Draft talk:Joy Chatterjee

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

India

This page is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia

Biography

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Not quite sure how to approach this

We're severely lacking English sources for text that isn't taken directly from his Linkedin page. Not sure how to move forward unless other sources are found, otherwise we end up taking out about 90% of the article. jellyfish ✉ 15:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Linkedin.com is absolutely NOT a reliable independent source and cannot be used for anything. Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That I'm aware of and 100% agree with - my main concern here is if it would somehow be a copyvio. Should the content just be axed entirely from the draft? Was there when I draftified it, sadly. Jellyfish (mobile) (talk) 16:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would say yes it should be removed. Theroadislong (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me. Didn't want to basically gut the whole thing if I couldn't replace it with something, but until something reliable is found, better to get rid of the promotional nonsense than leave it. Jellyfish (mobile) (talk) 16:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]