Jump to content

Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents case)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the prosecution relating to classified documents handling. For other prosecutions of Trump, see Indictments against Donald Trump.

United States v. Trump
Seal of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida
CourtUnited States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Full case name United States of America v. Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, and Carlos De Oliveira[1]
Docket nos.9:23-cr-80101-AMC[1]
Charge40 against Trump; 8 against Nauta; 4 against de Oliveira
Court membership
Judge sitting
This article is part of
a series about
Donald Trump
Business and personal
45th & 47th President of the
United States
Tenure
Policies
Appointments
Presidential campaigns
Impeachments
Civil and criminal prosecutions
COVID-19 pandemic
Donald Trump's signature
Seal of the President of the United States
Donald Trump's handling
of government documents
Classified intelligence material found during the FBI's search of Mar-a-Lago
Criminal laws and handling of government documents
Related groups and persons
Investigations
Events
Reactions

United States of America v. Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, and Carlos De Oliveira is a federal criminal case against Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States, Walt Nauta, his personal aide and valet, and Mar-a-Lago maintenance chief Carlos De Oliveira.[2][3] The grand jury indictment brought 40 felony counts against Trump related to his alleged mishandling of classified documents after his presidency, to which he pleaded not guilty.[4] The case marks the first federal indictment of a former U.S. president.[5]

On June 8, 2023, the original indictment with 37 felony counts against Trump was filed in the federal district court in Miami by the office of the Smith special counsel investigation.[6][7][8][9] On July 27, a superseding indictment charged an additional three felonies against Trump.[10][11][12] Trump was charged separately for each of 32 documents under the Espionage Act.[13][14] The other eight charges against him included making false statements and engaging in a conspiracy to obstruct justice. The most serious charges against Trump and Nauta carried a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. There were no mandatory minimum penalties.

Trump was arraigned on June 13, 2023,[15] Nauta was arraigned on July 12,[16] and both were arraigned on additional charges on August 10. De Oliveira was arraigned on August 15 on four criminal counts related to an alleged attempt to delete surveillance footage.[17] All pleaded not guilty to all charges. Though Judge Aileen Cannon initially set trial for May 20, 2024,[18] she postponed it[19] and then dismissed the case on July 15, ruling that the appointment of Smith had been unconstitutional.[20][21] The Special Counsel is appealing the dismissal.[22][23][24]

Following Trump's election in November 2024, the Justice Department was reportedly considering how to wind down the case, given that Trump as president will not allow the prosecution to continue.[25] Were it to continue, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel would need to decide on its own protocol for whether it would prosecute a president-elect. It has an existing protocol of not prosecuting sitting presidents.[26]

Background

[edit]
See also: FBI investigation into Donald Trump's handling of government documents, Smith special counsel investigation, and FBI search of Mar-a-Lago

Under the Presidential Records Act (PRA), presidential documents must be transferred to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) by the end of a president's term. Trump's term ended in January 2021. In May 2021, NARA became aware of missing documents from the Trump Administration, and began an effort to retrieve documents improperly taken to Trump's residences at Mar-a-Lago and The Bedminster Club.[27] Later, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) obtained evidence that Trump was personally involved in causing the documents to be taken.[1]

Storage room with document boxes at Mar-a-Lago

After repeatedly demanding the return of documents from Trump's team and warning them of a possible referral to the Justice Department, NARA retrieved 15 boxes of documents in January 2022.[1] NARA discovered that the boxes contained classified material, and notified the Justice Department on February 9, 2022. This led the FBI to launch an investigation into Trump's handling of government documents on March 30, 2022.[28] In May 2022, a grand jury issued a subpoena for any remaining documents in Trump's possession. Trump certified that he was returning all the remaining documents on June 3, 2022, but the FBI later obtained evidence that he had intentionally moved documents to hide them from his lawyers and the FBI and thus had not fulfilled the subpoena.[29][1]

This led to the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago on August 8, 2022, in which the FBI recovered over 13,000 government documents, over 300 of which were classified, with some relating to national defense secrets covered under the Espionage Act.[29] The civil lawsuit Trump v. United States arose from the search, which briefly led to the appointment of a special master by District Judge Aileen Cannon to review seized materials. Cannon's ruling was later overturned.[30][31]

In a November 2, 2022 interview with the FBI, a former Trump White House employee said that Nauta had been promised a pardon, "even if he gets charged with lying to the FBI", should Trump regain the presidency.[32][33]

In November 2022, the FBI investigation was taken over by a special counsel investigation, under the direction of Jack Smith who was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland.[34] A second civil case allowed the Smith investigation to make use of the crime-fraud exception to attorney–client privilege to access certain evidence in the case.[35]

In March 2023, the FBI initiated contact with Brian Butler, a 20-year-employee of Mar-a-Lago and longtime close friend of De Oliveira. Butler had helped move boxes of documents, not realizing what type of documents were inside nor others' intent to hide them. He provided information to investigators about the actions of De Oliveira and Nauta.[36]

In March 2023, Judge Beryl Howell wrote: "Notably, no excuse is provided as to how the former president could miss the classified-marked documents found in his own bedroom at Mar-a-Lago." Howell was referring to additional documents that Trump's attorneys found in his office and bedroom at Mar-a-Lago months after the FBI search, including a "mostly empty" folder marked as "Classified Evening Summary".[37]

Indictments and arraignments

[edit]

Original indictment

[edit]
Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks announcing the indictment.

The grand jury handed up the indictment under seal on June 8, 2023. The indictment was unsealed the following day, and special counsel Jack Smith gave a brief statement emphasizing the seriousness of the charges and stating that his office would seek a speedy trial.[38] In the court where the defendants were arraigned, scheduling trial within 70 days of a criminal indictment would normally be considered "speedy",[39] but the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) applies, and those required procedures may take additional time.[40] As the Guardian explains, "the seven-stage Cipa process is sequential, meaning each previous section has to be completed before the case can proceed to the next section."[41]

The indictment

Its 37 counts against Trump and six against Walt Nauta include willfully retaining national defense information in violation of the Espionage Act, making false statements, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy to obstruct justice.[7][9] The conspiracy to obstruct justice charge carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison; violations of the Espionage Act carry a penalty of up to 10 years in prison.[42][43][44] There are no mandatory minimum penalties.[45]

Trump (37 counts):[1]

  • 31 counts of retaining and failing to deliver national defense documents under the Espionage Act.
Each of these charges is for possession of a separate, specific document. Ten of these documents were handed over to the government in June 2022, and the other 21 were recovered in the August 2022 search.[46] According to the indictment, the 31 documents describe U.S. nuclear weapons; foreign military attacks, plans, capabilities, and effects on U.S. interests; foreign nuclear capabilities; foreign support for terrorist activity; communications with foreign leaders; U.S. military activities; White House daily foreign intelligence briefings; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.[47]
  • 5 counts relating to conspiracy to obstruct justice and withholding documents and records[1]
  • 1 count of making false statements.

