Jump to content

Active SETI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from HELLO FROM EARTH)
Not to be confused with METI (Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence).
A representation of the 1679-bit Arecibo message

Active SETI (Active Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) is the attempt to send messages to intelligent extraterrestrial life. Active SETI messages are predominantly sent in the form of radio signals. Physical messages like that of the Pioneer plaque may also be considered an active SETI message. Active SETI is also known as METI (Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence). [1][2]

History

[edit]

'Active SETI' was a term as early as 2005, though some decades after the term SETI.[3] The term METI was coined in 2006 by Russian scientist Alexander Zaitsev, who proposed a subtle distinction between Active SETI and METI:[4][5]

The science known as SETI deals with searching for messages from aliens. METI deals with the creation and transmission of messages to aliens. Thus, SETI and METI proponents have quite different perspectives. SETI scientists are in a position to address only the local question “does Active SETI make sense?” In other words, would it be reasonable, for SETI success, to transmit with the object of attracting ETI's attention? In contrast to Active SETI, METI pursues not a local, but a more global purpose – to overcome the Great Silence in the Universe, bringing to our extraterrestrial neighbors the long-expected annunciation “You are not alone!”

Concern over METI was raised by the science journal Nature in an editorial in October 2006, which commented on a recent meeting of the International Academy of Astronautics SETI study group. The editor said, "It is not obvious that all extraterrestrial civilizations will be benign, or that contact with even a benign one would not have serious repercussions".[6] In the same year, astronomer and science fiction author David Brin expressed similar concerns.[7] In 2013 Brin amended his initial article based on the recent developments in METI.[8]

In 2010, Douglas A. Vakoch from SETI Institute, addressed concerns about the validity of Active SETI alone as an experimental science by proposing the integration of Active SETI and Passive SETI programs to engage in a clearly articulated, ongoing, and evolving set of experiments to test various versions of the Zoo hypothesis, including specific dates at which a first response to messages sent to particular stars could be expected.[9]

On 13 February 2015, scientists including Douglas Vakoch, David Grinspoon, Seth Shostak, and David Brin at an annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science discussed Active SETI, and whether transmitting a message to possible intelligent extraterrestrials in the Cosmos was a good idea.[10][11] That same week, a statement was released, signed by many in the SETI community including Berkeley SETI Research Center director Andrew Siemion, advocating that a "worldwide scientific, political and humanitarian discussion must occur before any message is sent".[12]

In July 2015, the Breakthrough Message program was announced. This was an open competition to design a digital message that could be transmitted from Earth to an extraterrestrial civilization, with a US$1,000,000 prize pool. The message was to be "representative of humanity and planet Earth". The program pledged "not to transmit any message until there has been a wide-ranging debate at high levels of science and politics on the risks and rewards of contacting advanced civilizations".[13]

Rationale for METI

[edit]

In the paper Rationale for METI,[14] transmission of the information into the Cosmos is treated as one of the pressing needs of an advanced civilization. This view is not universally accepted, and it is not agreed with by those who are against the transmission of interstellar radio messages, but at the same time are not against SETI searching. Such duality is called the SETI Paradox.[15][16]

Radio message construction

[edit]

The lack of an established communications protocol is a challenge for METI. While trying to synthesize and project an Interstellar Radio Message (IRM), the receiving extraterrestrials (ETs) will first encounter a physical phenomenon and, only after that, perceive the information. Initially, a receiving system will detect the radio signal; then the issue of the extraction of the received information and comprehension of the obtained message will arise. Therefore, above all, the constructor of an IRM should be concerned about the ease of signal determination. In other words, the signal should have maximum openness, which is understood here as an antonym of the term security. This branch of signal synthesis is termed anticryptography.

To this end, in 2010, Michael W. Busch created a general-purpose binary language,[17] later used in the Lone Signal project[18] to transmit crowdsourced messages to extraterrestrial intelligence.[19] Busch developed the coding scheme and provided Rachel M. Reddick with a test message, in a blind test of decryption.[17] Reddick decoded the entire message after approximately twelve hours of work.[17] This was followed by an attempt to extend the syntax used in the Lone Signal hailing message to communicate in a way that, while neither mathematical nor strictly logical, was nonetheless understandable given the prior definition of terms and concepts in the hailing message.[20]

In addition, characteristics of the radio signal, such as wavelength, type of polarization, and modulation are considered. Over galactic distances, the interstellar medium induces some scintillation effects and artificial modulation of electromagnetic signals. This modulation is higher at lower frequencies and is a function of the sky direction. Over large distances, the depth of the modulation can exceed 100%, making any METI signal very difficult to decode.

