Jump to content

Medieval English episcopal register

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An Episcopal register (Latin: Episcopi registrum, or Bishop's Register) in the English Medieval Ages was a document, often consisting of several volumes, in which a bishop's or archbishop's activity was recorded.

Creation and purpose

[edit]
Opening page of the Bishop of Salisbury's register
Opening page of the episcopal register of Robert Neville, Bishop of Salisbury 1427–1438, before his translation to the Diocese of Durham. The introductory section translates as

Register of the most reverend [Registrum reverendissimi] Lord Christ the father, Lord Robert Nevylle, with divine permission Bishop [Eps] of Salisbury, presented and questioned and admitted to all documents and acts [in[stitucioni]bus collacionibus ... alise act[is]] in the year of our lord one thousand 400th [CCCCXXVII] and twenty seventh [vicesimo septimo] and consecrated his first year [suo Anno primo] receiving the temporalities following in the fullness of time [in tempore suo]

A bishop's (or archbishop's)[note 1] register was a legal record of his correspondence and instructions to the outside world,[2] and its legal position was that of a notarial record writ large.[3] It was the bishop's main archive.[4] Hill describes it as comprising three main elements: "as formulae, as records of things which had been done, and as records of things which had been acquired".[5] But Hill also advises against treating it as a mere document of events, seeing it as "a record of the use of a bishop's authority, and as such it was his greatest safeguard if that authority was challenged".[6]

The register was mostly composed as a book, often comprising several volumes, although in some instances they were recorded as roll, and handwritten[7] by the Registrar,[8] occasionally using both sides of the page.[9] Ecclesiastical scholar Rosalind Hill suggests that the reason the book form became more popular among their creators was their increased tractability over a roll, which she describes as "most inconvenient".[5] For example, in 1290, the Bishop of Lincoln's registrar, John de Scalleby, wrote himself an aide-memoire to the effect that, should he need to return to a specific item, it "must be sought in various places in the roll of 1288 about the middle of the roll."[5] De Scallesby seem to have been an innovator, and introduced a form of index calendar, particularly for letters dimissory, dispensations, indulgences, and new installations. The cross-referencing was elaborate.[10]

Registrars appear to have occasionally had a staff of scribes.[9] They began being created in the late 13th century; until then, there appears to have been little written down regarding the bishop's activities.[11] Matters investigated and recorded included his visitations to monasteries and abbeys under his jurisdiction, often reporting on their chapter meetings and how the rule was enforced,[12] The discipline of monks, nuns and priests was recorded, as were ordination lists recalling an individual's progress through the ranks of the church,[13] and as to the inhabitancy of the institution—on occasion, the admission of children was recorded.[14] They also recorded elections in religious houses and, conversely, the quashing of elections when the bishop deemed it necessary, as well as staffing matters.[15] This included complaints of the "dumping" of nuns into often already impoverished abbeys, that is, placing unwanted daughters into religion.[16] Fines handed out by the bishop's court are recorded[17] as are licenses dispensed, such as those to beg.[18] The most powerful tool in a bishop's armoury was excommunication;[19] such instances of its imposition are also recorded.[20] The register also contained instructions received by the bishop. The Pope might send dispensations, the archbishop his own instructions, and communications with the King, and while some of these might merely need storing in a safe place, others required frequent reference made to them.[5] Benefices were important to record accurately as they were not only legal documents but conveyed rights of patronage to the receiver.[13]

At the time, it was common for monasteries to act as secure storage for wealthy local families, and these contracts were often recorded into the registers[21] for a small fee, including original charters and the inspeximi.[22] Diocesan protection was considered stronger than that of a parish church or other house, as these were occasionally broken into and robbed.[21] Registers were also used by contemporaries who sought evidence of past events in their pages[23] and bishops had ready access to the registers of their predecessors.[24]

Use by historians

[edit]
Archbishop of York's enrolled register
Walter de Grey's register as Archbishop of York was early enough in its creation to still be enrolled rather than bound; this is the first few membranes stitched together.