Nauta (6 counts):[1]

  • 5 counts relating to conspiracy to obstruct justice and withholding documents and records[1]
  • 1 count of making false statements.
Boxes of documents found in a Mar-a-Lago bathroom by the FBI

The indictment included photographs showing boxes containing classified information in "a ballroom, a bathroom and shower, an office space, his bedroom and a storage room" at Trump's Florida home.[48] Boxes containing classified materials were stored on a stage in the White and Gold ballroom, where events took place, from January to March 2021, before being moved to the Mar-a-Lago business center.[49][50]

It included transcripts of an audio recording it says are of Trump showing a classified U.S. military attack plan (the name of the target country is redacted) to a book publisher, writer, and two staff members in July 2021, while saying he was unable to declassify the document. News reports said the target country was Iran that and Trump was showing the document to the writers while complaining that General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had unfairly portrayed him to the media.[51] Milley later told a journalist: "Our job is to render advice. We have plans for all kinds of things ... Not one time have I ever recommended to attack Iran."[52]

Originally, the indictment alleged that in fall 2021, Trump showed a classified military map to a representative of his political action committee (PAC) (later identified in the press as Susie Wiles, CEO of his Save America PAC)[53] who did not have a security clearance, and that Trump acted to keep classified documents he knew he could not be in possession of because they had been subpoenaed.[3] However, on June 10, 2024, Judge Cannon ordered that the paragraph about the map be removed from the indictment. She said it was unnecessary since Trump was not being charged for the alleged map incident.[54]

Superseding indictment

[edit]

Shortly after Trump and Nauta's original indictment in June, a target letter was sent to Yuscil Taveras, the director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago who oversees the surveillance cameras.[55] At first, Taveras was represented by attorney Stanley Woodward, whose legal fees were paid for by Trump's Save America PAC to represent Taveras and a number of Trump allies.[56] While represented by Woodward, Taveras provided testimony to the grand jury. On July 5, after being told that Woodward might have a conflict of interest, Taveras notified the court he wished to drop Woodward as his attorney and to switch to a public defender.[57] Taveras then retracted his previous testimony and provided new information regarding a plot to delete surveillance video at the Florida property that implicated Trump and others.[56][58] This led to a superseding indictment in which Taveras was not charged.[59] He agreed to testify for the prosecution.[60]

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

On July 27, a superseding indictment was filed, charging an additional defendant, Carlos De Oliveira, the maintenance chief at Mar-a-Lago, and adding new counts for Trump and Nauta. In the new indictment, all three defendants face two counts related to the attempt to delete the surveillance footage:

  • "Altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing an object" (Title 18 USC Sections 1512(b)(2)(B) and 2)
  • "Corruptly altering, destroy, mutilating or concealing a document, record, or other object" (Title 18 USC Section 1512(c)(1))

In the new indictment, Trump also faces an additional count of willful retention of national defense information under the Espionage Act. The 32nd document is the Iran document he referenced in the July 2021 conversation. The indictment says that he possessed it until January 17, 2022, so it may have been inside the 15 boxes of material he voluntarily surrendered to NARA that month (before the subpoenas and search).

Charging Trump with these three new counts brings his total number of counts to 40.[10][12]

Assignment of district judge

[edit]

Federal judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed to the bench by Trump in 2020, was randomly assigned to preside over the case. Shortly after her assignment in June 2023, two federal judges urged her to step down, but she did not.[61]

Cannon had previously made unprecedented rulings favorable to Trump in 2022, particularly in appointing a special master to review seized documents, which temporarily stymied the FBI and special counsel investigations. The rulings were criticized by legal scholars, and a panel of the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit unanimously overruled them, writing, "We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so."[62][63][64]

Arraignments

[edit]

Trump arrived in Miami the day before his arraignment at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse[65] and had dinner at his golf club in Doral with his lawyer Christopher Kise; Nauta; Nauta's Washington DC lawyer Stanley Woodward; right-wing activist and President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton; and other advisers.[66]

Trump

[edit]

At his June 13 arraignment, Trump pleaded not guilty to all 37 counts. Trump and Nauta were both released. Trump was instructed not to speak about the case to any of the 84 witnesses,[67] including Nauta, who continues to be Trump's personal assistant.[68] Trump was represented by Todd Blanche, a former assistant U.S. attorney in the Manhattan federal prosecutor's office who is also representing him in his prosecution by the Manhattan district attorney. (Trump attorneys Jim Trusty [wd] and John Rowley [wd] had resigned the day after the indictment.)[69] At the arraignment, Blanche entered the plea on Trump's behalf.[70] At Trump's arraignment, Miami police had prepared for up to 50,000 protestors, though only 500 protestors came.[71][72]

Trump is also represented in the matter by Lindsey Halligan.[73][74][75][76] Halligan is the local counsel for the case and filed the Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Evan Corcoran and James Trusty, initially on August 22, 2022.[77][78] She was one of the few lawyers working for Trump who was on site during the FBI search, which she said was a "huge surprise".[79][80][81] She said Trump's subsequent indictment goes "for the jugular".[82][83]

On August 4, in a court filing, Trump pleaded not guilty to the three new counts. He told the court he would not appear in person for the arraignment.[4] At the August 10 arraignment, the judge formally accepted the plea he had submitted.[84]

Nauta

[edit]

On June 13, Nauta appeared in court,[85] but he could not be arraigned because his lawyer was not eligible to represent him in Florida.[86] On July 6, Nauta, having hired a Florida lawyer, Sasha Dadan, pleaded not guilty.[87] On August 10, he appeared in court again and pleaded not guilty to the added charges.[84]

De Oliveira

[edit]

On July 31, De Oliveira appeared in court and was released on $100,000 bond.[88] He is represented by John Irving, whose firm has been paid nearly $200,000 by Trump's Save America PAC.[89] His arraignment was delayed because he did not have a Florida lawyer.[84] He was arraigned on August 15 and pleaded not guilty.[17]

Pretrial proceedings

[edit]
Post-arraignment proceedings are being held at the Alto Lee Adams, Sr. U.S. Courthouse in Fort Pierce, Florida

The trial will involve procedures under the Classified Information Procedures Act.[90] Under that act, the government plans to share classified documents relevant to the case with the defense as part of discovery. On June 19, a judge issued a protective order that restricted Trump to viewing the relevant documents under his attorneys' supervision and explicitly prohibited him from publicly discussing the evidence,[91] as DOJ had requested three days earlier.[92]

2023

[edit]

By the third week of June, the government began disclosing unclassified evidence to the defense as part of the discovery process.[90] That includes documents obtained via warrants and subpoenas; transcripts of witness testimony before the grand jury; witness interviews; and copies of the videorecordings from Mar-a-Lago.[90] The government's first discovery disclosure to the defense included at least 833,450 pages of material, including emails and other documents;[93] of this set, about 4,500 pages were designated as "key" documents, the most crucial evidence.[94][95]

On July 18, lawyers for Trump and Nauta attended the first pretrial conference, while Trump went to Iowa for a televised campaign event with Sean Hannity.[96][97][98] Several days later, the judge set another pretrial hearing for May 14, 2024.[18]

On August 22, prosecutors made a court filing asking whether Stanley Woodward may have a conflict of interest if he has to cross-examine Taveras, who was formerly his client.[99] At an October 12 hearing, Cannon complained that prosecutors had introduced new arguments during oral argument and said she would potentially schedule further hearings about the matter in the future.[100]

Following a September 12 hearing (postponed from August 25), Cannon prohibited Trump from commenting on classified evidence.[101][102]

Earlier in 2023, in a different case, Cannon closed jury selection to the public on the basis that the courtroom was too small, which according to some was a constitutional error. Trump's trial was scheduled for the same courtroom.[103]

In November, it was reported that Mar-a-Lago staff, including the person who cleaned Trump's bedroom, may be called to testify.[104]

2024

[edit]

On February 6, 2024, Cannon ruled that witnesses' names could be made public, as the government had not explained its concerns related to "witness safety and intimidation".[105] Two days later, the government asked her to reconsider.[106] On April 9, Cannon ruled that witnesses in the case could remain private, reversing her prior decision.[107] However, Cannon also did turn down a request seeking the sealing of substantive witness statements.[108]

On February 12, Trump attended a hearing to determine whether prosecutors could withhold some classified evidence from the defense. The hearing was closed-door and in a sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF).[109]

On February 22, Trump's lawyers made multiple court filings asking for the case to be dismissed.[110] On March 14, Cannon heard two of these motions, and she immediately rejected Trump's request to dismiss the case based on his claim that the Espionage Act was vague, though she is open to hearing his arguments about the law's vagueness as part of the case.[111] Trump's second claim was that a president may keep any government documents he wishes under the Presidential Records Act.[112]

On April 4, Cannon denied Trump's motion to dismiss the indictment. Trump had claimed that a president, under the Presidential Records Act, may keep any government documents he wishes. Cannon ruled that the Presidential Records Act provides no "basis to dismiss" the charges.[113]

