Jump to content

Portal talk:Music/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Criticism of the news

What do those news have anything to do with music?! They have more to do with celebrity life.--Deadworm222 13:30, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Message board

Does this portal has any message board or local willage pump? mikka (t) 20:25, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

That would be this talk page, I guess. Or? / Habj 00:23, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Anniversary pages

I'd like to recommend making an aniversary subpage for every month. That way they can be edited as needed without loosing info. The month variable could be used to control the display, thus making it work automagically. The code would look something like this: 

{{Portal:Music/box-header|Anniversaries|Portal:Music/Anniversaries/{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}|}}
{{Portal:Music/Anniversaries/{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}}}
{{Box-footer|}}

The "current" month of October would be kept at Portal:Music/Anniversaries/October for example. (I've copied the text to that page as an example and for the other existing months.).

And here it is implemented:

edit  

Anniversaries

All months: January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December Thoughts? Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 12:51, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

  • This works really well. I think we should also have something like this for the Featured Article like some other portals do. Madder 23:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Did you know

Do the rules for this main Wikipedia:Did you know apply to other DYKs such as this portals (Portal:Music/Did you know)? Hyacinth 09:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

To a certain extent, yes, but obviously there's not enough interest in this page right now to update the section every five days, for example. What specific policies are you referring to? TheJabberwock 02:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, is it normal for redlinks to be present on Portal:Music? How is this different from the Main Page?

The Franz Xavier Wolfgang Mozart has been fixed, but there are a few others... --Folajimi 15:59, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

To-do

What became of the to-do list? Is the Portal done with to-do lists?

Just curious, --Folajimi 01:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

French Music Portal

The French Music Portal totally rips this portal to shreds. Can we rip them off? Madder 19:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Improving the portal

The portal definitely needs updating. Regarding the featured article, which hasn't been changed in over 3 months, I was wondering how a featured article was chosen? Perhaps a list should be drawn up here, and a new featured article put up every month?

Also, about the introduction, which comes across as a bit stern, especially compared with the introduction of the French Wikipedia's Music Portal, which was a featured portal there. I think we should use their introduction, which is:

What is music?
Music is an art and at the same time a science.
It is an art since from the dawn of time, humanity has known music. In magical incantations, in ritual dances, etc.
It is a science since it is restricted by norms and scientific and mathematical rules.
In all communities, there exists an ancient and traditional music alongside a music which is taught in schools and conservatoires.
But whatever its nature and audience, music touches us and moves us, it makes us think and it makes us dream.

(Cue soppy violin music). I think this introduction is great, and I think we should use it. Madder 19:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

  • I concur with your idea of adopting their format/framework. The teal look definitely works for me. Perhaps we should push for making it the official colour for Music-related templates?
    • There seem to be disparate pages for requests regarding music-related articles. At the moment, I have yet to come up with a plan for how to pull these pages into the portal, but I think it will be a worthwhile endeavour. Besides, I am somewhat disturbed by the amount of listcruft which has crept into those pages over time. Any thoughts? Folajimi 20:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
      • I've already improved the visual appearance of the portal, but I certainly think we could make it look even nicer. I agree the portal needs to be made more useful and become a proper hub for music-related articles on Wikipedia.Madder 21:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
        • How about a new segment for "On this day in music history..."? --Folajimi 23:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
          • That sounds good, but quite similar to 'Anniversaries'? Also, should we revamp the introduction as mentioned above?
Regarding the featured article section I think it would be a good idea to have a 12 month cycle, the same as what the Anniversaries section uses. People could suggest articles here, and then a list could be drawn up for the next 12 months, with one article every month - or if there are more suggestions, perhaps even more frequently. Madder 23:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • To the pair of questions you asked up front, my answer is yes. As for the proposed cycling scheme. I would look for notable events to include as soon as I can find them.
Regarding birthdays, I have a suggestion – there is a rather lengthy list of birthdays for musicians I have stashed somewhere. Is it possible to have a subsection or subpage for birthdays? I would like to have them included as well. --Folajimi 00:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • There are a few birthdays mentioned in the anniversaries section which rotates, but that's only for every month. We could definitely have a seperate section for birthdays, and use a rotation system, and maybe integrate it with the "On this day in music history...", which has a nice ring to it. I don't know how many birthdays you have, but if it's one a week, that would mean creating one page for every week. The system would automatically rotate through the pages.
About the proposed cycling scheme, I mean about the featured article - is that what you mean by notable events? Madder 00:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Perhaps I misinterpreted what you meant; I just realized that the featured article has nothing to do with the month. Either way works for me.
As for birthdays, there are probably four a day... --Folajimi 00:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • You need to create a page for each day with corresponding birthdays, the page should be located as follows:
Portal:Music/Birthdays/TheMonth/TheDay
So for example, the page listing birthdays on the 21st of August would be at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Music/Birthdays/August/21
We can then add code on the portal main page to use the page for whichever day it is.Madder 00:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • It seems like I've got my work cut out for me; I have no idea how many of the subjects will be red links. It will take a while, to be sure... --Folajimi 01:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Suggest a Featured Article

I've set up a page for suggesting featured articles, which is also linked to on the portal main page - it's at Portal:Music/Featured_articles/Suggest. A template is also included to be added to the talk pages of candidate articles. If you know of any note-worthy music-related articles that you believe should feature on the music portal, please add them here. Madder 01:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

New colors

Any opinions? Λυδαcιτγ 19:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

I was just about to post about that when I got an edit conflict from this :-) The changes you've made are great, including the new system for news which looks much better. I'm not too sure about the colours though, I think the lighter blue colours we had before were more visually appealing and in general made things a lot clearer. The darker blue colours distract from the text itself. Madder 19:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Template proposal.

