Draft:Swat.wiki
| Submission declined on 18 October 2024 by Ktkvtsh (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 18 October 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 26 days ago. | |
Type of site | Pastebin |
|---|---|
| Available in | English |
| Founder(s) | Peer, Dave |
| Commercial | No |
| Registration | Optional |
| Users | 30,000+ |
| Current status | Active |
| Written in | NextJS |
Swat Wiki is a pastebin-style platform used primarily for sharing and leaking personal information (often referred to as doxing) of individuals.
Operators
[edit]The operators behind Swat Wiki remain anonymous, promoting a platform where users can upload and access doxed information. In 2024, the platform's administrators stated that it was created as a space for those who seek to publish and view personal details of individuals without censorship. Despite the controversial nature, they maintain that swat.wiki is simply a tool and does not actively promote harassment.
Legality
[edit]Swat Wiki's terms of service claim that the platform does not allow the posting of illegal content such as threats of physical violence, child-related information, or explicit content involving minors. However, the platform openly hosts and shares personal information of individuals without consent, which raises significant legal and ethical concerns.
According to the privacy policy, Swat Wiki asserts compliance with Section 230 of the United States Communications Decency Act, claiming legal immunity as a host for user-generated content. The platform states that it does not verify the legality of posted material, placing responsibility on the users.
Swat Wiki Community
[edit]Swat Wiki has attracted a community interested in accessing and sharing sensitive information. The platform has become a hub for doxing activities, where users can exchange information and discuss methods for gathering and publishing personal data. The moderators of swat.wiki take a hands-off approach, allowing users to post freely within the platform’s loose guidelines.
Criticism and Controversy
[edit]Swat Wiki has faced criticism for its role in facilitating harassment and privacy violations. Critics argue that the platform's hands-off approach encourages malicious behavior, while legal experts highlight the potential legal liabilities despite its claim of immunity under Section 230. Advocacy groups have called for stricter regulation and monitoring of such platforms to prevent abuse and protect individuals' privacy.
References
[edit]Category:Internet privacy Category:Cyberstalking Category:Controversial websites