On May 6, Cannon delayed a major deadline for the defendants to submit court filings (which had been set for May 9). She did this after it was revealed that prosecutors had shuffled the order of documents within each box while reviewing the boxes. As prosecutors acknowledged in writing: "The filter team took care to ensure that no documents were moved from one box to another, but it was not focused on maintaining the sequence of documents within each box." Trump attorney Todd Blanche described this as "the spoliation of this evidence" and said that prosecutors had committed an ethical breach by not revealing it promptly.[114]

On May 7, Cannon canceled the May 20 trial date and wrote that it would be "imprudent and inconsistent" to finalize a new trial date before resolving pretrial issues. She issued a new pretrial schedule, under which defendants' motions to dismiss will be heard May 22 and June 21, there is a CIPA deadline on June 17 (delayed from May 9),[115] defendants’ combined speedy trial report will be due July 19, and a status conference and a CIPA hearing will be held on July 22.[116]

On May 22, a new pre-trial hearing was held concerning motions to dismiss brought forth by Nauta on the grounds of "vindictive prosecution" and by Trump and his co-defendants concerning "technical flaws" within the indictment.[117] Stanley Woodward alleged that prosecutor Jay Bratt had once referenced the fact that Woodward had been recommended for a judgeship, as if to threaten him if he did not succeed in convincing Nauta to cooperate. Prosecutor David Harbach pointed out that Woodward did not report the alleged incident until months after the August 2022 meeting at which it supposedly happened.[118] Prior to the hearing, the release of previously sealed court files revealed that a federal judge had previously found that there was "sufficient evidence" that Trump obstructed justice, enabling investigators to obtain information that would normally be protected under attorney-client privilege.[119] The judge, in doing so, had cited the fact that Trump attorneys had found further documents in Trump's bedroom.[120]

On May 24, Jack Smith's office asked Cannon to place a gag order on Trump related to his "repeated mischaracterization" of the actions of law enforcement officials.[121] Three days earlier, Trump had begun falsely claiming that Joe Biden had been ready to kill him during the FBI search,[122] an unprecedented accusation.[123] In making this accusation, Trump was referencing a standard law enforcement policy, a copy of which had been attached to the FBI's description of the planned search of Mar-a-Lago, which states that officers are authorized to use lethal force if there is "imminent danger of death or serious physical injury". The FBI had taken steps to ensure that Trump would not be present during the search and had given advance notice to the Secret Service.[124][125] On May 27, Trump's lawyers said that the gag order request was an "extraordinary, unprecedented, and unconstitutional censorship application" and was "bad-faith behavior" on the part of government prosecutors.[126] On May 28, Cannon denied the request, saying that prosecutors had not given sufficient advance notice to the defense.[127]

On June 5, Cannon postponed a multi-day proceeding for Trump's team to question federal officials under oath, and she did not set a new date for it.[128]

On June 10, Cannon denied a motion to dismiss by Trump who claimed the indictment was improper; however, Cannon struck a paragraph from Smith's superseding indictment, finding it "inappropriate".[54]

Three days of hearings were held in late June. (Cannon had set these on June 5.)[129] They were to include the prosecution request for a gag order, the defense request to have Jack Smith's appointment as special counsel declared invalid, and the defense request to throw out evidence seized by the FBI or provided by Evan Corcoran.[128] The hearing on Jack Smith's appointment was to include arguments by friends of the court: Josh Blackman and Gene Schaerr in Trump's favor, and Matthew Seligman in Smith's favor.[130] Following hearings on June 21[131] and 24,[132] the prosecution submitted a 30-page court filing in which they reaffirmed that they had maintained the "integrity of each container in which the evidence was found, that is, box-to-box integrity." Given "the haphazard manner" in which Trump had combined "some of the nation's most highly guarded secrets" with "newspapers, thank you notes, Christmas ornaments, magazines, clothing, and photographs of himself and others", investigators having further shuffled the material within each seized box should not be "critical to his defense", they argued. They also pointed out that the defense's new argument that the order of the documents inside each box could prove Trump's unawareness of their presence contradicts the defense's previous claim that Trump had declassified the documents and designated them as his personal property.[133] The third day of hearings was June 25. Following that, Cannon did not rule from the bench.[134]

On June 27, regarding Trump's motion to suppress the use of certain evidence, Cannon said an evidentiary hearing was justified. At such a hearing, she would hear witness testimony and review evidence to decide whether it could be used at trial. She did not set a date for the evidentiary hearing. She requested more information about the FBI warrant for the 2022 search of Mar-a-Lago and about Corcoran's grand jury testimony.[135]

On July 5, Trump's team requested a new schedule to reflect the recent outcome of Trump v. United States in which the Supreme Court gave former presidents presumptive immunity for official acts.[136] The next day, to allow briefs to be submitted on the issue, Cannon paused filing deadlines for two weeks.[137]

Trump's request to indefinitely delay trial

[edit]

Cannon set an administrative placeholder date for a trial.[90][138] The prosecution requested that the trial start on December 11, 2023—a relatively short delay—to give the defense more time to review discovery material, obtain security clearance, and properly handle classified evidence.[90] The case could be delayed several months beyond what the government asked for.[15] Prosecutors told the court that the trial should still proceed expeditiously given its significance and because the case "involves straightforward theories of liability" and presented neither "novel questions of fact" nor "unusual or complex" legal issues.[90]

In a July 11, 2023, court filing, Trump and Nauta asked the court to indefinitely delay their trial.[93] Their attorneys argued that it would be "challenging" to prepare for trial while Trump spent his "time and energy" on the presidential campaign trail and that it would be hard to find a "fair and impartial" jury.[93][139][140] In its reply two days later, prosecutors argued that there was "no basis in law or fact" for such an "indeterminate and open-ended" delay, and they asked for trial to begin December 11.[94][95] On July 21, Cannon set the trial to begin on May 20, 2024.[141] In October, the Trump team asked to delay the trial until after the 2024 election.[142] On November 10, Cannon said it was too early to decide whether to delay the trial. She delayed deadlines for filing and responding to motions, and she said she would reconsider the trial date at a March 1, 2024 scheduling conference.[143] On November 16, Cannon said she would likewise wait until the March 1 hearing to give Trump a deadline for saying which classified evidence he will use at trial. That deadline would likely be about one month from the time it is set; if so, it would be an April deadline. Because of the sequential nature of pretrial deadlines under the Classified Information Procedures Act, Cannon's decision had, according to The Guardian, effectively delayed the trial by four months.[41] Legal experts, including national security attorney Bradley Moss and former federal prosecutor Brandon Van Grack, said the original trial date of May 2024 was now implausible, while former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance said Cannon was "on track to delay past the election."[144]

At the March 1 hearing, Cannon did not make any decisions.[145] Prosecutors proposed holding the trial on July 8. The defense continued to request that the trial be held after the election, but proposed August 12 as an alternative,[146] a date that might overlap (and therefore interfere) with the trial on federal charges of election obstruction.[147]

On March 18, Cannon gave each side two weeks to propose jury instructions.[148] Each side must provide two sets: an instruction for the jury to decide whether each of the various records Trump kept should be considered "personal" or "presidential" under the Presidential Records Act, and another instruction that assumes Trump was permitted to take anything he wanted anyway. On April 2, the special prosecutor said that these different interpretations of the Presidential Records Act are irrelevant to assessing whether Trump violated the Espionage Act.[149]

In an April 14 court filing, Smith asked that the defendants "not be allowed to use their overlapping engagements to perpetually delay trial".[150]

Dismissal and appeal

[edit]

On July 15, 2024, Cannon dismissed the case against Trump, ruling that "Special Counsel Smith’s appointment violates the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution." The rationale mirrored Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' concurrence in Trump v. United States, released two weeks prior.[20][151] In doing so, Cannon ruled a key portion of the 1974 Supreme Court case United States v. Nixon to be non-binding because the specific issue of that special prosecutor's validity had not been sufficiently contested or considered by that court.[152]

On July 17, with permission from the Justice Department,[153][154] Special Counsel Smith filed a notice of appeal,[22] and on August 26 he asked the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reinstate the case. The appeals court also has the power to reassign the case to another judge, though Smith did not request it.[155]