It seems that Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums have an album template, which is being used on several recordings site-wide. However, I have found the colour scheme selected for "Original albums" — orange — hurts my eyes.

I have posted a note on that project's talk page about the possible adoption of a different colour for that template. Hopefully, they will accept using a colour that is easier on the eyes, such as the one used for this page. This will help avoid duplication of effort. --Folajimi 20:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Adding the Music Portal to the Portal browse bar

Music is such a large subject, I think it would make sense to add the Music Portal to Template:Browsebar which appears on each portal. What do you think? Madder 17:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't think it would be a very popular addition. I think Browsebar is for the very top-level groups only. Λυδαcιτγ 22:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Important Articles

Perhaps this section on the portal should be merged with the Categories section - the French Music Portal has done this, where they list each Music Category with its most important articles. They also have some good images which we could use. Madder 22:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Folajimi 00:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
For now, I simply merged the two. The French idea should definitely be taken into consideration. Λυδαcιτγ 04:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Death

There are a ton of personalities who died this month; I've only added a few of those I am aware of. How about having a separate section for them? --Folajimi 23:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Bit of a grim section to have! Madder 15:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Perhaps an obituary section would be a bit much... Anyway, the Anniversary section will probably be fine. In that case, it would be best to include information only on the "terminally unique" — the most famous or obscure, or those who died as a result of freak accidents, suicide, etc. --Folajimi 16:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
      • I'm also a bit worried about the use of the word 'Vital' and 'Important' in the Important topics section - some people might argue that those particular articles/categories aren't the most important/vital... it depends what you're looking for that will determine how important it is to you. Should it be rephrased perhaps? Madder 19:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Problems with Suggest a featured article

The Suggest a featured article page seems to be getting little attention - there hasn't been a single vote on either of the two nominations there since it started. Is there any way of sorting this? Or will dictatorship just have to be used for the final decision for July's featured article? Madder 22:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Missing image.

The image at the head of the portal is missing. At least, it appears to be so in the browser I'm using... Folajimi 00:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Which browser? It shows up in Firefox, Windows 98. Λυδαcιτγ 22:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
MoMo (Seamonkey), Gentoo. --Folajimi 23:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
The image is located at http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/93/Music_Portal_Banner.jpg so see if you can view it there. By the way, if you're using AdBlock, that's probably the reason. And I recommend Firefox. Madder 22:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps the issue is specific to MoMo; even dillo seems to load the page properly w/o issues. Folajimi 03:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Problem with Date of Birth section

Just noticed there's a problem with the date of birth section, at least on July 14. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Music/DateOfBirth/July_14 looks absolutely fine, but when rendered on Portal:Music, the last item overflows into a weird box with a dotted line around it. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Music&oldid=63033220 in case this is just for July 14. I can't see what's wrong with the code, it all looks OK to me, but clearly there's something wrong there. Madder 21:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Did you Know section

Everything is looking really good and updated, except for the Did you Know section. Is there a way we could get this updated regularly, perhaps with some kind of rotation system, or even getting it to show random facts each time the page loads or each day? Madder 21:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi, this is my personal contribution in this section that you can use for update:

File:Sergei Lemeshev.jpg
  1. ...that, in the 1940s, the female fans of the Soviet tenor Sergei Lemeshev (pictured), often quarrelled with the fans of his rival, Ivan Kozlovsky? Entered DYK on May 30 2006
  2. ...that an unknown manuscript of opera libretto by writer Mikhail Bulgakov was found in Isaak Dunayevsky's archive after his death in 1955? June 04, 2006
  3. ...that the symphony said to have been written in 1809 by Ukrainian landowner Mykola Ovsianiko-Kulikovsky was later proven to be a hoax? June 30, 2006
  4. ...that the first performance of Glinka's opera A Life for the Tsar (1836) was conducted by Catterino Cavos, who composed an opera on the same subject 20 years before Glinka? July 6, 2006
  5. ...that composer Veniamin Fleishman was killed at the beginning of the Second World War before he could complete his opera Rothschild's Violin, but that his teacher Dmitri Shostakovich rescued his sketches from besieged Leningrad and completed the opera? July 9, 2006
  6. ...that Russian composer Boris Sobinov was abducted from the Berlin American Zone by the NKVD and condemned to ten years in prison in the Soviet Union? July 11, 2006

Regards, Yours, (meladina 08:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC))

Recent FA's and Main FA

First of all, this page is looking better and better. Nice work! Question about FA's: what's the current guideline for deciding on one? Or do we even have one? Also, does the "Recent FA's" refer to FA's on the portal or on the main page? Gregorian chant just made FA status would be a good candidate for the page IMHO. Pink Floyd's been there a while. MarkBuckles 07:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Just found information on nominating FA's for here. MarkBuckles 07:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Template:Cite album-notes

Be aware a Template:Cite album-notes is available for citing album notes. Please use.--Cerejota 09:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Upload classical sheet music?