Historian Eileen Power has demonstrated that "much information about the conduct of abbesses and prioresses" can be garnered from the registers and particularly the leadership's attempts to control a house's superior "can be multiplied" from the register mentions.[25] She also warns, however, that often only the formulaic pro forma was recorded in the registry itself and that individual cases and their specific evidence was omitted.[26] However, they may, on occasion, record the responses of individuals in whatever their chosen language (so, for example, illustrating cases of literacy among laymen).[27] They occasionally contain or mention material from other bishop's registers which is yet now lost.[2] Hill notes that, albeit unknown to us today, there may have been more than one copy of a register written, and also notes their bulk: Bishop Sutton's, for example, spread over eight volumes and comprised around two million words.[28] In the 13th century, William de Wickwane, Archbishop of York, caused his registers to be written in duplicate.[29]

Problems

[edit]

Episcopal registers generally focussed on issues that were brought to diocesan attention as being problematic. As a result, they may not reflect an accurate picture of the state of religion in the area. Similarly to court records, they record the complaints but not the positives.[12] They were often heavily condensed versions of what had taken place; for example, an ordination—a multi-layered procedure—might only be recorded with a single line.[30] As a result they often record the result of a process rather than the details of how the result was reached. Therefore, says Robert Swanson, "much is committed and falls beneath their radar. All of the original paperwork has generally to be imagined."[13]

A problem faced by historians using registers, suggests Hill, is that certain items were considered more important than others and so preserved more efficiently. Visitations, for example, were "of strictly temporary value"[5] compared with the bishop's letters and instructions, which were, in turn, better preserved.[5] Relatively few have survived, and those that do come mainly from England. There are very few Welsh registers extant, and none whatsoever from Scotland.[31]

