Draft:Edmund Vincent Cowdry
Submission declined on 6 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Edmund Vincent (E.V.) Cowdry (1888-1975) was a Canadian cytologist and gerontologist. His works includ General Cytology[1], A Textbook of Histology[2], Problems of Ageing[3], and numerous other publications. His biography may be found in the Washington University School of Medicine Bernard Becker Library collection[4][5].
References
[edit]- ^ Cowdry, E. V. (1924). General cytology; a textbook of cellular structure and function for students of biology and medicine. Chicago, Ill.: The University of Chicago Press.
- ^ Cowdry, E. V.; Finerty, Edmund V. Cowdry John C. (1938). A textbook of histology: functional significance of cells and intercellular substances (2d ed., thoroughly rev. ... ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger. OL 6371123M.
- ^ Cowdry, E. V. (Edmund Vincent) (1979). Problems of ageing. Internet Archive. New York : Arno Press. ISBN 978-0-405-11813-5.
- ^ "Biography: E.V. Cowdry". beckerexhibits.wustl.edu. Retrieved 2024-07-06.
- ^ "A Canadian in the Palaces of the Oil Prince". beckerexhibits.wustl.edu. Retrieved 2024-07-06.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.