This category is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Were they wives? When the Ottoman sultan married Roxelana in the 16th-century, this was such an unusual act as to create general disturbance and consternation among the public: [1] It seem as though the Ottoman sultans did not in fact marry after the 15th-century, but took concubines, though concubinage was regarded as respectable and the children was not regarded as illegitimate, which makes a misunderstanding of the term understandable. Most of the women included in this category was therefore not wives, but concubines. Most of them must therefore be removed from the category. --Aciram (talk) 13:32, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Answer: with the exception of Roxelana and a handful others, the "wives" of the Ottoman sultans were in fact not their wives: it was the custom of the sultans to procreate with slave concubines instead. This category and its sub-categories are therefore incorrect. They sould be renamed. I suggest "consorts"; that can include both the few actual wives as well as the hundreds of slave concubine-consorts which are now in these categories. --Aciram (talk) 21:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
