Jump to content

Talk:'Atara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:12, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atara-Thaer Atary.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Atara-Thaer Atary.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Atara-Thaer Atary.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merging sections

[edit]

@Al Ameer son: I know you like to merge sections, but I really wish you didn`t: It is much easier to edit with smaller sections. And I *do* intend to expand on the "modern" stuff; however, my priorities have been expanding the "old" stuff, first, Huldra (talk) 21:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Huldra: I'm largely basing the subsection structure on those of most good articles about localities and past experience. The article looks neater with less stubby sections. I agree that smaller sections are easier to edit, but this is much too small. The thing is, until you or I or anyone else fleshes out these sections whether it's tomorrow or years from now, these articles will likely be read by hundreds if not thousands of people in the meantime, so the article should always appear neat and follow MoS. I kept the British Mandate period separate from the post-Mandate material because it appears large enough on its own, but the "1948-1967" and "post-1967" subsections were merged for the obvious reason that both of these sections combined are essentially a couple of sentences, half of which are general statements that pertain to the entire West Bank. Moreover, the Jordanian period was a little more than 15 years so unless there's substantial material about Atara during that period, I don't see a situation where a subsection for that time period is warranted. Personally, I think modern-era populations statistics belong in a Demographics section because it shows the increase and decrease of the population of the village through the decades. --Al Ameer (talk) 22:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Perhaps this conversation should be taken to the talkpage of WP:Palestine (hopefully it's still relatively active) because this subject thread pertains to nearly all of the articles on Palestinian towns and villages. --Al Ameer (talk) 22:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 'Atara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 'Atara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 'Atara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ad-Darieh = Atara

[edit]

Conder and Tristram, while looking for biblical Ataroth, mention a place they call (Khirbet) Ed Darieh or Atara, near Lower Bethoron and 2.5 miles north of "Ramah". Can it be this? A bit too far from Lower Bethoron (c. 15 km straight line) to be called near imo, and was Ramah in Benjamin = Ramallah in their 19th-c. opinion? (Now they think it's al-Ram.) If so, again a bit too far (2.5 m = c. 4 km). But if indeed the same: (Khirbet) ed-Darieh must be mentioned as an alternative name, and we also have a name overlap with the Nabataean Khirbet ed-Darieh/Kh. edh-Dharih. A technicality, but needs to be kept in mind & sorted out. Arminden (talk) 23:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same according to what modern mentions I can find. Zerotalk 03:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]