The filing noted the distinction in the Appointments Clause of "inferior officers" who can be appointed directly by the head of an agency without presidential appointment and Senate confirmation, as would be necessary for principal officers. Prosecutors, disputing Cannon's ruling that found no specific statute permitted Garland's appointment of Smith, asserted that at least four statutes empower an attorney general to appoint a special counsel, and such authority had been acknowledged by courts dating to the prosecution of Jefferson Davis after the Civil War. The filing added:

The Attorney General validly appointed the Special Counsel, In ruling otherwise, the district court deviated from binding Supreme Court precedent, misconstrued the statutes that authorized the Special Counsel's appointment, and took inadequate account of the longstanding history of Attorney General appointments of special counsels.[24][156]

On September 3, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a brief arguing against the dismissal. “If the court reverses Judge Aileen M. Cannon’s ruling in this matter," CREW wrote, "it will be the third time in under three years" that it reverses one of her rulings in the documents case. CREW also argued that Cannon should be removed from the case.[157]

Trump was elected to the presidency in November 2024. Two weeks before the election, ABC News (United States) reported that the Trump campaign was considering naming Cannon as U.S. Attorney General. After Cannon dismissed the documents case, Trump advisers including Boris Epshteyn placed her name second on a list of nearly a dozen candidates for Attorney General in a document called "Transition Planning: Legal Principals". Trump's lead attorney Todd Blanche was listed as a candidate for Deputy Attorney General and White House Counsel, and (according to other sources) for FBI Director. Nauta's attorney Stanley Woodward was also being considered for White House Counsel and other top positions.[158] On October 23, CREW renewed its call to remove Cannon from the case, saying that she, as a "potential attorney general...can never be impartial in the classified documents case".[159]

Response

[edit]

To indictment

[edit]

Trump

[edit]

After the indictment, Trump and his allies within the Republican Party escalated verbal attacks on the FBI, Justice Department, and federal prosecutors, whom Trump denounced in a speech to the Georgia Republican Party as "cowards", "fascists and thugs", and "sinister forces" days following his indictment.[160] Trump has repeatedly referred to the case as the "boxes hoax".[161]

Trump falsely asserted during the days after his indictment that under the PRA he "had every right to have these documents." Legal experts said there was no basis for his claim that the PRA superseded the Espionage Act under which he was charged. He said, "The Espionage Act has been used to go after traitors and spies. It has nothing to do with a former president legally keeping his own documents," though, despite its name, that act is not limited to espionage allegations. Trump also cited the so-called "Clinton socks case," a 2010 lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch arguing that audio recordings of interviews President Bill Clinton had given during his presidency must be turned over to NARA, though the NARA had never sought them as presidential records. A federal judge dismissed the Clinton lawsuit because Judicial Watch had no standing to bring it. Trump incorrectly insisted Clinton had won and that the court had recognized Clinton's right to the recordings.[162][163]

On June 19, 2023, Trump was interviewed by Bret Baier of Fox News. When Baier asked why he hadn't simply handed over his boxes, Trump replied "Before I send boxes over, I have to take all of my things out. These boxes were interspersed with all sorts of things" and that he worried they might contain "golf shirts, clothing, pants, shoes". He claimed he felt at the time: "I don’t want to hand that over to NARA yet." He said he had not dealt with the request because he had been "very busy". He also maintained he had already "declassified" all documents in his possession.[164][165]

On July 15, 2023, Trump gave a speech to the Turning Point Action Conference, claiming: "Whatever documents a president decides to take with him, he has the absolute and unquestioned right to do so." He falsely added: "This was a law that was passed and signed."[166]

On September 6, 2023, again citing the Presidential Records Act, Trump told radio host Hugh Hewitt: "I'm allowed to do whatever I want."[167]

On September 14, 2023, Trump was interviewed by Megyn Kelly for SiriusXM. He said: "I'm allowed to take these documents, classified or not classified. And frankly, when I have them, they become unclassified. People think you have to go through a ritual. You don’t — at least in my opinion, you don't."[168]

On October 24, 2024, Trump said in a radio interview that if he is elected, "I would fire him [Jack Smith] within two seconds."[169]

Other Republicans

[edit]

Many congressional Republicans responded to the indictment by asserting, without evidence, that Trump was being targeted for political purposes by a Justice Department "weaponized" by President Joe Biden,[170][171] although an independent special counsel oversaw the investigation and a grand jury made the charging decision.[172] Trump allies who rallied around the ex-president after the indictment included the House Republican leadership (Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik), as well as Senator JD Vance.[171]

Trump allies engaged in violent rhetoric after the indictment, depicting the indictment as an "act of war" and calling for retribution. Among others, Republican congressman Andy Biggs, Trump-endorsed House candidate Joe Kent, and former Republican Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake made allusions to the use of violence in their attacks on the federal indictment.[173]

Most members of the Senate Republican leadership team, including minority leader Mitch McConnell and minority whip John Thune, stayed silent on the indictment.[171] Senator Mitt Romney of Utah said in a statement that Trump "brought these charges upon himself ... by refusing to simply return them when given numerous opportunities to do so."[174] Former U.S. Representative Adam Kinzinger, a Republican critic of Trump, wrote, "Today, Justice is being served. Nobody is above the law. The former President will get a fair trial. The former President will be held accountable."[175] Former Attorney General under Trump William Barr said it was ridiculous to present Trump as the victim of a witch hunt: "It's a very detailed indictment. And it's very, very damning ... He's not a victim here."[176][177]

By August, House Republicans were seeking to use their power of the purse to halt investigations and prosecutions of Trump. Some proposed leveraging the looming September 30 deadline to fund the government for the coming year in order to trigger a federal shutdown, though none of the federal or state actions against Trump would be affected by a shutdown.[178]

On March 19, 2024, at Mar-a-Lago, Roger Stone told journalist Ally Sammarco: "I think the judge is on the verge of dismissing the charges against him in Florida" (according to Rolling Stone).[2]

Democrats

[edit]

The top Democratic leadership in Congress — Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer and House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries — released a statement urging both critics and supporters of Trump to let the case "proceed peacefully".[179] President Biden declined to comment on the indictment.[180]

To dismissal

[edit]

