Senary

A senary (/ˈsiːnəri, ˈsɛnəri/) numeral system (also known as base-6, heximal, or seximal) has six as its base. It has been adopted independently by a small number of cultures. Like the decimal base 10, the base is a semiprime, though it is unique as the product of the only two consecutive numbers that are both prime (2 and 3). As six is a superior highly composite number, many of the arguments made in favor of the duodecimal system also apply to the senary system.

Formal definition

The standard set of digits in the senary system is ${\mathcal {D}}_{6}=\lbrace 0,1,2,3,4,5\rbrace$ , with the linear order $0<1<2<3<4<5$ . Let ${\mathcal {D}}_{6}^{*}$ be the Kleene closure of ${\mathcal {D}}_{6}$ , where $ab$ is the operation of string concatenation for $a,b\in {\mathcal {D}}^{*}$ . The senary number system for natural numbers ${\mathcal {N}}_{6}$ is the quotient set ${\mathcal {D}}_{6}^{*}/\sim$ equipped with a shortlex order, where the equivalence class $\sim$ is $\lbrace n\in {\mathcal {D}}_{6}^{*},n\sim 0n\rbrace$ . As ${\mathcal {N}}_{6}$ has a shortlex order, it is isomorphic to the natural numbers $\mathbb {N}$ .

Mathematical properties

Senary multiplication table
×	1	2	3	4	5	10
1	1	2	3	4	5	10
2	2	4	10	12	14	20
3	3	10	13	20	23	30
4	4	12	20	24	32	40
5	5	14	23	32	41	50
10	10	20	30	40	50	100

When expressed in senary, all prime numbers other than 2 and 3 have 1 or 5 as the final digit. In senary, the prime numbers are written:

2, 3, 5, 11, 15, 21, 25, 31, 35, 45, 51, 101, 105, 111, 115, 125, 135, 141, 151, 155, 201, 211, 215, 225, 241, 245, 251, 255, 301, 305, 331, 335, 345, 351, 405, 411, 421, 431, 435, 445, 455, 501, 515, 521, 525, 531, 551, ... (sequence A004680 in the OEIS)

That is, for every prime number p greater than 3, one has the modular arithmetic relations that either p ≡ 1 or 5 (mod 6) (that is, 6 divides either p − 1 or p − 5); the final digit is a 1 or a 5. This is proved by contradiction.

For any integer n:

If n ≡ 0 (mod 6), 6 | n
If n ≡ 2 (mod 6), 2 | n
If n ≡ 3 (mod 6), 3 | n
If n ≡ 4 (mod 6), 2 | n

Additionally, since the smallest four primes (2, 3, 5, 7) are either divisors or neighbors of 6, senary has simple divisibility tests for many numbers.

Furthermore, all even perfect numbers besides 6 have 44 as the final two digits when expressed in senary, which is proven by the fact that every even perfect number is of the form 2^{p – 1}(2^p – 1), where 2^p − 1 is prime.

Senary is also the largest number base r that has no totatives other than 1 and r − 1, making its multiplication table highly regular for its size, minimizing the amount of effort required to memorize its table. This property maximizes the probability that the result of an integer multiplication will end in zero, given that neither of its factors do.

If a number is divisible by 2, then the final digit of that number, when expressed in senary, is 0, 2, or 4. If a number is divisible by 3, then the final digit of that number in senary is 0 or 3. A number is divisible by 4 if its penultimate digit is odd and its final digit is 2, or its penultimate digit is even and its final digit is 0 or 4. A number is divisible by 5 if the sum of its senary digits is divisible by 5 (the equivalent of casting out nines in decimal). If a number is divisible by 6, then the final digit of that number is 0. To determine whether a number is divisible by 7, one can sum its alternate digits and subtract those sums; if the result is divisible by 7, the number is divisible by 7, similar to the "11" divisibility test in decimal.