For the older classical pieces, is it a copyright violation to upload musical works? For example, could I upload a Mozart's concerto sheet music and make it available to everyone? PDF's are images and WP accepts them just fine. I think this would be a great way to make music available to everyone.--Tbeatty 05:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I think the copyright belongs to the publisher of the sheet music. So for example if you printed the sheet music yourself (eg. using notation software), then it would be OK. Madder 17:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

music by decade

Especially for "popular" genres (jazz reggae rock music-hall etc) it woudl be useful to have a groupig of articles by decade... or is it somewhere lese on wikipeida and I've missed it ? jm

More anniversaries needed

Hello, just to note we need more anniversaries for the portal, in particular for the months of November, December and January - the pages for these months are currently blank, so when these months come round, there won't be anything showing on Portal:Music. Could someone add some? I'm having trouble finding some for these months. Thanks, Madder 17:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

NOV:

DEC:

JAN:

--Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 02:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Folajimi, thanks for these! :-) By the way, I've also noticed the birthday's list is also about to go blank in about a week or so because those days haven't yet been filled in - does your list of birthdays cover these days? Cheers, Madder 01:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. The list has been that way from the beginning; I have always worked at staying a week ahead. Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 12:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Anniversaries

I've discovered an amazing resource at List of musical events. Is there a way of getting some of this content to automatically appear in the anniversaries section as it gets updated? Because that would be really cool, and would solve the problem of the Anniversaries section being a bit light on content at the moment. Madder 22:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Music Portal revamp

Unfortunately the Music Portal failed in its nomination as a featured portal candidate. It's a shame, but a lot of good feedback was given, and looking through it now, I think a lot of improvements can still be made, aka. another total revamp. The main issues seem to be:

  • Layout: the 'Explore' box at the top is cool, but takes up too much space. Is there a way of having the same content within it, but using up space more sparingly? The other issue I have with it is what should actually go in it - reverts are always having to be made when users add things to it. How should we decide what goes in it? At the moment we're relying on some 'vital articles' list, but should we? And there seem to be other places listing recommended music articles and so on.
  • Today's Birthdays: this a really valuable resource, but it's very long, so is there a way of getting it so that just some parts from it are shown on the portal page, with a link to another page with the whole thing? Also, there are some red links within it, these shouldn't be shown on the portal page.
  • Anniversaries: For some months, the list is very short, for others, it's very very long - could the same be done as above? And the short lists should perhaps be expanded... or perhaps not?
  • Any other ideas to make the portal even better?...

Madder 15:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Regarding anniversaries... I noticed that birthdays were included in that list; an action which defeats the purpose of having a separate section on birthdays. Historic releases of recordings, deaths, and other notable events will be much better suited for such a category.
Regarding birthdays... One simple solution would be to create another page which contains — at most — a dozen entries for each day. Then, a link from that page to the extended page for more information. The shorter pages could then be the ones featured on the Portal's main page. (FWIW, my attention is directed at improving this category; as such, I am somewhat unavailable to hunt down information on legitimate anniversaries.)
Regarding aesthetics... Unfortunately, I am unable to comment on this matter. IMHO, it is much more important to include content at this point in time. However, if someone else is willing to spend time on that, that's fine by me.
Finally, it is unclear to me why it is important to have this portal become a "featured portal"; this has never been a factor for my involvment with the portal. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 02:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
The Explore box is squatter now. I'm happy with what's in it. What other places are you referring to, Madder? Λυδαcιτγ 19:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, these ideas all sound very good, and the explore box looks much better. I hope we can implement it all. Regarding featured portal, I'm not saying it's a necessity or aim - the aim of this portal is to make Music articles on Wikipedia more accessible, nothing else - but when the portal was a candidate for featured portal, some interesting criticisms came up which I think should be addressed primarily for this portal's aim of making Music articles more accessible. I think the portal's looking so much better than it used to, but it could look even better! So I hope we can resolve the issues brought up by the criticisms made and make this a truly excellent portal. Madder 03:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Browser incompatiblity?

Hi this is just to let u know that the music portal is all garbled in my particular browser. I have headings from some articles sections lying all over the page and some articles are actualy layered on top of other articles.

I'm not particularly computer savvy so unforutunatley all I can tell u is that I am running IE6 on Win XP with SP2, and that I don't usually have any problems with css layouts on other pages.

Ta

John Legend

Hi everyone! I'm an Italian Wikipedia user and I need your help since I'm going to write the articles about John Legend's albums Get Lifted and Once Again. I need to know: should I consider these two albums as the 1st and 2nd or as the 4th and 5th? I ask you this because

  • here and here there are a list of 5 albums and the chronology shows former albums, but
    • here there's the indication Years active: 2004 - present. 2004: year of Get Lifted release. Moreover,
      • here the album is indicated as the sophomore album: that is, the 2nd one.

Any help will be accepted with enthusiasm. Thanks in advance! 151.28.127.56 21:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Hi, this request would probably go best on the Music Noticeboard (link at the top of Portal:Music). The Music Noticeboard is for requesting help with Music-related articles, whilst this talk page is for discussing things directly related to the Music Portal. Thanks! Madder 17:56, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Oops... Sorry! this page is used differently in the Italian Wikipedia... 151.28.96.25 22:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I propose a split of this Portal.