On July 30, 2024, Attorney General Merrick Garland spoke to Ken Dilanian on NBC Nightly News, Garland said he disagreed with Cannon's ruling that his appointment of the special counsel had been unconstitutional. He said: "For more than 20 years, I was a federal judge. Do I look like somebody who would make that basic mistake about the law? I don’t think so."[181]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i Savage, Charlie (June 9, 2023). "The Trump Classified Documents Indictment, Annotated". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  2. ^ a b Fisher, Joe; Schrader, Adam (June 8, 2023). "Donald Trump charged in handling of classified documents". United Press International. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  3. ^ a b Lowell, Hugo; Chao-Fong, Léonie (June 9, 2023). "Indictment charging Trump with mishandling classified documents unsealed". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  4. ^ a b Sneed, Tierney (August 4, 2023). "Trump pleads not guilty twice in 24 hours with plea to new charges in classified documents case". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on August 5, 2023. Retrieved August 5, 2023.
  5. ^ Baker, Peter (June 10, 2023). "Trump's Case Puts the Justice System on Trial, in a Test of Public Credibility". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  6. ^ Druker, Simon (June 9, 2023). "37 charges against Donald Trump include retention of intel, obstruction of justice". United Press International. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  7. ^ a b Barrett, Devlin; Stein, Perry; Dawsey, Josh (June 8, 2023). "Trump indicted in Mar-a-Lago classified documents investigation". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  8. ^ Feuer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie; Rashbaum, William K.; Protess, Ben (June 9, 2023). "Justice Department Charges Trump in Documents Case". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  9. ^ a b Faulders, Katherine (June 8, 2023). "Donald Trump indicted for 2nd time, in classified documents investigation". ABC News. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  10. ^ a b Mangan, Dan; Breuninger, Kevin (July 27, 2023). "Trump hit with new charges in classified documents case, third defendant added". CNBC. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
  11. ^ "Superseding Indictment" (PDF). U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida. July 27, 2023. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 27, 2023.
  12. ^ a b Pequeño IV, Antonio (July 27, 2023). "Trump Charged With 3 New Felonies In Mar-A-Lago Classified Documents Case". Forbes. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
  13. ^ Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (June 9, 2023). "Trump indictment unsealed". Politico. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  14. ^ Polantz, Katelyn (July 28, 2023). "Trump team wants to discuss classified information at his house rather than in a secure space, prosecutors say". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on August 5, 2023. Retrieved August 7, 2023.
  15. ^ a b Lowell, Hugo (June 28, 2023). "Trump classified documents trial could be delayed until spring 2024". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved June 29, 2023.
  16. ^ "Trump valet Walt Nauta pleads not guilty in classified documents case". Politico. Associated Press. July 6, 2023. Archived from the original on July 11, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
  17. ^ a b Nottingham, Shawn (August 15, 2023). "Trump property manager pleads not guilty". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
  18. ^ a b Polantz, Katelyn; Sneed, Tierney; Scannell, Kara (July 21, 2023). "Judge sets May 2024 trial date for Donald Trump in documents case". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on July 22, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  19. ^ Cheney, Kyle (May 7, 2024). "Judge Cannon indefinitely postpones Trump's classified docs trial". Politico. Retrieved May 7, 2024.
  20. ^ a b Johnson, Carrie (July 15, 2024). "Judge Cannon dismisses Trump documents case". NPR. Retrieved July 15, 2024.
  21. ^ Cannon, Aileen (July 15, 2024). "Order Granting Motion To Dismiss Superseding Indictment Based On Appointments Clause Violation" (PDF). District Court for the Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Division. Retrieved August 20, 2024 – via courtlistener.com.
  22. ^ a b Mallin, Alexander (July 17, 2024). "Special counsel files notice of appeal in Trump's classified documents case". ABC News. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
  23. ^ Smith, Jack (July 17, 2024). "Notice of Appeal" (PDF). District Court for the Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Division. Retrieved August 20, 2024 – via courthousenews.com.
  24. ^ a b Tucker, Eric (August 26, 2024). "Special counsel urges appeals court to reinstate classified documents case against Trump". AP News. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
  25. ^ Dilanian, Ken; Jarrett, Laura (November 6, 2024). "DOJ moving to wind down Trump criminal cases before he takes office". NBC News. Retrieved November 7, 2024.
  26. ^ Cole, Devan; del Valle, Lauren; Scannell, Kara; Herb, Jeremy (November 6, 2024). "What happens to Trump's criminal and civil cases now that he's been reelected". CNN. Retrieved November 6, 2024.
  27. ^ Broadwater, Luke; Benner, Katie; Haberman, Maggie (August 27, 2022). "Inside the 20-Month Drive to Get Trump to Return Presidential Material". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  28. ^ Montague, Zach; McCarthy, Lauren (August 9, 2022). "The Timeline Related to the F.B.I.'s Search of Mar-a-Lago". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  29. ^ a b Smart, Charlie; Buchanan, Larry (September 3, 2022). "What the F.B.I. Seized From Mar-a-Lago, Illustrated". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 5, 2022. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  30. ^ Sneed, Tierney (December 1, 2022). "Appeals court halts special master review of documents seized at Mar-a-Lago in major defeat for Trump". CNN. Archived from the original on December 1, 2022. Retrieved December 2, 2022.
  31. ^ Feuer, Alan; Savage, Charlie (December 1, 2022). "Appeals Court Scraps Special Master Review in Trump Documents Case". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved December 4, 2022.
  32. ^ "Interview of Person 16" (PDF). storage.courtlistener.com. April 23, 2024. p. 9. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  33. ^ Visser, Nick (April 23, 2024). "Trump's Valet Promised Pardon Even If He Lied To FBI In Classified Docs Case, Witness Claims". HuffPost. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
  34. ^ Thrush, Glenn; Savage, Charlie; Haberman, Maggie; Feuer, Alan (November 18, 2022). "Special Counsel for Trump Investigations: Garland Names Special Counsel for Trump Inquiries". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 26, 2023. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  35. ^ Feuer, Alan; Protess, Ben; Haberman, Maggie (March 22, 2023). "Appeals Court Orders Trump Lawyer to Hand Over Records in Documents Inquiry". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  36. ^ Polantz, Katelyn; Collins, Kaitlan; Herb, Jeremy (March 11, 2024). "Exclusive: 'Trump Employee 5,' who unknowingly helped move classified documents, speaks out". CNN. Retrieved March 11, 2024.
  37. ^ Sneed, Tierney; Polantz, Katelyn; Lybrand, Holmes; Rabinowitz, Hannah (May 21, 2024). "Federal judge found 'strong evidence' of crimes before Trump was charged in classified documents case". CNN. Retrieved May 22, 2024.
  38. ^ Treisman, Rachel (June 9, 2023). "These are the charges Trump was indicted on and what they mean". NPR. Archived from the original on June 12, 2023. Retrieved June 12, 2023.
  39. ^ Pereira, Ivan; Bruggeman, Lucien; Katersky, Aaron (June 13, 2023). "Trump federal indictment: What happens next?". ABC News. Archived from the original on June 16, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
  40. ^ Barrett, Devlin; Stein, Perry (June 19, 2023). "How government rules for classified papers could help Trump delay his trial". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on June 18, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2023.
  41. ^ a b Lowell, Hugo (November 17, 2023). "Trump classified documents trial running about four months behind schedule". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved November 17, 2023.
  42. ^ Tucker, Eric; Richer, Alanna Durkin (June 15, 2023). "How much prison time could Trump face? Past cases brought steep punishment for document hoarders". Associated Press. Retrieved March 12, 2024.
  43. ^ Mangan, Dan; Breuninger, Kevin (July 27, 2023). "Trump hit with new charges in classified documents case, third defendant added". CNBC. Retrieved March 12, 2024.
  44. ^ Narea, Nicole (June 9, 2023). "Your 5 biggest questions about Trump's first federal indictment, answered". Vox. Retrieved March 12, 2024.