Fractions

Because six is the product of the first two prime numbers and is adjacent to the next two prime numbers, many senary fractions have simple representations:

Fraction	Prime factors of the denominator	Positional representation	Positional representation	Prime factors of the denominator	Fraction
Decimal base Prime factors of the base: 2, 5 Prime factors of one below the base: 3 Prime factors of one above the base: 11			Senary base Prime factors of the base: 2, 3 Prime factors of one below the base: 5 Prime factors of one above the base: 7 (=11₆)
⁠1/2⁠	2	0.5	0.3	2	⁠1/2⁠
⁠1/3⁠	3	0.3333... = 0.3	0.2	3	⁠1/3⁠
⁠1/4⁠	2	0.25	0.13	2	⁠1/4⁠
⁠1/5⁠	5	0.2	0.1111... = 0.1	5	⁠1/5⁠
⁠1/6⁠	2, 3	0.16	0.1	2, 3	⁠1/10⁠
⁠1/7⁠	7	0.142857	0.05	11	⁠1/11⁠
⁠1/8⁠	2	0.125	0.043	2	⁠1/12⁠
⁠1/9⁠	3	0.1	0.04	3	⁠1/13⁠
⁠1/10⁠	2, 5	0.1	0.03	2, 5	⁠1/14⁠
⁠1/11⁠	11	0.09	0.0313452421	15	⁠1/15⁠
⁠1/12⁠	2, 3	0.083	0.03	2, 3	⁠1/20⁠
⁠1/13⁠	13	0.076923	0.024340531215	21	⁠1/21⁠
⁠1/14⁠	2, 7	0.0714285	0.023	2, 11	⁠1/22⁠
⁠1/15⁠	3, 5	0.06	0.02	3, 5	⁠1/23⁠
⁠1/16⁠	2	0.0625	0.0213	2	⁠1/24⁠
⁠1/17⁠	17	0.0588235294117647	0.0204122453514331	25	⁠1/25⁠
⁠1/18⁠	2, 3	0.05	0.02	2, 3	⁠1/30⁠
⁠1/19⁠	19	0.052631578947368421	0.015211325	31	⁠1/31⁠
⁠1/20⁠	2, 5	0.05	0.014	2, 5	⁠1/32⁠
⁠1/21⁠	3, 7	0.047619	0.014	3, 11	⁠1/33⁠
⁠1/22⁠	2, 11	0.045	0.01345242103	2, 15	⁠1/34⁠
⁠1/23⁠	23	0.0434782608695652173913	0.01322030441	35	⁠1/35⁠
⁠1/24⁠	2, 3	0.0416	0.013	2, 3	⁠1/40⁠
⁠1/25⁠	5	0.04	0.01235	5	⁠1/41⁠
⁠1/26⁠	2, 13	0.0384615	0.0121502434053	2, 21	⁠1/42⁠
⁠1/27⁠	3	0.037	0.012	3	⁠1/43⁠
⁠1/28⁠	2, 7	0.03571428	0.0114	2, 11	⁠1/44⁠
⁠1/29⁠	29	0.0344827586206896551724137931	0.01124045443151	45	⁠1/45⁠
⁠1/30⁠	2, 3, 5	0.03	0.01	2, 3, 5	⁠1/50⁠
⁠1/31⁠	31	0.032258064516129	0.010545	51	⁠1/51⁠
⁠1/32⁠	2	0.03125	0.01043	2	⁠1/52⁠
⁠1/33⁠	3, 11	0.03	0.01031345242	3, 15	⁠1/53⁠
⁠1/34⁠	2, 17	0.02941176470588235	0.01020412245351433	2, 25	⁠1/54⁠
⁠1/35⁠	5, 7	0.0285714	0.01	5, 11	⁠1/55⁠
⁠1/36⁠	2, 3	0.027	0.01	2, 3	⁠1/100⁠

Finger counting

34_senary = 22_decimal, in senary finger counting

Each regular human hand may be said to have six unambiguous positions; a fist, one finger extended, two, three, four, and then all five fingers extended.

