Draft:Google Search Algorithm Leak (May 2024)

Submission declined on 9 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by SafariScribe 4 months ago. Last edited by SafariScribe 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

In May 2024, a significant leak of internal Google documents occurred, providing unprecedented insight into the search engine's ranking factors and algorithmic processes. The leak, consisting of over 2,500 pages of documentation, was first disclosed by Erfan Azimi, CEO of EA Eagle Digital, and subsequently shared with Rand Fishkin, founder of SparkToro.

Contents of the Leak

The leaked documents include comprehensive details on over 14,000 API attributes and modules related to Google’s search engine. Key revelations from the documents include:

Click Data and User Signals

Contrary to Google's public statements, the documents reveal that user clicks and other click-related metrics significantly influence search rankings. The NavBoost system, in place since 2005, employs click data to adjust rankings, contradicting Google's previous denials about the impact of clicks on search results.

Site Authority

The documents mention a "siteAuthority" score, indicating that Google does measure site-wide authority. This contradicts Google’s earlier claims that it does not use a site authority score in its ranking algorithm (Enterprise Technology News and Analysis).

Authorship and Content Quality

Google tracks author information and uses it to assess content quality. The freshness of content, relevance to the core topic of a website, and alignment between page titles and content are all significant ranking factors. Additionally, Google evaluates the average weighted font size of terms within documents.

Chrome Data

Data from Google Chrome, identified by the "ChromeInTotal" module, is used as a quality signal. This indicates that the pages viewed through Chrome play a role in determining their quality and ranking in search results.

Miscellaneous Factors

Other notable factors revealed include the importance of link diversity, content originality, and various algorithmic demotions such as anchor mismatch, search engine results page (SERP) dissatisfaction, and exact match domains.

Implications and Reactions

The leak has significant implications for SEO practices, exposing previously undisclosed ranking factors and contradicting many of Google's public statements. SEO experts and digital marketers are re-evaluating strategies based on the newfound information. Google has responded by cautioning against making assumptions based on the leaked documents, suggesting that they may lack context or be outdated

This leak, being one of the most substantial in the history of Google's search division, highlights the ongoing tension between transparency and the proprietary nature of search engine operations.

References

Is Google S.E.O. Gaslighting the Internet? at New Yorker
Google Algorithm Leak Contradicts What Google Has Said About Website Rankings at CNET
Google admits massive document leak related to search algorithm is authentic at New York Post
Google Accidentally Publishes Search Algorithm Documents at Business Insider
Is Google S.E.O. Gaslighting the Internet? at New Yorker
Google Leak Spills the Secret Sauce for Search Rankings — Here's What to Know at Entrepreneur
Internal document leak sheds light on how Google Search works at The National Desk
Google seemingly leaked a treasure trove of technical search algorithm details at Yahoo