Error correction

[edit]

In METI research, any message must have some redundancy, although the exact amount of redundancy and message formats are still in great dispute. Using ideograms, instead of binary sequence, already offers some improvement against noise resistance. In faxlike transmissions, ideograms are spread on many lines. This increases its resistance against short bursts of noise like radio frequency interference or interstellar scintillation.

One format approach proposed for interstellar messages was to use the product of two prime numbers to construct an image. Unfortunately, this method works only if all the bits are present. As an example, the message sent by Frank Drake from the Arecibo Observatory in 1974 did not have any feature to support mechanisms to cope with the inevitable noise degradation of the interstellar medium.

Error correction tolerance rates for previous METI messages are 9% (one page) for the 1974 Arecibo Message, 44% (23 separate pages) for the 1999 Evpatoria Message, and 46% (one page, estimated) for the 2003 Evpatoria Message.

Examples

[edit]

The 1999 Cosmic Call transmission was far from being optimal (from a terrestrial viewpoint) as it was essentially a monochromatic signal spiced with supplementary information. Additionally, the message had a very small modulation index overall, a condition not viewed as being optimal for interstellar communication. Over the 370,967 bits (46,371 bytes) sent, some 314,239 were “1” and 56,768 were “0”—5.54 times as many 1's as 0's. Since frequency-shift keying modulation scheme was used, most of the time the signal was on the “0” frequency. In addition, “0” tended to be sent in long stretches, which appeared as white lines in the message.

Realized projects

[edit]
Main article: List of interstellar radio messages

The below projects have targeted stars between 17 and 69 light-years from the Earth. The exception is the Arecibo message, which targeted globular cluster M13, approximately 24,000 light-years away. The first interstellar message to reach its destination was the Altair (Morimoto - Hirabayashi) Message, which likely reached its target in 1999.[21]

Transmissions

[edit]

Below is a table of messages sent and target/destination stars, ordered chronologically by date of sending:[24][25][26][27][28][29]

Name Designation Constellation Date sent
(YYYY-MM-DD) 		Arrival date
(YYYY-MM-DD) 		Message
Messier 13 NGC 6205 Hercules 1974-11-161974-11-16 27000~ Arecibo Message
Altair Alpha Aql Aquila 1983-08-151983-08-15 2017 CALL to the COSMOS'83[30]
Libra Libra 1995 NASDA Cosmic-College
1996 NASDA Cosmic-College
Spica Alpha Vir Virgo 1997-081997-08 2247 NASDA Cosmic-College
1998 NASDA Cosmic-College
16 Cyg A HD 186408 Cygnus 1999-05-241999-05-24 2069-112069-11 Cosmic Call 1
15 Sge HD 190406 Sagitta 1999-06-301999-06-30 2057-022057-02
HD 178428 2067-102067-10
Gl 777 HD 190360 Cygnus 1999-07-011999-07-01 2051-042051-04
HD 197076 Delphinus 2000-08-292001-08-29 2070-022070-02 Teen Age Message
47 UMa HD 95128 Ursa Major 2001-09-032001-09-03 2047-072047-07
37 Gem HD 50692 Gemini 2057-122057-12
HD 126053 Virgo 2001-092001-09 2059-122059-01
HD 76151 Hydra 2001-09-042001-09-04 2057-052057-05
HD 193664 Draco 2059-012059-01
HIP 4872 Cassiopeia 2003-07-062003-07-06 2036-042036-04 Cosmic Call 2
HD 245409 Orion 2040-082040-08
55 Cnc HD 75732 Cancer 2044-052044-05
HD 10307 Andromeda 2044-092044-09
47 UMa HD 95128 Ursa Major 2049-052049-05
Polaris HIP 11767 Ursa Minor 2008-10-092008-02-04 20292439 Across the Universe
Gliese 581 HIP 74995 Libra 2008-10-092008-10-09 20292029 A Message From Earth
2008-10-092009-08-28 20302030 Hello From Earth
GJ 83.1 GJ 83.1 Aries 2009-11-072009-11-07 2024 RuBisCo Stars
Teegarden's Star SO J025300.5+165258 2022
Kappa1 Ceti GJ 137 Cetus 2039
HIP 34511 Gemini 2012-08-152012-08-15 2163 Wow! Reply
37 Gem HD 50692 2069
55 Cnc HD 75732 Cancer 2053
GJ 526 HD 119850 Boötes 2013-07-102013-07-10 2031 Lone Signal
55 Cnc HD 75732 Cancer 2013-09-222013-09-22 2053 JAXA Space Camp (UDSC-1)
55 Cnc HD 75732 Cancer 2014-08-232014-08-23 2054 JAXA Space Camp (UDSC-2)
Polaris HIP 11767 Ursa Minor 2016-10-102016-10-10 24502450 A Simple Response to an Elemental Message
Luyten's Star HIP 36208 Canis Major 2017-10-16 2030-03 Sónar Calling GJ273b