If the right hand is used to represent a unit (0 to 5), and the left to represent the multiples of 6, then it becomes possible for one person to represent the values from zero to 55_senary (35_decimal) with their fingers, rather than the usual ten obtained in standard finger counting. e.g. if three fingers are extended on the left hand and four on the right, 34_senary is represented. This is equivalent to 3 × 6 + 4, which is 22_decimal.

Additionally, this method is the least abstract way to count using two hands that reflects the concept of positional notation, as the movement from one position to the next is done by switching from one hand to another. While most developed cultures count by fingers up to 5 in very similar ways, beyond 5 non-Western cultures deviate from Western methods, such as with Chinese number gestures. As senary finger counting also deviates only beyond 5, this counting method rivals the simplicity of traditional counting methods, a fact which may have implications for the teaching of positional notation to young students.

Which hand is used for the 'sixes' and which the units is down to preference on the part of the counter; however, when viewed from the counter's perspective, using the left hand as the most significant digit correlates with the written representation of the same senary number. Flipping the 'sixes' hand around to its backside may help to further disambiguate which hand represents the 'sixes' and which represents the units. The downside to senary counting, however, is that without prior agreement two parties would be unable to utilize this system, being unsure which hand represents sixes and which hand represents ones, whereas decimal-based counting (with numbers beyond 5 being expressed by an open palm and additional fingers) being essentially a unary system only requires the other party to count the number of extended fingers.

In NCAA basketball, the players' uniform numbers are restricted to be senary numbers of at most two digits, so that the referees can signal which player committed an infraction by using this finger-counting system.^[1]

More abstract finger counting systems, such as chisanbop or finger binary, allow counting to 99, 1023, or even higher depending on the method (though not necessarily senary in nature). The English monk and historian Bede, described in the first chapter of his work De temporum ratione, (725), titled "Tractatus de computo, vel loquela per gestum digitorum," a system which allowed counting up to 9,999 on two hands.^[2]^[3]

Natural languages

Despite the rarity of cultures that group large quantities by 6, a review of the development of numeral systems suggests a threshold of numerosity at 6 (possibly being conceptualized as "whole", "fist", or "beyond five fingers"^[4]), with 1–6 often being pure forms, and numerals thereafter being constructed or borrowed.^[5]

The Ndom language of Indonesian New Guinea is reported to have senary numerals.^[6]^[7] Mer means 6, mer an thef means 6 × 2 = 12, nif means 36, and nif thef means 36 × 2 = 72.

Another example from Papua New Guinea are the Yam languages. In these languages, counting is connected to ritualized yam-counting. These languages count from a base six, employing words for the powers of six; running up to 6⁶ for some of the languages. One example is Komnzo with the following numerals: nibo (6¹), fta (6² [36]), taruba (6³ [216]), damno (6⁴ [1296]), wärämäkä (6⁵ [7776]), wi (6⁶ [46656]).

Some Niger-Congo languages have been reported to use a senary number system, usually in addition to another, such as decimal or vigesimal.^[5]

Proto-Uralic has also been suspected to have had senary numerals, with a numeral for 7 being borrowed later, though evidence for constructing larger numerals (8 and 9) subtractively from ten suggests that this may not be so.^[5]

Base 36 as senary compression

For some purposes, senary might be too small a base for convenience. This can be worked around by using its square, base 36 (hexatrigesimal), as then conversion is facilitated by simply making the following replacements:

Decimal	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17
Base 6	0	1	2	3	4	5	10	11	12	13	14	15	20	21	22	23	24	25
Base 36	`0`	`1`	`2`	`3`	`4`	`5`	`6`	`7`	`8`	`9`	`A`	`B`	`C`	`D`	`E`	`F`	`G`	`H`

Decimal	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27	28	29	30	31	32	33	34	35
Base 6	30	31	32	33	34	35	40	41	42	43	44	45	50	51	52	53	54	55
Base 36	`I`	`J`	`K`	`L`	`M`	`N`	`O`	`P`	`Q`	`R`	`S`	`T`	`U`	`V`	`W`	`X`	`Y`	`Z`

Thus, the base-36 number 3ARK₃₆ is equal to the senary number 3144332₆. In decimal, it is 153,920.

