This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
Onel5969, pinging you to confirm that you meant to mark this article as reviewed. It's been moved back and forth to various titles (some more appropriate, others less) by its initial editor and I wanted to double check whether you intended to review the article or the redirect. signed, Rosguilltalk19:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, no, I did not mean for it to be marked reviewed at this point. It is difficult for me to judge the reliability or lack thereof of Indian news sources, so I rely on WP:RSP and WP:NPPRS. It does have two articles from reliable sources, The Print and Indian Express. Initially, I confused the New Indian Express with the latter, so might have checked it reviewed, and then forgot to go back and uncheck it, since that is not a reliable source. I tend to go with the need for at least three legitimate sources. I've changed it back to unreviewed, and if no one else gets to it in the next week or so, I'll revisit and see if it's been improved. Thanks for the heads up. Onel5969TT me19:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]