Draft:Midstream Lighting
| Submission declined on 7 June 2024 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 4 April 2024 by Mcmatter (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Mcmatter 7 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 3 April 2024 by Geardona (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Geardona 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 5 December 2023 by Greenman (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Greenman 11 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 30 November 2023 by UtherSRG (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by UtherSRG 11 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 17 May 2023 by RPSkokie (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by RPSkokie 18 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 3 August 2022 by Gusfriend (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Gusfriend 2 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 15 March 2022 by Behind the moors (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Behind the moors 2 years ago. | |
Comment: Press releases are not independent and should not be used to cite anything except straight facts that could not be controversial. They do not count as a valid source towards notability and we need to see something from reliable sources that have written about the company on their own accord. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 |
| Industry | Lighting |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1 January 2010 |
| Founders | Yuli Grig, Alexander Krupkin and Paolo Corno |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom |
Area served | Worldwide |
| Products | |
| Website | www |
Midstream Lighting Ltd[1] is a global manufacturing company that produces advanced LED high-power lighting solutions for multiple sectors[2] (including the aviation[3], sports, maritime, and military industries).
Notable Projects
[edit]Gatwick Airport
London Gatwick Airport used Midstream Lighting to upgrade their airside lighting systems because many of the existing lights were not meeting EASA legislation. The airport also wanted to reduce the energy consumption of their airside lighting areas by 20% (compared to their 1990s levels). Midstream installed over 560 LED floodlights, making Gatwick the first airport to have a fully LED-lit and EASA-compliant apron.[4]
Glasgow Airport
Midstream Lighting worked on a project at Glasgow airport to replace existing sodium projector lights. 236 sodium projectors were replaced with just 164 LED floodlights[5], reducing the energy consumption of the lighting system by 61% and making Glasgow Airport the first international airport to ‘completely switch to LED for stand lighting’.[6]
Stoke City's Bet 365 Stadium
Midstream Lighting was involved in the floodlighting upgrade of the stadium in 2023. With the floodlighting upgrade, the stadium also has the ability to put on light shows – which is now a standard occurrence at every evening game[7] – it produces a stunning pre-match display that brings the bet365 to life in a whole new way. [8]
References
[edit]- ^ "MIDSTREAM LIGHTING LIMITED overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK". find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk.
- ^ "Midstream Lighting". Made in Britain.
- ^ [1] Midstream Lighting Ltd is a global manufacturing company that produces advanced LED high power professional lighting solutions in Aviation
- ^ "Net Zero Emissions | Sustainability | Gatwick Airport". www.gatwickairport.com.
- ^ "LED light switch ensures Glasgow Airport's airfield even more energy efficient | Glasgow Airport". www.glasgowairport.com.
- ^ "Midstream Lighting - Lighting the way to the future - Future Airport". www.futureairport.com.
- ^ "Latest Stoke City investment to bring industry-leading light shows to bet365 Stadium - Daily Focus". 24 October 2023.
- ^ Smith, Peter (24 October 2023). "Stoke to launch 'extraordinary state of the art' light show before Leeds clash". Stoke on Trent Live.
Categories:
- AfC G13 eligible soon submissions
- AfC submissions by date/03 June 2024
- AfC submissions by date/04 April 2024
- AfC submissions by date/03 April 2024
- AfC submissions by date/04 December 2023
- AfC submissions by date/30 November 2023
- AfC submissions by date/17 May 2023
- AfC submissions by date/02 August 2022
- AfC submissions by date/15 March 2022
- Draft articles on business and economics
- Draft articles on STEM
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.