The choice of 36 as a radix is convenient in that the digits can be represented using the Arabic numerals 0–9 and the Latin letters A–Z; this choice is the basis of the base36 encoding scheme. The compression effect of 36 being the square of 6 causes a lot of patterns and representations to be shorter in base 36:

⁠19₁₀⁠ = 0.04₆ = 0.4₃₆

⁠116₁₀⁠ = 0.0213₆ = 0.29₃₆

⁠15₁₀⁠ = 0.1₆ = 0.7₃₆

⁠17₁₀⁠ = 0.05₆ = 0.5₃₆

References

^ Schonbrun, Zach (March 31, 2015). "Crunching the Numbers: College Basketball Players Can't Wear 6, 7, 8 or 9". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-08-31.
^ Bloom, Jonathan M. (Spring 2002). "Hand sums: The ancient art of counting with your fingers". Boston College. Archived from the original on August 13, 2011. Retrieved May 12, 2012.
^ "Dactylonomy". Laputan Logic. 16 November 2006. Archived from the original on 23 March 2012. Retrieved May 12, 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
^ Blevins, Juliette (3 May 2018). "Origins of Northern Costanoan ʃak:en 'six':A Reconsideration of Senary Counting in Utian". International Journal of American Linguistics. 71 (1): 87–101. doi:10.1086/430579. JSTOR 10.1086/430579. S2CID 144384806.
^ ^a ^b ^c Plank, Frans (26 April 2009). "Senary summary so far" (PDF). Linguistic Typology. 13 (2). doi:10.1515/LITY.2009.016. S2CID 55100862. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-04-06. Retrieved August 31, 2022.
^ Owens, Kay (April 2001). "The work of Glendon Lean on the counting systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania". Mathematics Education Research Journal. 13 (1): 47–71. Bibcode:2001MEdRJ..13...47O. doi:10.1007/BF03217098. ISSN 1033-2170. S2CID 161535519. Retrieved August 31, 2022 – via Springer.
^ Owens, Kay (2001), "The Work of Glendon Lean on the Counting Systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania", Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13 (1): 47–71, Bibcode:2001MEdRJ..13...47O, doi:10.1007/BF03217098, S2CID 161535519, archived from the original on 2015-09-26

External links

[1] Schonbrun, Zach (March 31, 2015). "Crunching the Numbers: College Basketball Players Can't Wear 6, 7, 8 or 9". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-08-31.

[handsums-2] Bloom, Jonathan M. (Spring 2002). "Hand sums: The ancient art of counting with your fingers". Boston College. Archived from the original on August 13, 2011. Retrieved May 12, 2012.

[laputan-3] "Dactylonomy". Laputan Logic. 16 November 2006. Archived from the original on 23 March 2012. Retrieved May 12, 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)

[4] Blevins, Juliette (3 May 2018). "Origins of Northern Costanoan ʃak:en 'six':A Reconsideration of Senary Counting in Utian". International Journal of American Linguistics. 71 (1): 87–101. doi:10.1086/430579. JSTOR 10.1086/430579. S2CID 144384806.

[plankS-5] Plank, Frans (26 April 2009). "Senary summary so far" (PDF). Linguistic Typology. 13 (2). doi:10.1515/LITY.2009.016. S2CID 55100862. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-04-06. Retrieved August 31, 2022.

[6] Owens, Kay (April 2001). "The work of Glendon Lean on the counting systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania". Mathematics Education Research Journal. 13 (1): 47–71. Bibcode:2001MEdRJ..13...47O. doi:10.1007/BF03217098. ISSN 1033-2170. S2CID 161535519. Retrieved August 31, 2022 – via Springer.

[7] Owens, Kay (2001), "The Work of Glendon Lean on the Counting Systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania", Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13 (1): 47–71, Bibcode:2001MEdRJ..13...47O, doi:10.1007/BF03217098, S2CID 161535519, archived from the original on 2015-09-26

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]