Draft talk:Shore Capital Partners

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles

Companies

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Private Equity

This page is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the private equity and venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This project seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects:

Private EquityWikipedia:WikiProject Private EquityTemplate:WikiProject Private EquityPrivate Equity articles

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

JMShore (talk · contribs) has been paid by Shore Capital Partners. See User:JMShore for disclosure statement

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Kiersten1021 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Shore Capital Partners. See disclosure

Notability

@Trailblazer101 and Timtrent: I did think of moving this back to draft myself, but have previously been challenged that WP:DRAFTOBJECT meant that if something started life as a draft, and was moved to mainspace it should not be draftified. That's not my interpretation, but hey.

That move seemed more than a little 'ducky' to me.

Do either of you have access to the WSJ articles? Almost all the sources are paywalled, so I couldn't say definitively how much independent, secondary coverage there was and whether or not it was enough to meet WP:NCORP. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer Regrettably I have no access 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Curb Safe Charmer Shore Capital Partners existed. now is a redirect. Odd history 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I do not have access to the WSJ. Just from a quick glance at this draft, it still reads a lot like promotional material and trivial facts with not much independent coverage. As for the history, this draft was rejected at AfC multiple times and was unilaterally moved by an uninvolved new editor. I reverted that move as it bypassed the AfC process and did not address the concerns raised there, because it should not have been moved in the first place. I left a mainspace redirect behind to point it to a related subject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been able to access three out of the four WSJ articles via ProQuest:

These are all entirely based on what a spokesman for the company said, with no analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]