Controversy

[edit]

Whether or not to conduct Active SETI, as well as the tone of any message, is a highly controversial topic.[31][32][33][34] Active SETI has primarily been criticized due to the perceived risk of revealing the location of the Earth to alien civilizations, without some process of prior international consultation. That is, Active SETI does not meet the criteria for informed consent in a mass experiment involving human subjects and, potentially, nonhuman sentient subjects.[35]

Active SETI is discussed in terms of the ethics of space policy. Issues include whether to send belligerent versus defensive messages,[36] cosmopolitanism,[37] communicative burden, consensus, messaging content, proscriptions on premature messaging, responsibility, and shared values,[38] with concerns that even if successful, humanity could be reduced to a cargo cult.[39] David Brin also urged for an extensive international consultation before any METI activities and has debunked key rationalizations for active SETI (METI), such as the "barn door" argument (unintentional "leaked signals" were millions-fold weaker than intentional METI signals), ignoring/dismissing the precautionary principle (that requires taking extreme precaution e.g. handling extraterrestrial samples even without any known example of risks), and treating METI as being prayer-like which disregards the issue of informed consent from other people.[40] Notable among METI's critics was Stephen Hawking. Hawking, who in his book A Brief History of Time suggests that "alerting" extraterrestrial intelligences to our existence is foolhardy, citing humankind's history of treating its own kind harshly in meetings of civilizations with a significant technology gap, e.g., the extermination of Tasmanian aborigines. He suggested, in view of this history, that we "lay low".[41] Scientist and science fiction author David Brin expressed similar concerns.[42] Similarly, Liu Cixin's trilogy of novels The Three Body Problem highlights the potential dangers of METI.

However, some scientists consider these fears about the dangers of METI as panic and irrational superstition; Russian and Soviet radio engineer and astronomer Alexander L. Zaitsev has argued against these concerns.[43][44] Zaitsev argues that we should consider the risks of not attempting to contact extraterrestrial civilizations, since the knowledge and wisdom an ETI could impart to us would save us from humanity's self-destructive tendencies.[45] Similarly, in a March 2015 essay astronomer Seth Shostak considered the risk and ended by stressing that any danger was hypothetical and that humanity would better off risk contact than "endlessly tremble at the sight of the stars".[2]

Astronomer Jill Tarter also disagrees with Hawking, arguing that aliens developed and long-lived enough to communicate and travel across interstellar distances would have evolved a cooperative and less violent intelligence. She however thinks it is too soon for humans to attempt active SETI and that humans should be more advanced technologically first but keep listening in the meantime.[46]

Example of a high-resolution pictorial message to potential eti at Proxima Centauri. These messages usually contain information about the location of the solar system in the Milky Way.

To lend a quantitative basis to discussions of the risks of transmitting deliberate messages from Earth, the SETI Permanent Study Group of the International Academy of Astronautics[47] adopted in 2007 a new analytical tool, the San Marino Scale.[48] Developed by Prof. Ivan Almar and Prof. H. Paul Shuch, the San Marino Scale evaluates the significance of transmissions from Earth as a function of signal intensity and information content. Its adoption suggests that not all such transmissions are created equal, thus each must be evaluated separately before establishing a blanket international policy regarding Active SETI.[49]

In 2012, Jacob Haqq-Misra, Michael Busch, Sanjoy Som, and Seth Baum argued that while the benefits of radio communication on Earth likely outweigh the potential harms of detection by extraterrestrial watchers, the uncertainty regarding the outcome of contact with extraterrestrial beings creates difficulty in assessing whether or not to engage in long-term and large-scale METI.[50]

In 2015, in the context of the Zoo Hypothesis, biologist João Pedro de Magalhães proposed transmitting an invitation message to any extraterrestrial intelligences watching us already and inviting them to respond, arguing this would not put us in any more danger than we are already if the Zoo Hypothesis is correct.[51]