  45. ^ Weiner, Rachel; Stein, Perry (August 16, 2023). "Details of the 40 charges Trump faces in classified documents case". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 12, 2024.
  46. ^ Barrett, Devlin; Stein, Perry; Hsu, Spencer S.; Dawsey, Josh (July 28, 2023). "Trump charged with seeking to delete security footage in documents case". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
  47. ^ Santucci, John; Pereira, Ivan (June 9, 2023). "Sweeping 37-count indictment alleges Trump hoarded national secrets, orchestrated obstruction of investigation". ABC News. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  48. ^ Price, Michelle L. (June 9, 2023). "Key moments in Trump indictment: Flaunting classified material, stowing boxes in Mar-a-Lago bathroom". Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  49. ^ Bailey, Chelsea (June 9, 2023). "Boxes in the bathroom, boxes on stage: Pictures from Trump charges". BBC. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
  50. ^ "Photos from Trump indictment show boxes of classified documents stored in Mar-a-Lago shower, ballroom". PBS NewsHour. Associated Press. June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
  51. ^ Reid, Paula; Herb, Jeremy (June 9, 2023). "Exclusive: Donald Trump admits on tape he didn't declassify 'secret information'". CNN. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  52. ^ Zakaria, Fareed (September 14, 2023). "Gen. Milley refutes controversial claim made by Trump". CNN Politics. Retrieved September 14, 2023.
  53. ^ Collins, Kaitlan; Holmes, Kristen; Reid, Paula; Murray, Sara (June 29, 2023). "Top Trump campaign aide Susie Wiles met numerous times with special counsel investigators in documents probe". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved June 29, 2023.
  54. ^ a b Lybrand, Holmes; Sneed, Tierney; Rabinowitz, Hannah (June 11, 2024). "Judge Aileen Cannon denies effort by Trump and co-defendants to dismiss some charges in classified documents case". CNN. Retrieved June 11, 2024.
  55. ^ Cohen, Zachary; Collins, Kaitlan; Polantz, Katelyn (July 30, 2023). "Mar-a-Lago employee overseeing surveillance cameras previously received target letter in Trump classified documents probe". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on July 30, 2023. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
  56. ^ a b Tucker, Eric (August 22, 2023). "Key witness in Trump classified docs case retracted false testimony after switching lawyers, special counsel says". NBC Miami. Associated Press. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  57. ^ Barnes, Daniel; Gregorian, Dareh (August 22, 2023). "A key witness in the Trump classified docs case changed his testimony after switching lawyers, special counsel says". NBC News. Retrieved August 23, 2023.
  58. ^ Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (August 22, 2023). "Prosecutors: Trump Mar-a-Lago security aide flipped after changing lawyers". Politico. Retrieved August 23, 2023.
  59. ^ O'Donnell, Lawrence (July 28, 2023). "Lawrence: We now know who the star witness in the Trump docs case will be". MSNBC. Archived from the original on August 4, 2023 – via YouTube.
  60. ^ Rabinowitz, Hannah (September 6, 2023). "Mar-a-Lago IT worker struck cooperation agreement with special counsel, his former lawyer says". CNN. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
  61. ^ Rabinowitz, Hannah (June 20, 2024). "New York Times: 2 federal judges urged Aileen Cannon to step down from Trump case". CNN. Retrieved June 20, 2024.
  62. ^ Kinnard, Meg; Anderson, Curt; Tucker, Eric (June 9, 2023). "Trump case assigned to judge who faced criticism over her ruling in his favor in Mar-a-Lago search". Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  63. ^ "The judge assigned to oversee Trump's criminal case was appointed by Trump himself". NPR. June 9, 2023. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  64. ^ Savage, Charlie (June 10, 2023). "Trump Appointee Will Remain Judge in Documents Case, Clerk Says". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
  65. ^ O'Connor, Lydia (June 12, 2023). "Trump Arrives In Miami For First Court Appearance Over Documents Charges". HuffPost. Archived from the original on June 13, 2023. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  66. ^ Alemany, Jacqueline; Dawsey, Josh; Hsu, Spencer S.; Ovalle, David (June 14, 2023). "Will Walt Nauta flip? Trump keeps valet close as question hovers over the case". Archived from the original on June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  67. ^ Stein, Perry (June 27, 2023). "Judge Cannon sets pretrial conference in Trump document case for July 14". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on June 27, 2023. Retrieved June 27, 2023.
  68. ^ Reilly, Mollie (June 13, 2023). "No Bail, No Travel Restrictions". HuffPost. Archived from the original on June 13, 2023. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  69. ^ Mangan, Dan; Breuninger, Kevin (June 9, 2023). "Trump lawyers quit classified documents case". CNBC. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  70. ^ Thrush, Glenn; Nehamas, Nicholas; Sullivan, Eileen (June 13, 2023). "Trump Is Arraigned on Documents and Obstruction Charges". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 13, 2023. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  71. ^ Benen, Steve (May 21, 2024). "Protesters show up at Trump's trial, but not the ones he wanted". MSNBC.com. Retrieved May 25, 2024.
  72. ^ Aleem, Zeeshan (June 13, 2023). "The pro-Trump protests at the Miami arraignment were tiny". MSNBC.com. Retrieved May 25, 2024.
  73. ^ Christopher, Tommy (August 11, 2022). "WATCH: Parade of Cable News Experts Insist FBI Mar-a-Lago Raid Was 'Not a Raid'". Mediaite. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  74. ^ Pagliery, Jose (May 30, 2023). "Trump's Lawyers Start to Wonder if One Could Be a Snitch". The Daily Beast. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  75. ^ Tillman, Zoe (June 23, 2023). "Trump's criminal defense attorney now representing him in federal probes". The Ponca City News. Bloomberg News.
  76. ^ Goudsward, Andrew; Lynch, Sarah N. (June 14, 2023). "Trump's defense team still taking shape as he appears in court". Reuters. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  77. ^ Farhi, Arden (August 10, 2022). "Trump lawyer who was at Mar-a-Lago for FBI search describes the scene". CBS News. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  78. ^ Rumpf, Sarah (August 24, 2022). "Trump's Lawyers Messed Up Their Motion to Represent Him in Florida So Badly the Court Sent Them Instructions". Mediaite.
  79. ^ Swan, Betsy Woodruff; Wu, Nicholas; Cheney, Kyle (September 7, 2022). "All the former president's lawyers (that we know of); The various legal problems have created the need for a lot of legal help". Politico.
  80. ^ Graziosi, Graig (August 16, 2022). "Who are the new faces on Trump's legal team defending him over FBI raid; The various legal problems have created the need for a lot of legal help". The Independent.
  81. ^ Gans, Jared (August 10, 2022). "Trump lawyer says FBI teams focused on three areas at Mar-a-Lago". The Hill.
  82. ^ Palmer, Ewan (July 8, 2023). "Donald Trump's legal team: The lawyers fighting to keep him out of jail". Newsweek.
  83. ^ "Trump attorney Lindsey Halligan: Indictment goes 'for the jugular'". Jesse Watters Primetime. Fox News. June 13, 2023.
  84. ^ a b c Anderson, Curt; Richer, Alanna Durkin (August 10, 2023). "Trump Valet Pleads Not Guilty In Documents Case; Property Manager's Arraignment Postponed". HuffPost. Associated Press. Archived from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  85. ^ Johnson, Carrie (June 14, 2023). "Read the highlights of Trump's arraignment transcript". South Carolina Public Radio. Archived from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  86. ^ Gomez Licon, Adriana; Tucker, Eric (June 27, 2023). "Court Date Postponed for Trump's Valet Walt Nauta in the Classified Documents Case". Associated Press. Archived from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  87. ^ Gomez Licon, Adriana; Tucker, Eric (July 6, 2023). "Trump Valet Charged In Classified Documents Case Set Again For Arraignment". HuffPost. Archived from the original on July 7, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2023.
  88. ^ Beitsch, Rebecca (July 31, 2023). "Trump co-defendant Carlos De Oliveira released on $100K bond". The Hill. Archived from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  89. ^ Sneed, Tierney; Cohen, Marshall; Herb, Jeremy (July 27, 2023). "Special counsel brings more charges against Donald Trump in Mar-a-Lago classified documents case". CNN. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
  90. ^ a b c d e f Thrush, Glenn (June 24, 2023). "Prosecutors Seek to Delay Trump Documents Trial to December". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 24, 2023.
  91. ^ Beitsch, Rebecca (June 19, 2023). "Judge orders Trump not to disclose evidence in documents case". The Hill. Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  92. ^ Beitsch, Rebecca (June 16, 2023). "DOJ seeks protective order to prevent Trump from releasing classified materials amid ongoing investigation". The Hill. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
