Gathering of the Russian lands
In Russian historiography, the gathering of the Russian lands[a] (Russian: собирание русских земель) was the consolidation of a national state centered on Moscow. The sobriquet gatherer of the Russian lands[b] (Russian: собиратель русской земли, romanized: sobiratel' russkoi zemli)[2] is also given to the grand princes of Moscow by Russian historians, especially Ivan III.[3][4]
Origin of the phrase
[edit]According to scholar Charles J. Halperin (1973, 2022), the first time the idea of gathering Rus' lands appears in writing is in the vita of Dmitry "Donskoy" Ivanovich,[c] wherein his grandfather Ivan "Kalita" Danilovich is called the "gatherer of the Rus' Land".[5] The vita's dating is complicated,[6] with Jaroslaw Pelenski (1977) concluding it was probably written in 1454 or 1455.[7] Pelenski translated the opening passage of Donskoy's vita as follows:
"This Grand Prince Dmitrij was born to his honorable and venerable father, Grand Prince Ivan Ivanovič, and his mother, Grand Princess Aleksandra, and he was a grandson of Grand Prince Ivan Danilovič, the gatherer of the Russian land[s], [and] he was the most fertile branch and the most beautiful flower from the God-planted orchard of Car Vladimir, the New Constantine who baptized the Russian land, and he was [also] a kinsman (srodnik) of Boris and Gleb, the miracle-workers."[8]
History
[edit]The process culminated during the reign of Ivan III (r. 1462–1505), in which he established a unified monarchy.[9][10] Although various semi-independent princes still claimed certain territories during his reign, Ivan's overlordship was acknowledged by the princes.[11] By the 16th century, Ivan IV (r. 1533–1584) became the undisputed autocratic ruler of Russia and the policy of "gathering" Russian lands helped paved the way for Russian eastward expansion, including non-Russian territories.[12][13][14] According to Marc Raeff, this process became indistinguishable from imperial expansion with the annexation of the Astrakhan and Kazan khanates as well as the movements of the peasants into new territories.[15] Raeff says that "Indigenous groups mingled with Russians that had moved in, and transfers of population resulted in linguistic and cultural mixtures within the same administrative unit".[15] As a result, "Russian society remained largely unaware of the state’s having become a multinational empire".[15]
The term is also used to describe the expansion of not only the Grand Principality of Moscow, but also the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, each of which claimed to be the ruler of all of the territories inhabited by the East Slavs.[16][17]
Usage of the term
[edit]The concept arose in Russian tsarist-era historiography of the 19th century,[18] and the term could be found in works of several historians such as Dmitry Ilovaysky,[19] Kazimierz Waliszewski,[20][21] and many others. The concept has been used to justify the liquidation of feudal fragmentation in the post-Golden Horde period.[22]
In Soviet historiography, there were disputes between scholars over which polities had a "right" to gather the lands of Rus'.[18] The pre-1917 tradition, as represented by Igor Grekhov, argued that the Grand Duchy of Lithuania was predominantly populated by Eastern Slavs, and was therefore a legitimate gatherer.[18] On the other hand, the Soviet-era doctrine, as expressed by Vladimir Pashuto, regarded Moscow as the only legitimate gatherer, while Lithuania's expansion was considered to be outright aggression.[18] Ukrainian historian Serhii Plokhy (2006) cited the 1338 Lithuanian–Livonian Treaty as evidence that grand duke Gediminas of Lithuania was in effect a "gatherer of the Rus' lands", as the Middle Low German text distinguished Lettowen ("Lithuania") and Rusce ("Rus'"), Ruslande or Ruscelande ("Rus' Land" or "Ruthenia") as the two parts of the realm, inhabited by Lettowen ("Lithuanians") and Ruscen ("Rus'" or "Ruthenians"), both under the ret ("authority") of the koningh van Lettowen ("king of Lithuania"), where any visiting Dudesche kopman ("German merchant") and their goods would be under his legal protection.[23][24] Halperin (2022) questioned whether the 1338 Treaty described political rather than purely geographical dimensions of the Rus' Land.[24] On the other hand, he confirmed that in many sources such as the Hypatian Codex (including the Kievan Chronicle and Galician–Volhynian Chronicle), the Belarusian–Lithuanian Chronicles (including the Bychowiec Chronicle), the Eulogy for Vytautas, and the Hustyn Chronicle, the term "Rus' Land" is variously used as either comprising all the Ruthenian territories of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, or only its Belarusian territories, or (more rarely) only its Ukrainian territories, instead of Suzdalia and later Muscovy.[25]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Alternatively called the "gathering of the lands of Rus".[1]
- ^ Also referred to as the Rus' Land.[2]
- ^ Full title: Слово о житии и преставлении великого книазиа Дмитрииа Ивановича, тсариа руськаго (Slovo o zhitii i prestavlenii velikogo kniazia Dmitriia Ivanovicha, tsaria rus’kago; "Word about the life and repose of the great prince Dmitry Ivanovich, Tsar of Rus'").[5]
References
[edit]- ^ Kumar 2019, pp. 216, 226.
- ^ a b Halperin 2022, p. 21.
- ^ Moss 2003, p. 88, Of the two rulers, Ivan III (the Great) accomplished the most, and Russian historians have called him 'the gatherer of the Russian lands'.
- ^ Boyd 2019, p. 1027.
- ^ a b Halperin 2002, p. 21.
- ^ Pelenski 1977, pp. 29–52.
