Draft:Augmentative Interspecies Communication (AIC)
Submission declined on 30 December 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Augmentative Interspecies Communication (AIC)
[edit]Augmentative Interspecies Communication (AIC) refers to methods of communication between humans and animals that utilize devices enabling animals to convey messages to humans. These devices, similar to Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) tools used by humans with speech impairments, include interfaces like lexigrams, magnetic chips, keyboards, and soundboards.
Overview
[edit]The field of AIC aims to bridge the communication gap between humans and animals by employing technological tools. These tools allow animals to express needs, desires, and other messages through the activation of buttons or symbols. AIC methods have been particularly popularized by the use of soundboards with dogs, where each button corresponds to a specific word or phrase. For example, buttons might represent concepts like "outside," "treat," or "play."
Research Findings
[edit]Research suggests that dogs may be capable of more complex communication through soundboards. For example, dogs have been observed to press combinations of buttons such as "outside" + "bathroom" or "food" + "water," indicating intentional and purposeful communication.
To rule out the possibility of random button presses, researchers employed computer modeling. Results demonstrated that the sequences of button presses followed specific patterns distinct from random behavior, confirming the likelihood of conscious communication.
Notably, the behavior of dogs using these devices showed independence rather than mimicry of their owners. For instance, while the "I love you" button was frequently used by humans interacting with the soundboard, dogs pressed it significantly less often, suggesting autonomous decision-making in their communication.[1]
This demonstrates that dogs are, at the very least, capable of learning an association between these words or buttons and their outcomes in the world.[2]
Devices and Usage
[edit]The primary devices used in AIC include:
- Soundboards: Panels with programmable buttons that produce pre-recorded words or phrases when pressed.
- Lexigrams: Visual symbols representing words or concepts.
- Keyboards and Magnetic Chips: Tools that allow animals to select or manipulate items to convey messages.
The most commonly used buttons for dogs are related to basic needs and activities, such as:
- "Outside"
- "Treat"
- "Play"
- "Bathroom"
Criticism
[edit]Despite the promising results, several concerns have been raised in the field:
- Linguistic Claims: Critics argue that animals using AIC devices may not demonstrate true linguistic skills. Instead, simpler mechanisms like associative learning could explain their behavior.
- Ecological Relevance: Some researchers suggest that the interfaces of AIC devices are not sufficiently aligned with the natural ways animals communicate, potentially limiting their effectiveness.
- Methodological Issues: Data from AIC experiments may be considered unreliable due to potential experimenter cueing and inconsistent reporting of training and performance.[3]
References
[edit]- ^ Bastos, Amalia P. M.; Houghton, Zachary N.; Naranjo, Lucas; Rossano, Federico (2024-12-09). "Soundboard-trained dogs produce non-accidental, non-random and non-imitative two-button combinations". Scientific Reports. 14 (1): 28771. Bibcode:2024NatSR..1428771B. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-79517-6. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 11628621. PMID 39653730.
- ^ Bastos, Amalia P. M.; Evenson, Ashley; Wood, Patrick M.; Houghton, Zachary N.; Naranjo, Lucas; Smith, Gabriella E.; Cairo-Evans, Alexandria; Korpos, Lisa; Terwilliger, Jack; Raghunath, Sarita; Paul, Cassandra; Hou, Hairou; Rossano, Federico (2024-08-28). Cooper, Brenton G. (ed.). "How do soundboard-trained dogs respond to human button presses? An investigation into word comprehension". PLOS ONE. 19 (8): e0307189. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307189. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 11355551. PMID 39196871.
- ^ Smith, Gabriella E.; Bastos, Amalia P. M.; Evenson, Ashley; Trottier, Leo; Rossano, Federico (2023). "Use of Augmentative Interspecies Communication devices in animal language studies: A review". WIREs Cognitive Science. 14 (4): e1647. doi:10.1002/wcs.1647. ISSN 1939-5086. PMID 36998200.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.