Published episcopal registers

[edit]
Arms Arch/diocese Title Editor Notes Reference
Bath and Wells The Registers of Walter Giffard, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1265–6, and of Henry Bowett, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1401–1407 Thomas Scott Holmes Somerset Record Society volume 13, 1899. [32]
Calendar of the register of John de Drokensford, bishop of Bath and Wells, A.D. 1309–1329 Edmund Hobhouse Somerset Record Society volume 1, 1887 [33]
The Register of Ralph of Shrewsbury, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1329–1363 Thomas Scott Holmes Somerset Record Society vols 9 & 10: 2 vols, 1896 [34]
The Register of Nicholas Bubwith, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1407–1424 Thomas Scott Holmes Somerset Record Society vols 29 & 30: 2 vols, 1914 [35]
The Register of John Stafford, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1425–1443 Thomas Scott Holmes Somerset Record Society vols 30 & 31 [36]
The Registers of Robert Stillington, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1466–1491, and Richard Fox, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1492–1494 Henry Maxwell Lyte Somerset Record Society vol 52 [37]
Canterbury The Canterbury Archiepiscopates of John Stafford (1443–52) and John Kemp (1452–54) with Editions of their Registers David Blair Foss King's College, University of London PhD thesis, 1986 [38]
Carlisle The Episcopal Registers of Carlisle: The Register of Bishop John de Halton W. N. Thompson Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society/Canterbury and York Society, 1909 [39]
Chichester The Episcopal register of Robert Rede, ordinis predicatorum, Lord Bishop of Chichester, 1397–1415 C. Deedes Sussex Record Society volume 11, 1910 [40]
Coventry and Lichfield The Episcopate of Walter Langton, Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield, 1296–1321: With a Calendar of his Register Jill Blackwell Hughes University of Nottingham PhD thesis: 3 volumes, 1992 [41]
Durham The Register of Richard de Kellawe, Lord Palatine and Bishop of Durham, 1311–1316 Thomas Duffus Hardy Cambridge University Press, 1878 [42]
Richard D'aungerville [Bishop of Durham], of Bury: Fragments of his Register, and other Documents G. W. Kitchin Surtees Society, volume 119, 1910 [43]
Exeter The Registers of Walter Bronescombe (A.D. 1257–1291), and Peter Quivil (A.D. 1280–1291), Bishops of Exeter, with some Records of the Episcopate of Bishop Thomas de Bytton (A.D. 1292–1307) F. C. Hingeston-Randolph William Pollard, 1889 [44]
The Register of Walter de Stapeldon, Bishop of Exeter, (A.D. 1307–1326) F. C. Hingeston-Randolph William Pollard, 1892 [45]
The Register of John de Grandisson, Bishop of Exeter, (A.D. 1327–1369) F. C. Hingeston-Randolph William Pollard, 1894–1899, 3 volumes [46]
The Register of Thomas de Brantyngham, Bishop of Exeter (A.D. 1370–1394) F. C. Hingeston-Randolph William Pollard, 1901–1906, 2 volumes [46]
The Register of Edmund Stafford, Bishop of Exeter (A.D. 1395–1419): An Index and Abstract of its Contents F. C. Hingeston-Randolph William Pollard, 1886 [47]
Hereford Registrum Thome de Cantilupo, Episcopi Herefordensis, A.D. 1275–1282 R. G. Griffiths Canterbury and York series volume 2, 1907 (Latin) [48]
The Register of Adam de Orleton, Bishop of Hereford (A. D. 1317–1327) A. T. Bannister Cantilupe Society/Canterbury and York Society, 1907 [49]
Lincoln Lincoln diocese documents, 1450–1544 Andrew Clark Early English Text Society, original ser., volume 149, 1914. Also a database. [50]
The Register of Adam de Orleton, Bishop of Hereford (A. D. 1317–1327) A. T. Bannister Cantilupe Society/Canterbury and York Society, 1907 [49]
Rochester Registrum Roffense: Records relating to Rochester Cathedral John Thorpe W. & J. Richardson, 1769 [51]
St Davids The Episcopal Registers of the Diocese of St. David's 1397 to 1518 R. F. Isaacson Cymmrodorion Record Series, volume 6, 1917 [52]
Salisbury Vetus Registrum Sarisberiense alias dictum Registrum S. Osmundi Episcopi: The Register of S. Osmund W. H. Rich Jones Rolls Series, volume 78, 1883 [53]
Winchester Wykeham's Register: William of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester, 1366-1404 T. F. Kirby Lollard Society, 1899 [54]
Worcester Worcester Diocese: Bishops' Registers Mel Lockie Worcestershire Historical Society, 2021: an online database of diocesan registers, 1275–1538, including the Sede vacante years [55]