Douglas Vakoch, president of METI, argues that passive SETI itself is already an endorsement of active SETI, since "If we detect a signal from aliens through a SETI program, there's no way to prevent a cacophony of responses from Earth."[52]

In the context of potentially detected extraterrestrial activity on Earth, physicist Mark Buchanan argued that humanity needs to determine whether it would be safe or wise to attempt to communicate with extraterrestrials and work on ways to handle such attempts in an organized manner.[53]

Beacon proposals

[edit]

One proposal for a 10 billion watt interstellar SETI beacon was dismissed by Robert A. Freitas Jr. as being infeasible for a pre-Type I civilization, such as humanity, on the Kardashev scale.[54] However, this 1980s technical argument assumes omni-directional beacons, which may not be the best way to proceed on many technical grounds. Advances in consumer electronics have made possible transmitters that simultaneously transmit many narrow beams, covering the million or so nearest stars but not the spaces between.[55] This multibeam approach can reduce the power and cost to levels that are reasonable with early 21st century Earth technology.

Once civilizations have discovered each other's locations, the energy requirements for maintaining contact and exchanging information can be significantly reduced through the use of highly directional transmission technologies. To this end, a 2018 study estimated a 1-2 megawatt infrared laser focused through a 30-45 meter telescope could be seen from about 20,000 light years away.[56]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "From CETI to METI", Extraterrestrial Languages, The MIT Press, pp. 19–36, 2019, doi:10.7551/mitpress/11229.003.0003, ISBN 9780262355261, retrieved 2023-01-29
  2. ^ a b Shostak, Seth (28 March 2015). "Should We Keep a Low Profile in Space?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 March 2015. Retrieved 29 March 2015.
  3. ^ A., Vakoch, Douglas (2005). Expanding Human Presence Beyond the Solar System Through Active SETI : on the Prerequisites for Legal Relations with Extraterrestrial Intelligence. OCLC 774904900.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ Zaitsev, A. (2006). "Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence". arXiv:physics/0610031.
  5. ^ Johnson, Steven (28 June 2017). "Greetings, E.T. (Please Don't Murder Us.)". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 28 June 2017. Retrieved 28 June 2017.
  6. ^ "Ambassador for Earth". Nature. 443 (7112): 606. 2006. Bibcode:2006Natur.443..606.. doi:10.1038/443606a. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 17035960. S2CID 39467483.
  7. ^ Brin, David (June 2006). "Shouting at the Cosmos". Lifeboat Foundation. Archived from the original on March 7, 2017. Retrieved June 28, 2009.
  8. ^ Dabid Brin, Shouting At the Cosmos, 2013 addendum
  9. ^ Vakoch, D. A. (2010). "Integrating Active and Passive SETI Programs: Prerequisites for Multigenerational Research" (PDF). Proceedings of the Astrobiology Science Conference 2010. p. 5213. Bibcode:2010LPICo1538.5213V. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-08-09.
  10. ^ Borenstein, Seth (13 February 2015). "Should We Call the Cosmos Seeking ET? Or Is That Risky?". Phys.org. Archived from the original on 14 February 2015. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  11. ^ Ghosh, Pallab (12 February 2015). "Scientists in US are urged to seek contact with aliens". BBC News. Archived from the original on 13 February 2015. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  12. ^ Various (13 February 2015). "Regarding Messaging To Extraterrestrial Intelligence (METI) / Active Searches For Extraterrestrial Intelligence (Active SETI)". University of California, Berkeley. Archived from the original on 14 February 2015. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  13. ^ "Breakthrough Initiatives". www.breakthroughinitiatives.org. Archived from the original on 2023-01-16. Retrieved 2015-07-24.
  14. ^ Zaitsev, Alexander L. (2011-05-02). "Rationale for METI". arXiv:1105.0910. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. ^ Zaitsev, Alexander (2006-11-29). "The SETI Paradox". arXiv:physics/0611283. Bibcode:2006physics..11283Z. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  16. ^ Kerins, Eamonn (2020-12-22). "Mutual Detectability: A Targeted SETI Strategy That Avoids the SETI Paradox". The Astronomical Journal. 161 (1): 39. arXiv:2010.04089. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abcc5f. ISSN 0004-6256. S2CID 222209060.