I say that we split this portal into two different portals one for singers, songs, genres, etc., and another one for music theory (rhythms, instruments, notation, etc.). The portal right now seems to have a huge spectrum of topics. —Captain538[talk] 20:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Birthdays & Anniversaries problems

I think the Birthdays section is a really useful section of the portal, but it's just too long. Is there any way we can trim it down so that only part of it shows (with a link to the rest) and with no red links? Also, is there any way we can tie the Birthdays and Anniversaries sections in with List of musical events? To be honest, I think there's a lot of duplication going on. I think the Anniversaries and Birthdays sections should be merged into one, made shorter, and perhaps use content from List of musical events. Madder 14:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

The partial showing for birthdays has been implemented; Folajimi is going to start using it. Λυδαcιτγ 02:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Looks perfect, great job! :-) Madder 04:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Sound of the day

Wikipedia:Sound of the day has been on the front side of this page for several months now, though I've neglected to update the weekly offerings for quite a while. What I want to know is, have folks noticed it? I'm going to try to revive it in the coming days; anyone who is interested in helping please see Wikipedia talk:Sound of the day. Thanks.--Pharos 03:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

RFI

Two questions:

1. Recently, I have refrained from participating in discussions on this talk page; the feature [of convenience] which allows feedback to specific subsections — a local edit button — has been missing for quite a while now. Is anyone else aware of this? Having to use the main edit button when this page is overloaded with discussions can be quite cumbersome.

Fixed. Λυδαcιτγ 21:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

2. The January 08 birthday entry on Wendell Phillips Culley was concealed for some unexplained reason. What specifically is the issue with the entry? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 15:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

If it's not concealed, the entry appears like this:
Wendell Phillips Culley (January 8, 1906 –[[ June {{{6}}}| June {{{6}}}]], 1983), American trumpeter, would have turned 101 this year.
I wasn't sure how to fix it so I just commented it out for the time being, so it can quickly be reinstated when the problem is sorted.I think it might have something to do with the last variable in the template entry being a month (June) rather than the specific date (a number), but I'm not sure? Madder 22:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Birthdays

The birthdays section is really cumbersome. I think that we should create two separate sections, one for living people, and one for the deceased to cut some confusion. bibliomaniac15 00:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

How would that help? Λυδαcιτγ 00:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I think the real problem is that hidemain=true isn't being put in enough and so the list is too long and full of red links. I've been going through putting in hidemain=true for some time now but it's a pain in the neck, and I've even looked into an automated way of doing it but can't find anything. I don't think dividing it into separate sections would help, rather it would make the whole thing even more laborious than it already is. We really need some automated way of sticking hidemain=true into entries with red links, and every other odd entry to shorten the list, because at the moment it's just making Portal:Music look a plain mess, and I just can't keep up with having to update it the whole time. Best, Madder 17:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Adding the hidemain attribute to redlinked articles would be easy. I can do that if you want. Λυδαcιτγ 18:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
All right, it wasn't as easy as I thought it would be, but I did this. However, you have to use the pagelink variable if you want an entry whose page is not at the author's name to show up on the main Portal page - so Folajimi, piped entries won't show up. Here's how to make the change. Λυδαcιτγ 19:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking columns, not sections. Sorry for the miswording. bibliomaniac15 18:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Single calendar

As it stands, a new calendar has to be created annually for each month of birthdays. For example, Portal:Music/DateOfBirth/February/2007 will be useless next year because the current month fails to account for the extra date of the leap year. This means that Portal:Music/DateOfBirth/February/2008 will have to be created, and the day the month starts will have to be recalculated.

Is it possible to have a single list of calendar dates, which automatically adjusts to determine which day of the week the month begins? It would also avoid having to manually determine how many rows of weeks needs to be "hard coded" into each template.

An apropos example of the row calculation would be Portal:Music/DateOfBirth/December/2006, which happened to span across six weeks. (Note that the same could be said for any other month — except February of course...) --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 14:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that this is impossible with the current magic words. However, one way to save time would be to do a big transfer for the next year or two from the main calendar pages, like {{FebruaryCalendar2007}} and {{FebruaryCalendar2007Source}}.
Alternatively, we could ask the owner of the bot which made the main calendar source pages to run the bot again, and include an optional variable that we could use to make each calendar link to the DOB page, rather than the article about that date. Then, instead of creating new pages for each month, we would link to the main calendar page for that month, which would be updated by the updater of those pages. Λυδαcιτγ 19:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
The idea is to make the calendar as dynamic as possible; if using the bot would be the most effective method of achieving this goal, then perhaps that would be the best route to take. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 22:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Actually, the functionality was already in the source code. Everything should be set until 2025! Λυδαcιτγ 04:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
How can this functionality be employed here? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 14:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Now, instead of creating new pages for each year, we let the main calendar bot create the pages (which have been made up to 2025) and base our calendars on the source code for theirs.
Unless someone sees a problem with the new system, I'll ask an admin to delete all the Portal:Music/DateOfBirth/<Month>/<2006/2007> pages. Λυδαcιτγ 18:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
I guess that takes care of that. Thanks for looking into this matter. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 02:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Page format

Is much of the page garbled, like overlapping headings, large gaps, etc. or is it just my screen? Cricket02 03:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