York York's Archbishops Registers Borthwick Institute for Archives University of York, 2016: an ongoing online database of diocesan registers [56]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ An Archbishop is still also a diocesan, and so his registers are also a bishop's registers though augmented with more Papal and royal documents in his position as a metropolitan and Papal Legate. E. F. Jacob argued that the two archdioceses in England, therefore, contained slightly different material on account of their differing foundations. Canterbury had been a monastic foundation, while York's had been secular. The former, for example, had no prebends to be concerned with, while the latter was mostly concerned with the various chapters and collegiate churches.[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jacob 1953, p. 5.
  2. ^ a b Hill 1951, p. 43.
  3. ^ Swanson 1997, p. 161 n.68.
  4. ^ Swanson 2015, p. 21.
  5. ^ a b c d e f Hill 1951, p. 44.
  6. ^ Hill 1951, p. 47.
  7. ^ York Archbishops' Registers 2023.
  8. ^ Lovatt 1993, p. 136 n.36.
  9. ^ a b Owen 1965, p. 101.
  10. ^ Hill 1951, p. 46.
  11. ^ Power 1922, p. 237.
  12. ^ a b Amt 1993, p. 201.
  13. ^ a b c Swanson 2015, p. 22.
  14. ^ Power 1922, p. 26.
  15. ^ Power 1922, pp. 26, 63.
  16. ^ Power 1922, p. 191.
  17. ^ McDougall 2012, p. 39.
  18. ^ Power 1922, p. 73.
  19. ^ Hreinsson 2021, p. 269 n.148.
  20. ^ Power 1922, pp. 183 n.6, 225.
  21. ^ a b Burton 1994, p. 262.
  22. ^ Hill 1951, p. 51.
  23. ^ Owen 1965, p. 102.
  24. ^ Hill 1951, p. 48.
  25. ^ Power 1922, p. 80.
  26. ^ Power 1922, p. 495.
  27. ^ Minnis 2009, p. 10.
  28. ^ Hill 1951, pp. 44, 49.
  29. ^ Cheney 1950, p. 107.
  30. ^ Swanson 1997, p. 154.
  31. ^ Swanson 2015, pp. 21–22.
  32. ^ Holmes 1899.
  33. ^ Hobhouse 1887.
  34. ^ Holmes 1896–1897.
  35. ^ Holmes 1914.
  36. ^ Holmes 1915–1916.
  37. ^ Maxwell-Lyte 1937.
  38. ^ Foss 1986.
  39. ^ Thompson 1909.
  40. ^ Deedes 1910.
  41. ^ Hughes 1992.
  42. ^ Hardy 1878.
  43. ^ Kitchin 1910.
  44. ^ Hingeston-Randolph 1889.
  45. ^ Hingeston-Randolph 1892.
  46. ^ a b Hingeston-Randolph 1894–1899.
  47. ^ Hingeston-Randolph 1886.
  48. ^ Griffiths 1907.
  49. ^ a b Bannister 1907.
  50. ^ Clark 1914.
  51. ^ Thorpe 1769.
  52. ^ Isaacson 1917.
  53. ^ Rich Jones 1883–1884.
  54. ^ Kirby 1896.
  55. ^ Lockie 2021.
  56. ^ Borthwick Institute for Archives 2016.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Amt, E. (1993). Women's Lives in Medieval Europe: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-41590-628-9.
  • Burton, J. (1994). Monastic and Religious Orders in Britain, 1000–1300. Cambridge Medieval Textbooks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-52137-797-3.
  • Cheney, C. R. (1950). English Bishops' Chanceries, 1100–1250. University of Manchester Faculty of Arts Publications. Manchester: University of Manchester Press. OCLC 246782120.
  • Hill, R. (1951). "Bishop Sutton and His Archives: a Study in the Keeping of Records in the Thirteenth Century". Journal of Ecclesiastical History. 2: 43–53. OCLC 321030578.
  • Hreinsson, H. (2021). Force of Words: A Cultural History of Christianity and Politics in Medieval Iceland (11th- 13th Centuries). Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-9-00444-957-2.
  • Jacob, E. F. (1953). The Medieval Registers of Canterbury and York: Some Points of Comparison. Borthwick Institute of Historical Research. London: St. Anthony's Press. OCLC 2629138.
  • Lovatt, R. (1993). "Two Collegiate Loan Chests in Late Medieval Cambridge". In Zutshi, P. N. R. (ed.). Medieval Cambridge: Essays on the Pre-Reformation University. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer. pp. 129–166. ISBN 978-0-85115-344-5.
  • McDougall, S. (2012). Bigamy and Christian Identity in Late Medieval Champagne. The Middle Ages. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-81220-654-8.
  • Minnis, A. (2009). Translations of Authority in Medieval English Literature: Valuing the Vernacular. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-5215-1594-8.
  • Owen, D. M. (1965). "Vetus Repertorium, an Early Memorandum Book of the Diocese of Lincoln". Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society. 4: 100–106. OCLC 795670466.
  • Power, E. (1922). Medieval English Nunneries, C. 1275 to 1535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. OCLC 418287300.
  • Swanson, R. (1997). "Universis Christi Fidelibus: The Church and its Records". In Britnell, R. H. (ed.). Pragmatic Literacy, East and West, 1200-1330. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer. pp. 147–166. ISBN 978-0-85115-695-8.
  • Swanson, R. N. (2015). "Bishoprics and Parishes". In Swanson, R. N. (ed.). The Routledge History of Medieval Christianity: 1050-1500. London: Routledge. pp. 19–30. ISBN 978-1-31750-809-0.
  • York Archbishops' Registers (2023). "York Archbishops' Registers". archbishopsregisters.york.ac.uk. Retrieved 2023-06-13.