  17. ^ a b c Busch, M. W.; Reddick, R. M. (2010). "Testing SETI Messages Design" (PDF). Proceedings of the Astrobiology Science Conference 2010. arXiv:0911.3976. Bibcode:2010LPICo1538.5070B. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-10-02.
  18. ^ "Message Encoding – But, Can They Read It?". Lone Signal. Archived from the original on 24 June 2013. Retrieved 7 July 2013.
  19. ^ "Recent Beams". Lone Signal. Archived from the original on 7 July 2013. Retrieved 7 July 2013.
  20. ^ Chapman, C. R. "Extending the syntax used by the Lone Signal Active SETI project". Lone Signal Active SETI. Archived from the original on 13 August 2013.
    "Lone Signal & Jamesburg Earth Station Technologies - Technical Setup" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-08-09.
  21. ^ Diaz, Jesus (14 May 2008). "Earth Set to Receive Alien Reply, Invasion in 2015?". Gizmodo.
  22. ^ Valentine, Genevieve (March 2011). "You Never Get a Seventh Chance to Make a First Impression: An Awkward History of Our Space Transmissions". Lightspeed Magazine. Archived from the original on 24 May 2016. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  23. ^ Staff (17 August 2012). "Humanity Responds to 'Alien' Wow Signal, 35 Years Later". Space.com. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  24. ^ А. Л. Зайцев. "Передача и поиски разумных сигналов во Вселенной". Пленарный доклад на Всероссийской астрономической конференции ВАК-2004 "Горизонты Вселенной", Москва, МГУ, 7 июня 2004 года (in Russian). Институт радиотехники и электроники РАН. Archived from the original on 2012-02-10. Retrieved 2018-10-01.
    [A. L. Zaitsev. "Transmission and retrieval of intelligent signals in the universe". Keynote Address at the National Astronomical Conference VAK-2004 "Horizons of Universe", Moscow, MSU, 7 June 2004. Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics RAS.]
  25. ^ "interstellar radio message (IRM)". David Darling. Archived from the original on 2008-01-11.
  26. ^ "Is anybody listening out there?". BBC News. 9 October 2008. Retrieved 11 November 2008.
  27. ^ "MIR, LENIN, SSSR". Archived from the original on 2009-06-12. Word MIR (it signifies both "peace" and "world" in Russian) was transmitted from the EPR on 19 November 1962, and words LENIN and SSSR (the Russian acronym for the Soviet Union) – on 24 November 1962, respectively were sent to the direction near the star HD131336 in the Libra constellation
  28. ^ "Gliese 526". Lone Signal. Archived from the original on 17 July 2013. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
  29. ^ "Sónar Calling GJ273b - About this project". Sónar Calling GJ273b. Sónar Music Festival. Retrieved 6 May 2021.
  30. ^ "Alien e-mail reply to arrive in 2015?". ~Pink Tentacle. 14 May 2008. Archived from the original on 1 April 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  31. ^ Shostak, S. (2014-01-01). "Sending Signals Into Space: Is it Really a Bad Idea?". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 67: 27–29. Bibcode:2014JBIS...67...27S. ISSN 0007-084X.
  32. ^ Billingham, J; Benford, J (2016). "Costs and difficulties of interstellar 'Messaging' and the need for international debate on potential risks". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 19: 17–23.
  33. ^ Gertz, J (2016). "Reviewing METI: A critical analysis of the arguments". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 69: 31–36. arXiv:1605.05663. Bibcode:2016JBIS...69...31G.
  34. ^ Haramia, Chelsea; DeMarines, Julia (2019-01-02). "The Imperative to Develop an Ethically-Informed METI Analysis". Theology and Science. 17 (1): 38–48. doi:10.1080/14746700.2019.1557800. ISSN 1474-6700. S2CID 171404637.
  35. ^ Traphagan, John W. (2019-01-02). "Active SETI and the Problem of Research Ethics". Theology and Science. 17 (1): 69–78. doi:10.1080/14746700.2019.1557806. ISSN 1474-6700. S2CID 172004039.
  36. ^ Santana, Carlos (2021-08-01). "We Come in Peace? A Rational Approach to METI". Space Policy. 57: 101430. Bibcode:2021SpPol..5701430S. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2021.101430. ISSN 0265-9646.
  37. ^ Wilson, Elspeth M.; Cleland, Carol E. (2019-07-03). "Should We Call E.T.? An Ethical-Political Analysis of METI". Theology and Science. 17 (3): 382–394. doi:10.1080/14746700.2019.1632551. ISSN 1474-6700. S2CID 198688714.
