Category talk:Codes of conduct

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Too broad

This category is too broad in its inclusion. I deleted a few non-codes of conduct such as five solas and affluenza, but there are a ton more that should be excised. I can help with this via AWB, but I didn't want to do it unilaterally since it is such a large change. What sayest ye? What sort of thing belongs here and what doesn't? --Flex (talk/contribs) 14:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: too broad

This category is too broad in its inclusion. I deleted a few non-codes of conduct such as five solas and affluenza, but there are a ton more that should be excised (e.g., Higher Power, Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy, Social Gospel, Disciple (Christianity), etc. etc.). I can help with this via AWB, but I didn't want to do it unilaterally since it is such a large change. What sayest ye? What sort of thing belongs here and what doesn't? Gray areas would include entries such as Norm (philosophy), Pledge of Allegiance, Blue Laws, etc. --Flex (talk/contribs) 13:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold. I might get rid of Humanitarian crisis, Jesus movement, City upon a hill, Ponzi scheme, USA PATRIOT Act, Dianetics, Eternal sin and Uniform Vehicle Code, too. None of these discuss codes of conduct.Phyesalis (talk) 05:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could remove WWJD because it is essentially the same as some others. Fleetflame (talk) 02:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

Rename to Category:Codes of conduct per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)? Cander0000 (talk) 09:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]