  93. ^ a b c Feuer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie (July 11, 2023). "Trump Lawyers Seek Indefinite Postponement of Documents Trial". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 15, 2023.
  94. ^ a b Feuer, Alan (July 13, 2023). "Prosecutors Push Back on Trump's Request to Delay Documents Trial". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 15, 2023. Retrieved January 27, 2024.
  95. ^ a b "Government's reply in support of its motion for continuance, Case No. 23-80101-CR-CANNON" (PDF). United States District Court Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Division. July 13, 2023. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 14, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023 – via storage.courtlistener.com.
  96. ^ Greenlee, Will; Holsman, Melissa E.; Montesano, Gianna; Hasert, Eric; Jones, Kaila; Fins, Antonio (July 18, 2023). "Trump pretrial hearing about classified documents in Florida lasts almost 2 hours. Judge to issue ruling 'promptly'". Treasure Coast. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
  97. ^ "Trump lawyers agree to delay pretrial conference in classified documents case". The Hamilton Spectator. July 10, 2023. ISSN 1189-9417. Archived from the original on July 16, 2023. Retrieved July 14, 2023.
  98. ^ Tabick, Brian (July 19, 2023). "Former President Trump, Hannity hold town hall meeting in Cedar Rapids". KCRG. Retrieved September 11, 2023.
  99. ^ Mangan, Dan (August 25, 2023). "Trump valet's lawyer complains of threats after special counsel revealed Mar-a-Lago worker changed story". CNBC. Retrieved October 12, 2023.
  100. ^ Faulders, Katherine; Romero, Laura; Kim, Soo Rin (October 12, 2023). "Judge in classified docs case slams prosecutors before dismissing hearing on potential conflicts of interest". ABC News. Retrieved October 15, 2023.
  101. ^ Sneed, Tierney (August 17, 2023). "Judge in Trump classified docs case cancels tentative August 25 hearing, scheduling sealed proceeding for another time". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 18, 2023.
  102. ^ Polantz, Katelyn (September 13, 2023). "Trump's access to classified information restricted as he heads to trial in documents case, federal judge rules". CNN. Retrieved September 13, 2023.
  103. ^ Lynch, Sarah N.; Thomsen, Jacqueline (August 4, 2023). "Exclusive: Trump documents case judge made multiple errors in earlier trial". Reuters. Retrieved August 4, 2023.
  104. ^ "Video: Legal analyst predicts why Trump went 'ballistic' when Mar-a-Lago maid may be questioned". CNN Politics. November 10, 2023. Retrieved November 10, 2023.
  105. ^ Cannon, Aileen (February 6, 2024). "Order granting in part defendants' motion for temporary leave to file redacted motions, Case No. 23-80101-CR-CANNON" (PDF). storage.courtlistener.com. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  106. ^ Smith, Jack (February 8, 2024). "Government's motion for reconsideration and stay, Case No. 23-80101-CR-CANNON(s)" (PDF). storage.courtlistener.com. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
  107. ^ Goudsward, Andrew (April 9, 2023). "Witnesses in Trump documents case can remain private, judge rules". Reuters. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
  108. ^ Gerstein, Josh; Cheney, Kyle (April 9, 2024). "Siding with special counsel, Cannon agrees to keep witness identities secret". Politico. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
  109. ^ Vlachou, Marita (February 12, 2024). "Donald Trump Attending Closed-Door Hearing In Classified Documents Case". HuffPost. Retrieved February 12, 2024.
  110. ^ Lybrand, Holmes; Rabinowitz, Hannah (February 23, 2024). "Trump seeks to dismiss Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, citing in part presidential immunity". CNN. Retrieved February 23, 2024.
  111. ^ Moran, Lee (March 15, 2024). "Ex-Prosecutor Says New Trump Ruling Is 'Worst Possible Outcome' For Government". HuffPost. Retrieved March 15, 2024.
  112. ^ Tucker, Eric; Richer, Alanna Durkin; Spencer, Terry (March 14, 2024). "Judge Rejects Bid By Trump To Throw Out Classified Documents Case On Constitutional Grounds". HuffPost. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
  113. ^ Legare, Robert (April 4, 2024). "Judge denies Trump's motion to dismiss documents case". CBS News. Retrieved August 20, 2024.
  114. ^ Beitsch, Rebecca (May 7, 2024). "Judge Aileen Cannon suspends key Mar-a-Lago deadline amid feud over evidence handling in Donald Trump classified documents case". The Hill. Retrieved May 7, 2024.
  115. ^ Stein, Perry; Barrett, Devlin (May 7, 2024). "Judge indefinitely delays Trump's classified documents trial in Florida". Washington Post. Retrieved May 8, 2024. As part of her order, Cannon also pushed back a key CIPA-related deadline from May 9 to June 17.
  116. ^ Cannon, Aileen (May 7, 2024). "Order Setting Second Set of Pre-Trial Deadlines/Hearings" (PDF). storage.courtlistener.com. Retrieved May 7, 2024.
  117. ^ Spencer, Terry; Tucker, Eric (May 22, 2024). "Judge in the Florida Trump classified documents case will hear more arguments on dismissing charges". The Associated Press. Retrieved May 22, 2024.
  118. ^ Rabinowitz, Hannah; Sneed, Tierney (May 22, 2024). "Florida hearing in Trump classified documents case devolves into shouting match". CNN. Retrieved May 22, 2024.
  119. ^ Sneed, Tierney (May 22, 2024). "Judge holds first hearing since delaying Trump classified documents trial and criticizing special counsel". CNN. Retrieved May 22, 2024.
  120. ^ Faulders, Katherine; Mallin, Alexander (May 21, 2024). "Special counsel suspected additional obstruction effort by Trump in classified docs case". ABC News. Retrieved May 22, 2024.
  121. ^ Polantz, Katelyn (May 25, 2024). "Special counsel asks judge for gag order in Trump classified documents case". CNN. Retrieved May 25, 2024.
  122. ^ Astor, Maggie (May 22, 2024). "Trump Falsely Claims Biden Administration Was 'Locked & Loaded' to Kill Him". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 23, 2024. Retrieved May 23, 2024. Former President Donald J. Trump misrepresented a standard Justice Department policy to claim the F.B.I. was ready to kill him when searching his home in 2022.
  123. ^ Knowles, Hannah (May 21, 2024). "Trump email falsely says Biden was 'locked & loaded' to 'take me out' in Mar-a-Lago search". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 23, 2024. Retrieved May 23, 2024. A former president falsely accusing his successor and rival of posing a threat to his life is without precedent in modern U.S. history.
  124. ^ Knowles, Hannah (May 22, 2024). "Trump email falsely says Biden was 'locked & loaded' to 'take me out' in Mar-a-Lago search". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved May 22, 2024.
  125. ^ Catoggio, Nick (May 22, 2024). "Murder Porn". The Dispatch.
  126. ^ Vlachou, Marita (May 28, 2024). "Trump's Lawyers Blast Jack Smith's Gag Order Request In Classified Documents Case". HuffPost. Retrieved May 28, 2024.
  127. ^ Durkin Richer, Alanna (May 28, 2024). "Judge Denies Request To Bar Trump Statements That Could Endanger Officers In Classified Docs Case". HuffPost. Retrieved May 28, 2024.
  128. ^ a b Berman, Dan; Polantz, Katelyn (June 5, 2024). "Judge Cannon expands hearing on Trump's request to declare special counsel's appointment invalid". CNN. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
  129. ^ Lybrand, Holmes (June 21, 2024). "Aileen Cannon to entertain Trump's claim the special counsel is unlawful in Friday hearing". CNN. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
  130. ^ Grenoble, Ryan (June 5, 2024). "Judge Cannon Will Allow Third Parties To Argue In Trump's Defense At Hearing". HuffPost. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
  131. ^ Lybrand, Holmes; Perez, Evan (June 21, 2024). "Judge Aileen Cannon pushes Trump's lawyer to defend claim that special counsel is part of a 'shadow government'". CNN. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  132. ^ Lybrand, Holmes; Rabinowitz, Hannah; Polantz, Katelyn (June 24, 2024). "Takeaways from Monday's big hearings in the Trump classified documents case". CNN. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  133. ^ Sneed, Tierney; Lybrand, Holmes (June 25, 2024). "Special counsel defends investigators' handling of Mar-a-Lago documents kept in 'haphazard manner' by Trump". CNN. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  134. ^ Lybrand, Holmes; Polantz, Katelyn; Royal, Denise; Rabinowitz, Hannah (June 25, 2024). "Judge not buying Trump's arguments that Mar-a-Lago search warrant was invalid". CNN. Retrieved June 26, 2024.
  135. ^ Polantz, Katelyn (June 27, 2024). "Judge Aileen Cannon pushes back on idea that more hearings will delay Trump classified documents case". CNN. Retrieved June 27, 2024.
  136. ^ Shelton, Shania (July 5, 2024). "Trump presses Judge Cannon to take up immunity question in Florida classified documents case". CNN. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
