Draft talk:Autism cure movement

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Controversies in autism#Pro-cure perspective]] The anchor (#Pro-cure perspective) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Dubious

"pro-cure advocates believe that autism is a disorder caused by genetic defects"

This leaves out the the pro-cure advocates who believe that autism is caused by vaccinations, mercury or other environmental factors.

"that all autistic people would be better off if they were not autistic"

I've seen pro-cure arguments that say that a cure would good because it would benefit people without autism. Also those who wish to cure only "low-functioning" autists; if you count those as pro-cure. Clr324 (talk) 17:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All valid concerns. I've added "or environmental harm" and removed "all" from "all autistic people". Tell me if you think this change is sufficient. Muffinator (talk) 18:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are functioning labels a significant topic to cover in the article? Muffinator (talk) 18:05, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Functioning labels are largely irrelevant at least in the context of this Wikipedia article. I just used it as an example in order to show that generalizations aren't always good. I'm sorry, I just dislike some generalizations. Clr324 (talk) 21:07, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]