It's fine for me. Maybe get Firefox if you don't have it already? Or try adjusting your font size? Λυδαcιτγ 03:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm. I figured it was just this screen so I tried looking on a different puter and no change. And I just tried many other portals and subportals and they look fine. I dunno. Cricket02 05:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Come to think of it, I've been on the page many times before and it looked fine then.  ??? Is it just me? Cricket02 05:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm not at Firefox, and on my screen it's the same. Tomer T 21:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I just wonder why all the other subportals show up fine on my screen(s), just not the music portal......any ideas?? Its kinda got me baffled. Cricket02 01:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I would suggest creating a user subpage (e.g., User:Cricket02/Test), copying the source code from Portal:Music, and playing around with the code. If you find a fix you can then apply it to the actual Portal page. Λυδαcιτγ 02:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Audacity's suggestion. Could you also give us the platform you're using, ie. exact operating system version, browser version etc. Madder 00:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm not at Firefox, and on my screen it's the same. Tomer T 21:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
I just wonder why all the other subportals show up fine on my screen(s), just not the music portal......any ideas?? Its kinda got me baffled. Cricket02 01:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I would suggest creating a user subpage (e.g., User:Cricket02/Test), copying the source code from Portal:Music, and playing around with the code. If you find a fix you can then apply it to the actual Portal page. Λυδαcιτγ 02:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Audacity's suggestion. Could you also give us the platform you're using, ie. exact operating system version, browser version etc. Madder 00:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
I thought that was a good idea too, but tried and failed miserably (technically challenged). Anyway, I just now finally took the time to check into what Firefox was, downloaded it as my new web browser, and what a difference. The page is perfect. I use Windows 2000 and had IE 6.0, of which has been screwing up lately anyway like shutting down, etc., very aggravating, so I think I'm really going to like Firefox as a browser, never actually knew there were choices before, (duh). I thank you both for your suggestions. Cricket02 00:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Offline version

Is there a way I could download an offline version of the entire music subgroup? I'd like to have it as an offline reference...is that even possible? Help would be appreciated, thank you!! Cam hovey90 02:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

  • I know a CD of selected Wikipedia articles is released, but I don't know which articles are on there and how one would go about obtaining it. A google search for "offline wikipedia" also brings up some interesting results. Madder 14:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry if this is a stupid question

... but where can I go to find the music help-desk? I've search everywhere, or at least it feels that way... I'm beginning to think that it doesn't even exist...? But that doesn't seem rational. Can anybody provide me with a link to the music help-desk, please? ► Adriaan90 ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ 22:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Try the Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment or Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities. bibliomaniac15 22:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot :D ► Adriaan90 ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ 10:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

DYK rotations.

Is the rotation of the "Did You Know?" section random, or is there a specific order in which the entries are rotated? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 15:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

They rotate every three days — 1 to 2 to 3. Λυδαcιτγ 00:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Is it possible to make it random? For example, if there are nine such pages, is there a way to make it appear in a random fashion (e.g. 2 to 8 to 5 to 4 to 1 to 8 to 9 to ...)? --Folajimi (leave a note) 01:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Definitely, but with only 3 it seems preferable to rotate. Λυδαcιτγ 01:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. I am willing to look into creating more to make it worthwhile. How about adding six pages? --Folajimi (leave a note) 02:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
No objections here — would be a major improvement. Λυδαcιτγ 03:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
6 pages sounds like a great idea. Madder 16:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm taking a break; filling out the calendar has left me rather spent. This will be the first item on the agenda when I return. --Folajimi (leave a note) 22:32, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Music video stuck in my head

Hey ppl

I was wondering if you could help me. I have this music video playing over and over in my head but I cant remember who the artist is or what the song is. I know this is a long shot, but if can help me, please do.

The music video starts off with a guy in casual clothes and he finds this balloon with a womans face on it. He tries to catch her, but fails, then she lets him catch her (the balloon) they walk down the street and a bunch of kids see them. One of the kids has a ketty and shoots the balloon-faced-girl and she pops. Its a beautiful duet between these two.

Please, I feel like Mrs Daisy, except I'm being driven up the wall.

Regards T 196.207.47.60 17:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 19:40 14-05-07 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 196.207.47.60 (talk) 17:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC).

Folajimi has finished the birthdays entries, and Madder has submitted a request for peer review. It looks to me like this Portal is ready to be featured. The first step will be to work on the to-do list, and meanwhile, let's take a new look at the Portal for anything else that could be changed. Λυδαcιτγ 02:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Totally agree. A few points about the to-do list though:
  1. I don't think quotes are actually a good idea. We'll get into a whole debate about which quotes should actually be there, and also they seem to detract from the main content below (I would criticise the decision to use quotes on the French portal). As a compromise however, maybe some quotes could go in the 'Did You Know' section?
  2. I agree with what is said on Portal talk:Music/Important, there are too many Featured Articles listed in the 'Explore...' box. There should be a limit.
  3. ...And then featured here we come! (let's hope! :-)
Madder 23:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Portal:Music/Did you know done - 5 pages total and better image sizes. Λυδαcιτγ 01:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

We need to work on keeping the Music News section updated. Should be easy enough with sites like [1]. Λυδαcιτγ 01:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Disappearing project?

Whatever happened to the OmniMusica? Is it an abandoned effort, or is there just not enough stated interest to keep it going? - NDCompuGeek 03:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Both, I guess. It seems like a non-optimal use of time to me - I don't see many people buying an encyclopedia of just music when they could get the full encyclopedia instead. Λυδαcιτγ 22:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Hmmmm.... Maybe something should be put on the OmniMusica page that states something like "This effort has been closed due to ....". Just caught my eye as I was surfing through some music stuff. - NDCompuGeek 00:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Isn't the inactive tag sufficient? Λυδαcιτγ 02:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Small bug in Portal:Music/Did_you_know/Nav

Hi, Just noticed there's a little bug in Portal:Music/Did_you_know/Nav - both links to Page 1 and Page 2 actually link to Page 7. I can't see what the problem is in the code? Madder 02:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. Λυδαcιτγ 04:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured Article

How come so many of the featured articles are to do with Slayer? It seems someone is a bit obsessed to me. Andyroo g 09:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

