Draft:Influence of Geography on Economic History
Submission declined on 4 October 2024 by I dream of horses (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
- Comment: Wikipedia is not a repository for secondary school/college essays. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 15:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Geography has played a crucial role in shaping economic history by influencing trade routes, resource distribution, and settlement patterns. The relationship between geography and economics is multifaceted, encompassing various geographical features such as mountains, rivers, and climate, which directly affect economic activities.
- Geographical Features and Trade
- Rivers and Waterways**: Historically, rivers have served as vital trade routes. For example, the Mississippi River in the United States facilitated trade among Native Americans and European settlers due to its accessibility from the northern regions to the Gulf of Mexico. Similarly, the Great Lakes provided a quicker means of transport compared to overland routes, enhancing trade efficiency in North America[1]. Waterways not only allowed for the movement of goods but also connected different regions economically.
- Mountains and Deserts**: Conversely, geographical barriers like mountains and deserts have often impeded trade. Traders historically sought passes through mountains or relied on oases in deserts to facilitate commerce. The Khyber Pass, for instance, was a critical link between Southern and Central Asia, enabling trade despite challenging terrain[1]. The ability to navigate these barriers has significantly influenced economic interactions between communities.
- Climate and Economic Development
Climate also plays a significant role in economic history. Regions with favorable climates tend to have higher agricultural productivity, which can lead to economic prosperity. For instance, temperate zones with access to oceans often exhibit higher GDP per capita compared to landlocked countries. This is largely due to better access to trade routes and resources[2][5]. Countries surrounded by oceans benefit from maritime trade opportunities and access to marine resources, which can bolster their economies.
- Historical Context
The influence of geography on economic development can be traced back to early human migrations. As populations grew in Northern Africa, communities migrated into Europe and Asia in search of more fertile land. These migrations were heavily influenced by geographical features that either facilitated or hindered movement[1]. Over time, the establishment of trade routes and settlements was often dictated by the geographical landscape.
In summary, geography has profoundly influenced economic history through its impact on trade routes, resource distribution, and settlement patterns. Understanding this relationship helps explain why certain regions have thrived economically while others have struggled. The interplay between geographical features and human activity continues to shape economies around the world today.
Citations: [1] https://study.com/academy/lesson/how-geographical-features-impact-economic-activity.html [2] https://www.bb.org.bd/pub/research/workingpaper/wp1615.pdf [3] https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199874002/obo-9780199874002-0146.xml [4] https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001799761012334 [5] https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/publications/faculty-working-papers/geography-and-economic-development [6] https://shs.cairn.info/revue-recherches-economiques-de-louvain-2011-2-page-141?lang=fr [7] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233996238_Geography_and_Economic_Development [8] https://www.jstor.org/stable/857
References
[edit]https://www.jstor.org/stable/857 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233996238_Geography_and_Economic_Development https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199874002/obo-9780199874002-0004.xml https://www.bb.org.bd/pub/research/workingpaper/wp1615.pdf https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001799761012334 https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cid/publications/faculty-working-papers/geography-and-economic-development https://shs.cairn.info/revue-recherches-economiques-de-louvain-2011-2-page-141?lang=fr