  38. ^ Haramia, Chelsea; DeMarines, Julia (2019-01-02). "The Imperative to Develop an Ethically-Informed METI Analysis". Theology and Science. 17 (1): 38–48. doi:10.1080/14746700.2019.1557800. ISSN 1474-6700. S2CID 171404637.
  39. ^ Traphagan, John W. (2018-11-01). "Cargo Cults and the Ethics of Active SETI". Space Policy. 46: 18–22. Bibcode:2018SpPol..46...18T. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.04.001. ISSN 0265-9646. S2CID 158546639.
  40. ^ Brin, David (2019-01-02). "The "Barn Door" Argument, The Precautionary Principle, and METI as "Prayer" – an Appraisal of the Top Three Rationalizations for "Active SETI"". Theology and Science. 17 (1): 16–28. doi:10.1080/14746700.2018.1557391. ISSN 1474-6700. S2CID 172101534.
  41. ^ A. Vakoch, Douglas (2017-04-03). "Hawking's fear of an alien invasion may explain the Fermi Paradox". Theology and Science. 15 (2): 134–138. doi:10.1080/14746700.2017.1299380. ISSN 1474-6700. S2CID 219627161.
  42. ^ David Brin (September 2006) [last updated July 2008]. "Shouting at the Cosmos". Lifeboat Foundation. Archived from the original on 7 March 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  43. ^ Zaitsev, Alexander L. (September 2008). "Sending and searching for interstellar messages". Acta Astronautica. 63 (5–6): 614–617. arXiv:0711.2368. Bibcode:2008AcAau..63..614Z. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.05.014. S2CID 55638129.
  44. ^ Alexander L. Zaitsev (2008). "Detection Probability of Terrestrial Radio Signals by a Hostile Super-civilization". Journal of Radio Electronics (5). arXiv:0804.2754. Bibcode:2008arXiv0804.2754Z. Archived from the original on 18 January 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  45. ^ Alexander Zaitsev; Charles M. Chafer; Richard Braastad. "Making a Case for METI". SETI League. Archived from the original on 21 February 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  46. ^ Orwig, Jessica. "A world leading scientist on the search for extraterrestrials pointed out a flaw in Stephen Hawking's fear of finding intelligent aliens". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 21 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
  47. ^ "Overview". International Academy of Astronautics – SETI Permanent Committee. Archived from the original on 10 May 2017. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  48. ^ "The San Marino Scale". International Academy of Astronautics – SETI Permanent Committee. Archived from the original on 8 December 2007. Retrieved 9 April 2017.
  49. ^ Almár, Iván; Paul Shuch, H. (2007-01-01). "The San Marino Scale: A new analytical tool for assessing transmission risk". Acta Astronautica. 60 (1): 57–59. Bibcode:2007AcAau..60...57A. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.04.012. ISSN 0094-5765.
  50. ^ Haqq-Misra, J.; Busch, M. W.; Som, S. M.; Baum, S. D. (2013). "The benefits and harm of transmitting into space". Space Policy. 29 (1): 40–48. arXiv:1207.5540. Bibcode:2013SpPol..29...40H. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2012.11.006. S2CID 7070311.
  51. ^ de Magalhaes, J. P. (2015). "A direct communication proposal to test the Zoo Hypothesis". Space Policy. 38: 22–26. arXiv:1509.03652. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2016.06.001. S2CID 119250429.
  52. ^ Hannah Osborne (2017-11-16). "Scientists Have Sent Messages to Advanced Alien Civilizations – And Are Hoping for a Reply in 25 Years". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 2017-11-17. Retrieved 2017-11-17.
  53. ^ "Perspective | Contacting aliens could end all life on earth. Let's stop trying". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 14 June 2021. Retrieved 23 July 2021.
  54. ^ Freitas, R. A. (1980). "Interstellar Probes: A new approach to SETI". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 33: 95–100. Bibcode:1980JBIS...33...95F. Archived from the original on 2016-04-14.
  55. ^ Scheffer, L. K. (2005). "A scheme for a high-power, low-cost transmitter for deep space applications". Radio Science. 40 (5): RS5012. Bibcode:2005RaSc...40.5012S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.585.9519. doi:10.1029/2005RS003243. S2CID 55878347.
  56. ^ Picon, Andres (8 November 2018). "Magnified laser from Earth could attract alien attention, MIT researcher says". Boston Globe.
[edit]
Library resources about
Active SETI
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Active_SETI&oldid=1252222990#Realized_projects"