Published registers

[edit]
  • Bannister, A. T., ed. (1907). The Register of Adam de Orleton, Bishop of Hereford (A. D. 1317–1327). Hereford: Cantilupe Society/Canterbury and York Society. OCLC 21550224.
  • Borthwick Institute for Archives (2016). "York Archbishops' Registers". archbishopsregisters.york.ac.uk. Retrieved 2023-06-17.
  • Clark, A., ed. (1914). Lincoln diocese documents, 1450–1544. Early English Text Society. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Oxford University Press. OCLC 462671436.
  • Deedes, C., ed. (1910). The Episcopal Register of Robert Rede, Ordinis predicatorum, Lord Bishop of Chichester, 1397–1415 (in Latin). Lewes: Sussex Record Society. OCLC 1053647449.
  • Foss, D. B. (1986). The Canterbury Archiepiscopates of John Stafford (1443–52) and John Kemp (1452–54) with Editions of their Registers (PhD thesis). University of London. OCLC 1000626054.
  • Griffiths, R. G., ed. (1907). Registrum Thome de Cantilupo, Episcopi Herefordensis, A.D. 1275–1282. Canterbury and York (in Latin). Vol. 1 + 2. London: Canterbury and York Society. OCLC 843359172.
  • Hardy, T. D., ed. (1878). The register of Richard de Kellawe, lord Palatine and Bishop of Durham, 1311–1316. Rolls Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. OCLC 967358862.
  • Hingeston-Randolph, F. C., ed. (1886). The Register of Edmund Stafford, [Bishop of Exeter] (A.D. 1395–1419): An Index and Abstract of its contents. Exeter: H.S. Eland. OCLC 933169213.
  • Hingeston-Randolph, F. C., ed. (1889). The Registers of Walter Bronescombe (A.D. 1257–1291), and Peter Quivil (A.D. 1280–1291), Bishops of Exeter, with some Records of the Episcopate of Bishop Thomas de Bytton (A.D. 1292–1307). London: G. Bell. OCLC 7214043.
  • Hingeston-Randolph, F. C., ed. (1892). The Register of Walter de Stapeldon, Bishop of Exeter, (A.D. 1307–1326). London: G. Bell. OCLC 1000780234.
  • Hingeston-Randolph, F. C., ed. (1894–1899). The Register of John de Grandisson, Bishop of Exeter, (A.D.1327–1369). Vol. 1, 2 + 3. Exeter: William Pollard. OCLC 952988431.
  • Hobhouse, E., ed. (1887). Calendar of the Register of John de Drokensford, Bishop of Bath and Wells, A.D. 1309–1329. Somerset Record Society. London: Harrison. OCLC 614580070.
  • Holmes, T. S., ed. (1899). The Registers of Walter Giffard, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1265–1266, and of Henry Bowett, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1401–1407. Somerset Record Society. London: Harrison. OCLC 5818623.
  • Holmes, T. S., ed. (1896). The Register of Ralph of Shrewsbury, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1329–1363. Somerset Record Society. Vol. 1 + 2. London: Harrison. OCLC 15080595.
  • Holmes, T. S., ed. (1914). The Register of Nicholas Bubwith, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1407–1424. Somerset Record Society. Vol. 1 + 2. London: Harrison. OCLC 5818579.
  • Holmes, T. S., ed. (1915–1916). The Register of John Stafford, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1425–1443: From the Original in the Registry at Wells. Somerset Record Society. Vol. 1 + 2. London: Harrison. OCLC 642533162.
  • Hughes, J. B. (1992). The episcopate of Walter Langton, Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield, 1296–1321: With a Calendar of his Register (PhD thesis). University of Nottingham. OCLC 1358552905.
  • Isaacson, R. F., ed. (1917). The Episcopal Registers of the Diocese of St. David's 1397 to 1518. London: Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion. OCLC 4281725.
  • Kirby, T. F., ed. (1896). Wykeham's Register: William of Wykeham, Bishop of Winchester, 1366–1404]. Lollard Society. London: Simpkin. OCLC 12784168.
  • Kitchin, G. W., ed. (1910). Richard D'aungerville [Bishop of Durham], of Bury: Fragments of his Register, and other Documents. Durham: Surtees Society. OCLC 1110263671.
  • Lockie, M. (2021). "Registers". www.melocki.org.uk. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 2023-06-17.
  • Maxwell-Lyte, H. C., ed. (1937). The Register of John Stafford, Bishop of Bath and Wells, 1425–1443: From the Original in the Registry at Wells. Somerset Record Society. London: Harrison. OCLC 503819524.
  • Rich Jones, W. H., ed. (1883–1884). Vetus Registrum Sarisberiense alias dictum Registrum S. Osmundi Episcopi: The Register of S. Osmund. Rolls Series (in English and Latin). Vol. 1 + 2. London: Longman. OCLC 912727628.
  • Thompson, W. N., ed. (1909). The Episcopal Registers of Carlisle: The Register of Bishop John de Halton, 1300–1309. Kendal: T. Wilson. OCLC 669769050.
  • Thorpe, J., ed. (1769). Registrum Roffense: Records relating to Rochester Cathedral. London: W. & J. Richardson. OCLC 646577516.

Further reading

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Medieval_English_episcopal_register&oldid=1225828975"