Jump to content

Draft:Self-accreditation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Self-Accreditation Self-accreditation is a process by which training providers create evidence or proof of learning content without involving third-party organizations. This method is particularly popular in contexts where no external regulator or authority is mandated to provide quality control of learning content. Self-accreditation allows training providers to demonstrate their high standards by publishing the aims of the learning event, the skills transferred, and the outcomes achieved.

Overview Self-accreditation involves providing evidence of a training or learning event by combining the training content aims, skills, and outcomes with the training provider's details into a single verifiable and auditable document. This process can be applied to various types of learning content, including micro-learning and training courses that do not fall under the remit of a regulator .

Forms of Evidence Evidence of self-accreditation can take various forms, such as certificates and digital badges provided they contain information necessary for evaluation of learning content and verification of the identity of the training provider. The authenticity of these credentials is tied to the provider, who effectively endorses the quality standards without the involvement of an external body . Large corporations have utilized self-accreditation for many years, with examples including Microsoft Certified Training .

Advantages of Self-Accreditation Self-accreditation offers several advantages:

Flexibility: Providers can quickly adapt their content and accreditation processes to meet market demands without waiting for external approval . Cost-effectiveness: Eliminating third-party involvement reduces costs associated with accreditation . Control: Training providers maintain complete control over the content and standards of their courses . Limitations

Despite its advantages, self-accreditation also presents some limitations:

Perceived Bias: Since providers self-endorse their standards, there may be concerns about the objectivity and rigor of the accreditation . Lack of Recognition: Self-accredited courses might not be as widely recognized as those accredited by established third-party organizations .

Examples in Practice Self-accreditation is widely used by both large and small training providers. For instance, Microsoft offers certified training programs that follow self-accreditation principles . The size or popularity of the provider does not impact the process, as the evidence of quality lies in the published aims, skills, and outcomes.

References

[edit]

[1] [2]