Appeal to accomplishment

Appeal to accomplishment is a logical fallacy wherein Person A challenges a thesis put forward by Person B because Person B has not accomplished similar feats (or as many feats) as Person C or Person A.^[1]

The reverse, appealing to the fact that no one has the proper experience in question and thus cannot prove something is impossible, is a version of an argument from silence.

Appeal to accomplishment is a form of appeal to authority, which is a well-known logical fallacy. Some consider that it can be used in a cogent form when all sides of a discussion agree on the reliability of the authority in the given context.^[2]^[3]

Examples

"How dare you criticize the prime minister? What do you know about running an entire country?"
"I'll take your opinions on music seriously when you've released a record that went platinum."
"Get back to me when you've built up a multi-billion dollar empire of your own. Until then, shut up."
"If you think you know so much about making a video game, make one yourself!"
"If you think you know so much about making a Street Mod car, make one yourself!"

References

^ Bennett, Bo. "Appeal to Accomplishment". Logically Fallacious.
^ Lewiński, Marcin (2008). "Comments on 'Black box arguments'". Argumentation. 22 (3): 447–451. doi:10.1007/s10503-008-9095-x.
^ Emermen, Frans (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. p. 203. ISBN 978-9027211194.

[1] Bennett, Bo. "Appeal to Accomplishment". Logically Fallacious.

[Alpha-2] Lewiński, Marcin (2008). "Comments on 'Black box arguments'". Argumentation. 22 (3): 447–451. doi:10.1007/s10503-008-9095-x.

[Beta-3] Emermen, Frans (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. p. 203. ISBN 978-9027211194.

[1]

[2]

[3]