Draft talk:Viveen

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Arts

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Rtm-2000 (talk) 10:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC) Because the page you are referring to is owned and run by Viveen Wray. It is her official artist page. www.viveen.info[reply]

@Rtm-2000: precisely, they are owned by the subject, therefore we have no right to use them.

Actually, that's not entirely correct. According to that website, the content is owned by Real Time Media Limited, whose copyright statement clearly forbids use without permission.

Speaking of Real Time Media, I assume that's what the 'Rtm' in your user name refers to? I will post a message on your user talk page about paid editing, please read and respond to it at your earliest opportunity. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:56, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing? FYI - The domain name is owned and belongs to Viveen Wray and the site is run by Real Time Media Limited. RTM is the manager of Viveen. I am correcting and adding in the proof sources. I will be re-writing the text in parts too. I have started this process. It says 12 weeks until it becomes live. So there is time. Rtm-2000 (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

On this page somebody has deemed Imdb an unreliable source. Its a major industry source of credits for TV, Film and Video - I see other pages quoting that source. Why is it deemed inappropriate for this page? The same goes for Discogs and Musicbrainz?

Also a citation is required for dob. Who has ever had their dob openly published in the public domain other than on Wiki? Rtm-2000 (talk) 02:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rtm-2000: see WP:IMDB and WP:DISCOGS. User-generated content is not considered reliable. That includes MusicBrainz, although it hasn't been proscribed quite to the extent those other two have.

As for DOB, supporting that with a reliable published source is a hard requirement, per WP:DOB. If someone hasn't had their DOB "openly published in the public domain", then that is precisely the reason why we shouldn't publish it, either. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:42, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]