  137. ^ Rabinowitz, Hannah (July 6, 2024). "Federal judge pauses some deadlines in Trump's classified documents case after SCOTUS ruling". CNN. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  138. ^ Feuer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie; Savage, Charlie (June 20, 2023). "Judge in Trump Documents Case Sets Tentative Trial Date as Soon as August". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  139. ^ Visser, Nick (July 11, 2023). "Trump Asks For Classified Documents Trial Delay… Possibly Until After 2024 Election". HuffPost. Archived from the original on July 16, 2023. Retrieved July 11, 2023.
  140. ^ Marcus, Ruth (July 13, 2023). "A prosecutor analyzes Trump lawyers' request for indefinite trial delay". Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 13, 2023.
  141. ^ Feinberg, Andrew (July 21, 2023). "Judge sets May 2024 date for Trump classified documents trial". The Independent. Archived from the original on July 21, 2023.
  142. ^ "President Donald J. Trump's reply in further support of motion for adjournment of the trial date" (PDF). United States District Court Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Division. October 11, 2023. Retrieved November 1, 2023 – via storage.courtlistener.com.
  143. ^ Tucker, Eric (November 10, 2023). "A judge declines for now to push back Trump's classified documents trial but postpones other deadlines". Associated Press. Retrieved November 10, 2023.
  144. ^ Derysh, Igor (November 16, 2023). "'Now I'm concerned': Legal experts alarmed over 'Judge Cannon's bias' in new order setting up delay". Yahoo News. Retrieved November 17, 2023.
  145. ^ Sneed, Tierney; Lybrand, Holmes; Royal, Denise; Souza, Sabrina; Rabinowitz, Hannah; Herb, Jeremy; Cohen, Marshall (March 1, 2024). "Classified documents hearing in Florida ends". CNN. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  146. ^ Shabad, Rebecca (March 1, 2024). "Judge to hold critical hearing that could postpone trial in Trump classified documents case". NBC News. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  147. ^ Derysh, Igor (March 1, 2024). "Expert: Trump filing 'one of the most chilling things I've seen' — but Judge Cannon can't ignore it". Salon. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  148. ^ Barrett, Devlin; Stein, Perry (March 21, 2024). "'Very, very troubling': Judges, lawyers flummoxed by Judge Cannon". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved March 21, 2024.
  149. ^ Rabinowitz, Hannah; Sneed, Tierney (April 3, 2024). "Special counsel blasts judge's jury instruction request in Trump documents case". CNN. Retrieved April 3, 2024.
  150. ^ Visser, Nick (April 15, 2024). "Jack Smith Urges Judge: Trump's Delay Tactics In Classified Docs Case 'Must Stop'". HuffPost. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
  151. ^ Biskupic, Joan (July 30, 2024). "Exclusive: The inside story of John Roberts and Trump's immunity win at the Supreme Court". CNN. Retrieved August 6, 2024.
  152. ^ Savage, Charlie (July 15, 2024). "Cannon's Dismissal of Trump Case Rejects Precedents of Higher Courts". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved July 16, 2024.
  153. ^ Johnson, Carrie (July 15, 2024). "Judge dismisses Trump documents case over special counsel appointment". NPR. Retrieved July 17, 2024.
  154. ^ Feuer, Alan (July 15, 2024). "Judge Dismisses Classified Documents Case Against Trump". The New York Times. Retrieved July 16, 2024.
  155. ^ Tucker, Eric; Richer, Alanna Durkin (October 15, 2024). "This Could Have Been A Year Of A Federal Court Reckoning For Trump. Judges Had Other Ideas". HuffPost. Retrieved October 15, 2024. Even as frustrations mounted, department officials never sought Cannon's removal from the case, a low-probability request that likely would have exacerbated relations had it failed. They did not do so even when they told the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in August that her order dismissing the case relied on a "nonsensical" analysis. The appeal is pending before that court, which has the option to reassign the case if it reverses Cannon's ruling.
  156. ^ Feuer, Alan (August 26, 2024). "Prosecutors Appeal Dismissal of Trump Documents Case". The New York Times.
  157. ^ Thompson, Marilyn W. (September 3, 2024). "Judge Cannon Should Be Removed From Trump Case, Watchdog Group Argues in New Legal Filing". ProPublica. Retrieved September 18, 2024.
  158. ^ Faulders, Katherine; Steakin, Will; Santucci, John; Mallin, Alexander (October 22, 2024). "Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general". ABC News. Retrieved October 24, 2024.
  159. ^ Citizens for Ethics (October 23, 2024). "Post". X. Retrieved October 24, 2024. Now that Judge Aileen Cannon is reportedly being considered as a potential attorney general in a second Trump administration, it's even clearer that she can never be impartial in the classified documents case. She must be removed.
  160. ^ Arnsdorf, Isaac; Knowles, Hannah (June 10, 2023). "Trump stares down criminal jeopardy with bluffs and bluster". Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
  161. ^ Yang, Mary (June 10, 2023). "Donald Trump uses his legal woes to plead for money from supporters – again". The Guardian.
  162. ^ Hutzler, Alexandra (June 15, 2023). "Trump makes legal claims about classified documents, experts push back: Fact check". ABC News. Archived from the original on June 16, 2023.
  163. ^ Stange, Niall (June 17, 2023). "The Memo: Trump's legal defenses draw derision — even from some conservatives". The Hill. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023.
  164. ^ Samuels, Brett (June 19, 2023). "Trump defends keeping classified docs in contentious exchange with Fox's Baier". The Hill. Archived from the original on January 27, 2024. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  165. ^ Stein, Sam (June 19, 2023). "Trump: I was too busy to sort through the boxes I took to Mar-a-Lago". Politico. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
  166. ^ Harvey, Josephine (July 17, 2023). "Trump Roasted For Making Up A Law 'Out Of Thin Air' About Classified Documents". HuffPost. Archived from the original on July 17, 2023. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
  167. ^ Ibssa, Lalee; Kim, Soo Rin (September 8, 2023). "Trump says he would take the stand during his trials". ABC News. Retrieved September 18, 2023.
  168. ^ Moye, David (September 14, 2023). "Legal Experts Have A Field Day With Trump's Megyn Kelly Interview". HuffPost. Retrieved September 15, 2023.
  169. ^ Chowdhury, Maureen; Shelton, Shania; Williams, Michael; Sangal, Aditi (October 24, 2024). "Live updates: Harris rallies with Obama in Georgia as Trump campaigns in Arizona". CNN. Retrieved October 24, 2024.
  170. ^ Alfaro, Mariana (June 8, 2023). "Biden says Americans can trust Justice Department as it investigates Trump". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  171. ^ a b c Wong, Scott (June 9, 2023). "Trump allies say Biden is 'weaponizing' DOJ against his chief 2024 rival following indictment". NBC News. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  172. ^ Weiss, Benjamin S. (June 10, 2023). "As Trump faces historic indictment, experts pour cold water on GOP claims of government 'weaponization'". Courthouse News Service. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
  173. ^ Schmidt, Michael S.; Feuer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie; Goldman, Adam (June 10, 2023). "Trump Supporters' Violent Rhetoric in His Defense Disturbs Experts". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
  174. ^ "Romney Statement on Reports of Indictment". Romney.senate.gov (Press release). June 9, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  175. ^ Swearingen, Jake; Teh, Cheryl; Berman, Taylor (June 9, 2023). "'Nobody is above the law': The world reacts to Trump being indicted for the second time". Business Insider. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  176. ^ Sforza, Lauren (June 11, 2023). "Barr: Presenting Trump as victim after indictment is 'ridiculous'". The Hill. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
  177. ^ Evans, Gareth (June 12, 2023). "Donald Trump is 'toast' if indictment correct, William Barr says". BBC News. Archived from the original on June 12, 2023. Retrieved June 12, 2023.
  178. ^ Kapur, Sahil (August 29, 2023). "A shutdown wouldn't halt Trump's trials, so Republicans seek to rein in his prosecutors". NBC News. Retrieved August 20, 2024.
  179. ^ Singh, Kanishka (June 9, 2023). "Top US congressional Democrats urge to let Trump indictment case 'proceed peacefully'". Reuters. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  180. ^ Shear, Michael D.; Epstein, Reid J. (June 9, 2023). "Biden Sticks to 'Say Nothing' Strategy on the Trump Indictment". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 12, 2023. Retrieved June 12, 2023.
  181. ^ Reilly, Ryan J.; Dilanian, Ken (July 30, 2024). "Merrick Garland: It's 'extremely alarming' a shooter was able to get that close to Trump". NBC News. Retrieved July 31, 2024.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Federal_prosecution_of_Donald_Trump_(classified_documents_case)&oldid=1256021564"