Jump to content

Dupree v. Younger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dupree v. Younger
Decided May 25, 2023
Full case nameDupree v. Younger
Docket no.22-210
Citations598 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
A post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 is not required to preserve for appellate review a purely legal issue resolved at summary judgment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinion
MajorityBarrett, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Fed. R. Civ. P. 50

Dupree v. Younger, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 is not required to preserve for appellate review a purely legal issue resolved at summary judgment.[1][2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Dupree v. Younger, No. 22-210, 598 U.S. ___ (2023).
  2. ^ "Court rules for Maryland prison official on procedural issue". SCOTUSblog. 2023-05-31. Retrieved 2024-11-14.
[edit]
  • Text of Dupree v. Younger, No. 22-210, 598 U.S. ___ (2023) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)