  • I agree that there do seem to be a lot of recently featured music-related articles on Wikipedia to do with Slayer. However, featured articles aren't chosen by one person. Instead, one person has to put up an article to become featured, and then any Wikipedia user can either agree or disagree with the nomination. Clearly in this case there have been a lot of improvements made to several Slayer-related articles meaning that they were all worthy of featured-article status. It's nothing to do with one person being obsessed. Madder 19:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Can never get enough Slayer! M3tal H3ad 13:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Templates seeking approval

I have created a set of music Navboxes, and I'm trying to seek approval. Each one covers a certain genre or category. Now I realize we already have a Template:Navbox musical artist. I feel that one template can't support all genres of musc (suppose if the one template was changed, it would affect all other template, which could be a pain). The templates can be found HERE. I have only created navboxes for "solo hip hop artist", "hip hop groups" (i.e. D12, G-Unit, NWA, etc.), "solo pop singer", "pop group" (i.e. Destiny's Child, NSYNC, etc.), "solo rock singer" (i.e. John Lennon, Paul McCartney, etc.), "rock band", and "other". If there are any other notable genres to be created, I can create it. The more feedback I have on this, the better. MITB LS 23:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh hey... can I get feedback on my talk page? cause I'll be checking that a lot more frequently than this talk page. Thank you. MITB LS 01:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Portal:Heavy metal

I reckon Portal:Heavy metal (which is up at FPoc) is a worthy candidate for inclusion in the subportals section, but it's hard to see how the design could be adjusted. Any thoughts? CloudNine 08:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I would recommend removing sub-subportals, such as classical guitar, which is a subportal of guitar. Or removing specific and unupdated portals such as eurovision and pipeorgan. Reducing the size of the images should also be looked at, as it would give room for another row. Another option could be to make a music portals template such as {{military browsebar}}. Joe I 02:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Done (first suggestion). Thanks. Λυδαcιτγ 03:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

wikimobileactunsigned.com

Hello guys,

Have just started a wiki-directory of local music info across the UK - do any of you, who know stuff about local scenes in the UK, fancy popping over to help start it up? I think it could be a very powerful resource, when filled up :)

More info on the site here: http://www.wikimobileactunsigned.com

Annihilatenow 16:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Troldhaugen: Who's Wedding?

Does anyone know who's wedding was being celebrated in Edvard Greig's "Wedding Day at Troldhaugen?" Or suggest where to go to ask? Thank you, Shir-El too (talk) 03:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

sound samples for musical instruments

I would find it very helpful if articles on musical instruments included sound samples. While it may appear somewhat useless in case of the sound of a piano or a violin, it does much less so when one would like to feel the difference between a clarinet and an obeo. I myself noticed that when listenig to instrumental classical music I am often not capable of clearly establishing what instrument I am hearing.

It may be interesting to agree on a simple melody which could then be interpreted on various instruments thereby making it easy to compare the sound. dpavlic 17:41, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikinews import

We should take advantage of the User:Wikinews Importer Bot. Λυδαcιτγ 18:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

 Done RichardF (talk) 01:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

List of...

Is there a real need to have articles for "List of <genre> <musicial instrument players>"? Of the ones I had a look at here, here, and here, these types of lists would be better off in categories, of which there already are. UnfriendlyFire (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Asked atWikipedia:WikiProject Music UnfriendlyFire (talk) 02:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, my name is Iron Chef. Just wanted to say that you all have done an excelent job in setting up this portal! The composite image at the top of the page looks great, and everything seems to be very well organised. I am the administrator at my own Wikia Wiki called Garage Bands, and I could use some help setting up Portals and pages simular to this one. I hope it doesn't sound like I'm spamming, because all I really want is some help setting up portals and attracting users. If anyone would like to help me with this, please let me know :). (My Garage Bands Talk Page) --Iron Chef (talk) 21:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't know where to ask my question

Hi I'm Omar. Wikipedia helped me follow the singles/albums of my favourite singers but something is really missing. A year ago (something like that) you still putted the chart positions in the infobox. It was fantastic! But now, you don't put it there anymore. Why that? It was very good that way!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.250.128.75 (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bandeau_portail_musique.jpg has unfortunately been deleted. Is anyone up for making a replacement? Λυδαcιτγ 05:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I was the author of the banner, I made a backup "just in case". I hope I'll find enough time someday to make a new one.. Dake (talk) 21:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Is it useful for solfege/harmony/...?

I built this tables about notes-keys. Maybe you can find it useful to put in any article, it's up to you. On the other hand, it shows how some notes articles are not done: could be done a redirect as in G-flat minor and A-sharp major (I'm just starting learning music, so I don't know myself if it would be correct). If you use the tables or a version please tell me to learn more. Sobreira (parlez) 14:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Box formatting

Malyctenar, I don't understand this change, from this formatting to this. Certain sections should be split into two columns, as they were, to reduce the amount of display space taken up by the box on the main Portal page. Λυδαcιτγ 01:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Try watching it in 1024*768. The template was a terrible mess: Stuffing the "Composers & musicians" into a column with 20% width, and THEN splitting it into two, means most of the names were broken on two lines; together with centering creating staggered edges, this made it rather hard to read the contents. This split was especially pointless for the genres & forms column, which (even bloated by occasional linebreaking) took up less then half of the table's height. And there was a lot of blankspace on the bottom of the other columns as well.
I do admit that some names fit into the narrow semicolumn, i. e. my edit increased the total height of the table. To reduce it back, I see these solutions: Either separate the few modern pop musicians from the majority of classical composers (which would be a good idea anyway) and put them on the side as well (utilizing some more blank space). Or, return to the "two equally filled columns" layout, but that would probably require using a table code directly and not the inflexible col templates. I'm willing to code either, provided I don't step on anybody's toes. What do you say? --Malyctenar (talk) 10:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
P. S. BTW, you might want to shorten your sig as shown above.
Yes, I see what you mean. However, at 1280x800, with no broken names, the height of the box is nearly doubled by the change (see images). If you can get the split columns to work with a custom-coded table, that would be excellent. Λυδαcιτγ 00:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

List of contemporary classical ensembles

Is this page really necessary? It contains a list of ensembles which can be already found in Category:Contemporary classical music ensembles. Except from the list itself, it contains no more information. --Tomaxer (talk) 20:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Why no progressive rock in genres?

