Draft:CaptionHub
| Submission rejected on 10 June 2024 by Ingenuity (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Ingenuity 5 months ago. Last edited by Ingenuity 5 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 23 May 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).DoubleGrazing 5 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 23 May 2024 by Ingenuity (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Ingenuity 5 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 16 April 2024 by Primefac (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Primefac 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 February 2024 by Usedtobecool (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Usedtobecool 9 months ago.
| |
Comment: There has been no improvement since this was last declined, and I do not see any evidence that the subject is notable. I am now rejecting this draft. —Ingenuity (t • c) 02:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The submission was declined based on sources, several of the sources included are mainstream objective 3rd party news articles + over 8 more sources than equivalent software submissions that have been approved. For example, Broadcast is one of the sources and is one of the top monthly magazines for the United Kingdom television and radio industry, owned by Media Business Insight. And there are two articles from MultiLingual which has been the leading source of language industry information since 1987 with 50,000 readers in over 100 countries. So to say there are no objective news sources with reach is inaccurate. At this point I feel like this submission is being much more harshly critiqued compared to others based on previous reviewers, and critiqued without proper insight into the quality of the sources within the industry this software falls within (localisation and live broadcast) and I don't think that is a fair process and review and I hope the next reviewer will take a more careful look.
- Comment: Not one – repeat, not one! – of the sources counts towards notability per WP:NCORP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The content is better than it was before, but there's still a major problem: as far as I can see, not a single one of the references is of sufficient quality to establish notability. For the subject to be notable, there needs to be multiple references to reliable sources that are both independent of the subject and having significant coverage. —Ingenuity (t • c) 03:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: (note that this comment is addressed mainly to the page creator/company owners) First, if you're going to pay someone to write a Wikipedia entry for you... don't. It's a scam. Second, while the editor you hired did improve your draft, it still does not meet our inclusion requirements and is still full of jargon ("slippy timeline"??) and an overly-promotional tone. We don't need the intricate details of how the product works (that's what an {{official website}} link is for), so keep it simple. Most importantly, though, please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail. Primefac (talk) 06:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 | This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (May 2024) |
 | |
| Industry | Translation & Localization |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 |
| Founder | Tom Bridges |
| Headquarters | United Kingdom |
Key people | Tom Bridges (Founder, CEO) James Jameson (CCO) |
| Website | official website |
CaptionHub is a British company based in London, United Kingdom that provides an AI-powered multimedia subtitling platform offering transcription, translation and, synthetic voiceover in over 190 languages.[1] The platform also offers multilingual subtitling for live streams and automation technology.[2][3][4]
History
[edit]CaptionHub was founded in 2015 by Tom Bridges.[1] The company developed an enterprise localization platform partnering with technologies like AWS, Phrase, and LILT for speech recognition, machine translation, and for integration with translation management systems.[5][6][7] In 2021, TED chose the platform to subtitle 200,000+ TED, TEDx, and TED-Ed talks into 115 languages by its 39,000 translators.[8][9]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Armitage, Tom. "CaptionHub Building the world's most advanced subtitling platform". Armitage. Retrieved 2024-04-08.
- ^ Bickerton, Jake (2023-11-30). "CaptionHub launches AI-enabled real-time subtitling app". Broadcast Now. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
- ^ Ring, Brian L (2024-04-19). "NAB 2024: The Bold Innovations You Probably Missed at the Show". Sports Video Group. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
- ^ Buchlovsky, Radek (May 23, 2024). "Fully Automated Multimedia Localization Possible?". Multilingual. Retrieved May 23, 2024.
- ^ "Subtitling videos accurately and easily with CaptionHub and AWS | AWS Machine Learning Blog". aws.amazon.com. 2019-11-19. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
- ^ "CaptionHub and Memsource sign strategic alliance for multimedia localization". MultiLingual. 2022-07-13. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
- ^ Lilt. "LILT and CaptionHub Partner to Support AI-powered Multilingual Videos". Newswire (Press release). Retrieved 2024-05-23.
- ^ "Translating TED: Get Started". TED. 23 May 2024. Retrieved 2024-05-22.
- ^ "TED Selects CaptionHub as Their Global Subtitling Platform". Slator. 2021-07-14. Retrieved 2024-05-23.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.