Draft:Srikant Dwivedi
| Submission rejected on 10 November 2024 by CoconutOctopus (talk). This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by CoconutOctopus 11 days ago. Last edited by CommonsDelinker 2 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 10 November 2024 by CoconutOctopus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by CoconutOctopus 11 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 10 November 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 11 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 November 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Bonadea 13 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 November 2024 by CoconutOctopus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by CoconutOctopus 19 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 November 2024 by Jannatulbaqi (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Jannatulbaqi 19 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 2 November 2024 by Hoary (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Hoary 19 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 November 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 19 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 2 November 2024 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by HitroMilanese 19 days ago. | |
Comment: It is clear that this draft is not going to get to a stage for publishing any time soon if at all. I urge you to consider other tasks before trying to write another draft as it is clear you do not understand Wikipedia's referencing guidelines. CoconutOctopus talk 19:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: "Early life" and "Education" are completely unreferenced. Other material too is unreferenced.
- Comment: Please do not resubmit this draft without serious improvement to the sourcing or it is likely to be rejected and you will be unable to submit again. CoconutOctopus talk 15:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The Times of India is not a reliable source. Theroadislong (talk) 15:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The source "The Great Pageant Company" is clearly not an independent or reliable source, per the info at https://thegreatpageantcommunity.com/about/ .iwmbuzz and tellyupdates are generally unreliable, see the helpful list of Indian movie sources here. bonadea contributions talk 16:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Facebook is not a reliable source. CoconutOctopus talk 15:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: "popularity of Srikant has increased, and people started knowing him and giving him a lot of love. Apart from this, Srikant Dwivedi is quite popular for his height, 6 feet 4 inches" is un-encyclopaedic garbarge. Theroadislong (talk) 14:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: www.filmyques.in is not a reliable source it appears to be user edited. Theroadislong (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The TImes of India is not a reliablesource. Theroadislong (talk) 10:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Large portion of this submission is unsourced. IMDb is not a reliable source. Please see WP:RS and sources accordingly. Hitro talk 08:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Srikant Dwivedi | |
|---|---|
| Born | May 20, 1991 Uttar Pradesh, India |
| Occupation(s) | Actor, Model |
| Known for | Shiv Shakti – Tap Tyaag Tandav Lakshmi Narayan – Sukh Samarthya Santulan |
| Title | Mister Global India (2017) |
Srikant Dwivedi (born 20 May 1991) is an Indian actor who primarily works in Hindi television. Srikant is widely known for his portrayal of Lord Narayan in Shiv Shakti – Tap Tyaag Tandav[1]and Lakshmi Narayan – Sukh Samarthya Santulan[2]
Filmography
[edit]Television
[edit]| Year | Title | Role | Notes | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Hara Sindoor | Supporting Role | [3] | |
| 2022-2023 | Naagin Season 6 | Anant Nag | [3] | |
| 2023 | Bhagya Lakshmi | Vinky | Cameo Role | [3] |
| 2023 | Shiv Shakti - Tap Tyaag Tandav | Lord Narayan | Recurring | [1] |
| 2024 | Lakshmi Narayan - Sukh Samarthya Santulan | Lord Narayan | Lead Role | [2] |
Movies
[edit]| Year | Title | Role | Notes | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | War | Derrick | [4] | |
| 2023 | Vash | Rocky | [5] | |
| 2024 | Dog | Young Virendra | [5] |
References
[edit]- ^ a b "Srikant Dwivedi on doing photoshoots and playing the role of Lord Vishnu". The Times of India. 13 December 2024. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
- ^ a b "Colors announces Laxmi Narayan; mythological show to go on air from April 22". Bollywood Hungama. 17 April 2024. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
- ^ a b c "After Hara Sindoor Srikant Dwivedi joins the cast of Naagin 6 and BhagyaLakshmi". The Times of India. 10 February 2023. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
- ^ "Srikant Dwivedi in War". Bollywood Hungama. 2 October 2019. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
- ^ a b "Filmography". Bollywood Hungama. 1 January 1970. Retrieved 31 October 2024.