Sorry if I'm posting this incorrectly, but I couldn't help that progressive rock--arguably one of the most prevalent geres of rock in the 70s--is not listed in the "genres" section. Or am I missing something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yessongsbrasil (talk • contribs) 04:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

No Jazz Composers? Just Mostly Classical!?

I Know I'm new here, but I joined to address matters such as these(Lack of Diversity Imagination & Recognition{as well as flaws}). Only six out of twenty six are not Classical Composers. Thats why I suggest any of the following Composers:
Duke Ellington, James Reese Europe, John Philip Sousa, Benny Goodman, Jelly Roll Morton, Fats Waller, Django Reinhardt, Oscar Peterson, Thelonious Monk, Irving Berlin, Count Basie, Sun Ra, George Gershwin, John Coltrane or Miles Davis to replace Jean Sibelius in the Top 26. --Morahman7vn (talk) 02:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Musical Notation in Articles?

I've noticed that articles which involve the writing of musical score do so by inserting graphics. Therefore, if a user wishes to notate something they must use an external program to do so and save as an image. I was wondering if it would be possible to introduce musical notation like that which is used in mathematical articles to express formulae.

I'm not sure whether Wikipedia uses something MathML or LaTeX based for its mathematics, however that is the sort of thing I'm talking about. MusicTex perhaps?

Options: http://www.ctan.org/cgi-bin/search.py?metadataSearch=music&metadataSearchSubmit=Search 82.3.240.21 (talk) 23:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikisource:Sheet music, et al.. ¦ Reisio (talk) 01:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
This could potentially be added to the WikiMedia software, but would be very complicated to implement. -download | sign! 21:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

New layout

Just wondering about changes to the layout made the other week. I like the idea of a WikiProject Music box, but I'm not sure about the proposed new colour scheme. Can we discuss, thanks :-) Madder (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

It was a vast upgrade to all music portals ....But all ok the portal still looks fine .. Category:Music portals Buzzzsherman (talk) 19:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Heaviness/lightness?

"Music can be in many forms of heaviness and lightness, heaviest being black viking metal, lightest being petite classical."

This sentence in the portal intro just stands out to me as very strange. While I'm not refuting it, I'm not so sure it should be stated in such a blankly authoritative manner either. If we're going to talk about the general qualities of music in the intro, isn't it best to stick to the better established ideas of tempo, rhythm, and dynamics? "Heaviness" may be more accessible, and in some ways descriptive, but it's also very subjective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.76.186.98 (talk) 19:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree, and I think it may have been vandalism. I have removed this sentence. Feel free to discuss here if we want to put it back. Madder (talk) 18:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Bands?

Many bands turn up under WikiProject Musicians (under WikiProject Biography). Shouldn't the "band" be over under WikiProject Music somewhere? I see no where to put bands? -- Mjquin_id (talk) 06:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Some bands turn up as Musicians but I agree that there is a problem with where to put bands, of whatever description. I came here seeking a template for River City Brass Band. I looked at other brass bands, and Brass band and Concert band, but these articles don't seem to have any project templates in their talk pages. Does anyone have an answer? --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Great concert photografs from Hamburg, Germany 1970s

Hi. Here the photografer Heinrich Klaffs from Hamburg, Germany, puts his collection of concert pics from the 1970s under a useable licence on flickr. Enjoy! --Krächz (talk) 20:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Kevin Was Here

Hello, I am Kevin. I am currently running a series of projects, one of them being trombone. Please help me by visiting my main page and contributing to my research project. —Preceding undated comment added 22:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC).

Project WikiLyrics!

Hello, Please consider contributing to a new project I have created, Project WikiLyrics. You will find all of the information you need about joining and helping out with the project. I'm really excited about this project! If you like music as much as I do, please consider joining this project and helping out! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctyonahl (talk • contribs) 20:12, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Ross Royce

Can someone take a look at this article - it has clearly been written by his own PR department, and needs a considerable amount of work to make it encyclopedic. Cheers. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion

Please see this Musical portal related CfD discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_September_6#Category:Celebrity_birthdays. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Help resolve a dispute at CBS Records

Go to Talk:CBS Records and help decide whether the article should be on both business entities called CBS Records. We have CBS Records (1962-1988) with 1,300 incoming links and CBS Records (2006) with 4 potential links. The alternative for the article is just CBS Records (2006) with 4 potential links and then change all 1,300 incoming links to one of the other business entities related to CBS Records (1962-1988) such as Sony which bought the company in 1988 or Columbia Records or Epix Records or any other of the subsidiary labels owned by RCA Records. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Beatles RfC

You are invited to participate in an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/The Beatles on the issue of capitalising the definite article when mentioning that band's name in running prose. This long-standing dispute is the subject of an open mediation case and we are requesting your help with determining the current community consensus. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 23:46, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Infobox Edition Proposal

I propose to add to the Artist Infobox a section where it shows the artist's influences, and to whom they influenced; just like the one in the Philosophy area. Here's an example:

Karl Heinrich Marx
Marx in 1875

I believe this addition will give a better understanding of the different periods of music and which artists got their "special sound" from. Kind of like saying:
Queen was influenced by The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, The Who, Black Sabbath, Slade, Deep Purple and David Bowie.

