You wouldn't get the wanted image instead in any of the three mentioned articles. You would get no image or another map. Images can only be taken from the lead in Wikipedia and mw:Extension:PageImages#Image choice says: "Any images for which the ratio is less than 0.5 will score negatively and be discarded." PrimeHunter (talk) 17:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
PrimeHunter, why does the correct image show when logged in then? All three of the above articles generate proper images (though Shea Stadium looks pretty awful) when hovering while logged in. I tried purging the pages and it made no difference; the map still appears when logged out. Home Lander (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Transclude {{MediaWiki:Bad image list}} onto this page. Since none of the images on the Bad image list should be used outside of their designated pages, they should not show up in pop-ups or search results fed by pageimages either. (Note that this will require a null edit or a purge with the forcerecursivelinkupdate option be done on this page when MediaWiki:Bad image list is updated.) --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 15:26, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Xaosflux I've tested running the same SQL query that the pageimages extension does to pull the pagelinks table, and as long as the transcluding page is null edited or purged with the recursivelinkupdate option the SQL query returns the full list. I have not been able to test it with the actual pagelinks extension (a test was performed on a wiki in the betacluster, but it was inconclusive as the pageimages-denylist didn't work at all on that wiki, while it clearly works here). --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 15:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know if testwiki supports that? I don't want to break this page accidentally, especially if it takes a while to cache out. — xaosfluxTalk16:26, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from it (currently) not working, I would Oppose that kind of misuse of these lists. First of all it would damage functionality such as PagePreviews. Secondly the purpose of BadImageList is vandalism prevention. That list contains 0% of our offensive images meaning it would be 0% effective, and any resemblance to an offensive-image list is incidental. If a bunch of people start spamming the Valentine's day image and it goes on the list, this proposal would be breaking PagePreviews and other functionality for the Valentine's day article. And finally, WP:NOTCENSORED is policy. It would be inappropriate to attempt to implement a censorship scheme without getting consensus on that Policy Talk page first. This idea would raise a lot of other problems as well, and there surely will be a lot of opposition at the policy page.
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the 
On hold I asked the extension developer for feedback over at mw:Extension talk:PageImages. — xaosflux Talk 15:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Not done @Ahecht: declining per developer response at mw:Topic:Wv7qxbp3jvhf9qju that transclusion is not supported for this. — xaosflux Talk 10:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
