Lot (2004 miniseries)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Request for title change

I guess I don't have the privilege to change the title of the page itself but the title of the miniseries starts with an apostrophe, just like the novel. Other sources, like IMDb, have it wrong too. The title is displayed thusly in both the opening and end credits of the miniseries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.20.177.231 (talk) 01:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I removed this second paragraph, because it is not only uncited, but i'm not sure the tone is neutral. and some if it is interpretation based on other works that may not be pertinant to this entry. here is the original paragraph is someone wants to edit or cite it properly:

The movie received mixed reactions from both critics and fans. Most praised the lavish production values and the casting, but many were put off by the major changes to both the novel's plot and characters. For example, Father Callahan, rather than being the tragic character whose faith fails him, now turns into Barlow's new apprentice after Straker is slain. At this time the fifth Dark Tower novel, Wolves of the Calla, had come out, which featured the return of Father Callahan's character and the start of his redemption. Some were also critical of some of the unnecessary attempts to modernize the story, with the inclusion of cell phones, etc.

--65.113.35.130 (talk) 23:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Burke

I changed the "Deviations" page previously and it was changed back for some unknown reason. In the book, Matt Burke is also gay, it's just not a major plot point of the novel. It isn't stated clearly, but it's there; there is a passage stating that nobody cared about Burke's lifestyle as long as he didn't demonstrate it in town.

I just removed that part again, also the part about Marjorie Glick's bite being 'cured' by a tetanus shot. Its in the book, if you look for it. Leafschik1967 18:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the book I didn't personally believe that Matt Burke was supposed to be gay, but that people in a small nosey town would think that. Afterall he was an interlectuall who lived alone, but I don't necessarily think that made him gay. When Ben tells him not tell anyone about Mike Ryerson he says something along the lines of 'The fact you live alone and unmarried will probably make them think we're a couple of queers getting our kicks'. We'll discuss it further before I add anything to the discrepencies. ArdClose (talk) 02:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Headline text

Fair use rationale for Image:Salems lot cap.jpg

Image:Salems lot cap.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mini Series?

Are you sure this is a mini series? I have a DVD with everything the same (character actors, story, cover etc). It was filmed mostly in the little town of Creswick. It isnt split into a two part series on the DVD. Am i posting in the wrong section? provide a link to redirect to the movie if i am wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.139.45.249 (talk) 10:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was aired over a span of two days when it premiered and was advertised as a miniseries.--CyberGhostface 03:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you watch the DVD you will see a part where there was clearly meant to be a break (i.e. showing Ben back in the hospital with the orderly, and then recapping the basic stroy). ArdClose (talk) 01:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

Anyone else think that maybe the cast page could be done a bit better? I don't really think guys like Dr. Cody and Mark Petrie have 'cameo' roles in the script. Leafschik1967 18:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe "supporting" would be better?--CyberGhostface 04:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diviations

I cleared this section up a bit...I think it was a tad misleading and some pieces of info were a bit gratuitous. I wasn't particularly sure about the 'Kurt Barlow gets younger and younger' part, but I left it there for benifit of the doubt. I know these kind of sections are difficult to keep snappy, as it's hard to tell where to draw the line between what's relevent and what's not, but the way the story was adapted I tried to cluster things up a bit. ArdClose (talk) 01:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rutger Hauer

I removed a reference to Rutger Hauer having previously played Dracula in "Dracula III"

That movie came out a full year after 'Salem's Lot! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.236.175.98 (talk) 14:37, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apostrophe in title

How come there is a ' at the start of the title? Bob talk 13:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rutger Hauer named?

There is a section wherein Lowe reflects on Hauer's performance in SL. However, I have read Lowe's books, and he does not note the actor by name. Because he did not, we cannot. If we dom it's Synthesis. I'll wait about a week before removing it as per WP:SYN. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]