Queen influenced Anthrax, Nirvana, Def Leppard, Dream Theater, Extreme, Trivium, Foo Fighters, Franz Ferdinand, George Michael, Green Day, Guns N' Roses, Iron Maiden, Journey, Kansas, Katy Perry, Keane, Lady Gaga, Manic Street Preachers, Meat Loaf, Metallica, Mika, Muse, My Chemical Romance, Panic at the Disco, Queensrÿche, Van Halen, Radiohead, Robbie Williams, Trent Reznor, Steve Vai, Sum 41, Styx, The Flaming Lips, The Killers, and The Smashing Pumpkins.

Only that in the neat style of a table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveMX (talk • contribs) 03:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Mehring, Franz, Karl Marx: The Story of His Life (Routledge, 2003) pg. 75
  2. ^ John Bellamy Foster. "Marx's Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology", American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 2 (September 1999), pp. 366-405.
  3. ^ Allen Oakley, Marx's Critique of Political Economy: 1844 to 1860, Routledge, 1984, p. 51.

Question

Could anybody lend me a hand? Back in the day there used to be an article which listed songs which shared the same title, but which were completely unrelated. It was pretty extensive and encompassed many songs and artists. I've searched for it a lot recendtly, but haven't found it. Thanks in advance, --Sn0wflake (talk) 01:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sets of unrelated songs with identical titles? Luckily you have the admin super-power needed to read it. -- John of Reading (talk) 10:11, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Wow, thank you a whole lot for digging this up. Despite how far this article strays from the standards we follow today, this is one of those really cool things that made the Wikipedia something really fun for me back then... I kind of really want to mirror it somewhere... maybe on my Userspace or something. --Sn0wflake (talk) 03:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Portal maintenance

I note that the Selected article has not been updated since 2007. Is anyone able to take over maintaining and updating the portal or converting the stale sections to randomised content? Otherwise I fear its featured status will require review. Espresso Addict (talk) 05:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

I've installed a randomised selection of 10 featured articles to be going on with. If no-one objects, I'll randomise the "Did you know" box next week. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Excellent, thank you. Espresso Addict (talk) 10:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 Done I've created 20 random sub-pages each with one picture and four DYKs. The full list of music-related DYK articles is in my sandbox (permanent link). -- John of Reading (talk) 14:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

RS for music

What sites are RS for music, specifically genres? Is such a list maintained? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 22:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Leon Gurvitch

Who is? Bye, --79.31.123.164 (talk) 23:04, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

AfD Imaginary Records

Can I please get some kind fellows to contribute to the AfD for the Article Imaginary Records please. Thanks guys. olowe2011 (talk) 02:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

National albums/music charts

Proposal to rename, where appropriate, national music charts articles to territory and format rather than official name, so Swedish music charts rather than Sverigetopplistan, etc. Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Record Charts#National Albums/Music Charts. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

RfC Taio Cruz

You are invited to visit Talk:Taio Cruz to join the discussion regarding if what sources are reliable to determine alternative names for this artist. Are liner notes reliable sources? Are birth certificates reliable sources? // Liftarn (talk) 09:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Federazione Industria Musicale Italiana / Hit Parade Italia

Hello,

I would like to know what thinking about the source Hit Parade Italia. Because it's used for songs like the Good Article "Into the Groove" or "Hungry Like the Wolf" inside the charts with the name of FIMI. But the Federazione Industria Musicale Italiana was born in 1992. So how how FIMI could rank in 1982 and 1985 ? What's more, according to the website :

"In Italia, la prima classifica di vendita settimanale risale al 1959 e fu pubblicata dall'ormai scomparsa rivista "Il Musichiere". Da allora, negli anni, si sono succedute diverse classifiche, più o meno autorevoli ed affidabili. Le nostre classifiche sono ottenute rielaborando tutti i dati disponibili dalle pubblicazioni dell'epoca e sono in continuo affinamento man mano che recuperiamo i relativi dati, depurandoli di errori ed incongruenze." [2]

"In Italy, the first of the weekly bestseller list dates back to 1959 and was published by the now disappeared magazine "The Musichiere". Since then, over the years, there have been several classifications, more or less authoritative and reliable. Our rankings are obtained by rearranging all available data from the publications of the time and are in constant refinement as we recover its data, trying to remove errors and inconsistencies."

And:

"Il terzo limite è dovuto alla non completezza dei dati in nostro possesso. Ma su questo punto tu che stai leggendo queste note puoi fornire un contributo notevolissimo, aggiungendo i dati in tuo possesso a quelli già presenti nel sito." [3]

"The third limitation is due to the incompleteness of the data in our possession. But on this point you who are reading these notes you can provide a remarkable contribution, adding the data in your possession to those already on the site."

Thereby, Hit Parade Italia sounds not very reliable.

Should we don't use it? Greetings from French Wikipedia --TaupeGun (talk) 01:32, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

@TaupeGun: Exactly, HPI has never had any kind of “official” status and should never have been used. In German Wikipedia We have very exact rules about Italian chart data (here), maybe that helps. When I come across such data here on English WP, I usually just delete it. Regards, XanonymusX (talk) 13:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal_talk:Music/Archive_1&oldid=1096052993"