- ^ Pelenski 1977, p. 44.
- ^ Pelenski 1977, p. 40.
- ^ Wortman 2013, p. 10, The process of 'the gathering of the Russian lands' culminated during the reign of Ivan III, 1462–1505. Ivan... began to rule Russia as a unified monarchy.
- ^ Curtis 1998, p. 12, In the fourteenth century, the grand princes of Muscovy began gathering Russian lands... The most successful practitioner of this process was Ivan III... Muscovy gained full sovereignty over the ethnically Russian lands... by the beginning of the sixteenth century virtually all those lands were united.
- ^ Curtis 1998, p. 12, By the fifteenth century, the rulers of Muscovy considered the entire Russian territory their collective property. Various semi-independent princes still claimed specific territories, but Ivan III forced the lesser princes to acknowledge the grand prince of Muscovy and his descendants as unquestioned rulers with control over military, judicial, and foreign affairs.
- ^ Curtis 1998, p. 13.
- ^ Gibson 2011, p. 4, This legacy, coupled wih Muscovy's own aggressive policy of 'the gathering of the Russian lands' in order to consolidate the absolute rule of the Grand Prince of Moscow, resulted in the intensification and extension of Russian eastward expansion, especially after Ivan the Terrible's conquest.
- ^ Ragsdale & Ponomarev 1993, p. 6, Ivan IV improved the security of the nation by his conquest of the Tatar territories in the Volga basin... and the government continued to address itself seriously to the apparently genuinely national goal of 'the gathering of the Russian lands'.
- ^ a b c Vujačić 2015, p. 97.
- ^ Plokhy 2006, pp. 87–89.
- ^ Cox, Dunne & Booth 2001, p. 223, Moscow's seemingly fateful choice of identity as the 'gatherer of the Russian lands' functioned as a grand strategy for survival as an independent polity... Moreover, this expansion yielded the means eventually to halt and reverse the rapid westward advance of Poland-Lithuania, a rival claimant to the identity of 'gatherer of the Russian lands'.
- ^ a b c d Plokhy 2006, pp. 88.
- ^ Brief description of the book "History of Russia. Google ebook.
- ^ Brief description of the book "First Romanovs". Google ebook.
- ^ Brief description of the book "Ivan Grozny". Google ebook.
- ^ Объединение земель вокруг Москвы ("Unification of Russian lands around Moscow") Archived 2017-07-02 at the Wayback Machine. "Patriotic History". Ryazan: "Ryazan State University of Yesenin"
- ^ Plokhy 2006, pp. 95–96.
- ^ a b Halperin 2022, p. 96.
- ^ Halperin 2022, pp. 97–99.
Bibliography
[edit]Primary sources
[edit]- Salmina, M.A. (1985). "Cлово о житии великого князя Дмитрия Ивановича" [Word about the life of great prince Dmitry Ivanovich]. pushkinskijdom.ru (in Russian and Church Slavic). Retrieved 17 November 2024. (Original text of the Encomium to Ivanovich alias the vita of Dmitry Donskoy, in Church Slavonic; introduction and translation in modern Russian by M.A. Salmina).
Literature
[edit]- Boyd, Kelly (9 October 2019). Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-78764-5.
- Cox, Michael; Dunne, Timothy; Booth, Ken (2001). Empires, Systems and States: Great Transformations in International Politics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01686-5.
- Curtis, Glenn Eldon (1998). Russia: A Country Study. Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. ISBN 978-0-8444-0866-8.
- Halperin, Charles J. (2001). "Text and Textology: Salmina's Dating of the Chronicle Tales about Dmitrii Donskoi". Slavonic and East European Review. 79 (2): 248–263. doi:10.1353/see.2001.0046. S2CID 247621602. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
- Halperin, Charles J. (2022). The Rise and Demise of the Myth of the Rus' Land (PDF). Leeds: Arc Humanities Press. p. 107. ISBN 9781802700565. Retrieved 1 February 2023.
- Gibson, James R. (18 November 2011). Feeding the Russian Fur Trade: Provisionment of the Okhotsk Seaboard and the Kamchatka Peninsula, 1639–1856. University of Wisconsin Pres. ISBN 978-0-299-05233-1.
- Kumar, Krishan (6 August 2019). Visions of Empire: How Five Imperial Regimes Shaped the World. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-19280-2.
- Moss, Walter G. (1 July 2003). A History of Russia Volume 1: To 1917. Anthem Press. ISBN 978-1-84331-023-5.
- Pelenski, Jaroslaw (1977). "The origins of the official Muscovite claims to the "Kievan inheritance"". Harvard Ukrainian Studies. 1 (1). [President and Fellows of Harvard College, Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute]: 29–52. ISSN 0363-5570. JSTOR 41035738. Retrieved 17 November 2024.
- Plokhy, Serhii (2006). The Origins of the Slavic Nations: Premodern Identities in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus (PDF). New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 10–15. ISBN 978-0-521-86403-9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 June 2011. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
- Ragsdale, Hugh; Ponomarev, V. N. (29 October 1993). Imperial Russian Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44229-9.
- Vujačić, Veljko (26 March 2015). Nationalism, Myth, and the State in Russia and Serbia: Antecedents of the Dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia. Cambridge University Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-316-24060-1.
- Wortman, Richard S. (31 October 2013). Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy from Peter the Great to the Abdication of Nicholas II - New Abridged One-Volume Edition. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-4969-7.
