Ortiz v. Jordan

Ortiz v. Jordan
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 24, 2011
Full case name	Ortiz v. Jordan
Citations	562 U.S. 180 (more)
Holding
A party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
Majority	Ginsburg, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Ortiz v. Jordan, 562 U.S. 180 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits.

See also

• Dupree v. Younger

External links

• Text of Ortiz v. Jordan, 562 U.S. 180 (2011) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)