Jump to content

Williams diagram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In combustion, Williams diagram refers to a classification diagram of different turbulent combustion regimes in a plane, having turbulent Reynolds number as the x-axis and turbulent Damköhler number as the y-axis.[1] The diagram is named after Forman A. Williams (1985).[2] The definition of the two non-dimensionaless numbers are[3]

where is the rms turbulent velocity flucturation, is the integral length scale, is the kinematic viscosity and is the chemical time scale. The Reynolds number based on the Taylor microscale becomes . The Damköhler number based on the Kolmogorov time scale is given by . The Karlovitz number is defined by .

The Williams diagram is universal in the sense that it is applicable to both premixed and non-premixed combustion. In supersonic combustion and detonations, the diagram becomes three-dimensional due to the addition of the Mach number as the z-axis, where is the sound speed.[4]

Borghi–Peters diagram

[edit]

In premixed combustion, an alternate diagram, known as the Borghi–Peters diagram, is also used to describe different regimes. This diagram is named after Roland Borghi (1985) and Norbert Peters (1986).[5][6] The Borghi–Peters diagram uses as the x-axis and as the y-axis, where and are the thickness and speed of the planar, laminar premixed flame. Since , where is the Prandtl number (set ), and in premixed flames, we have

The limitations of the Borghi–Peters diagram are that (1) it cannot be used for non-premixed combustion and (2) it is not suitable for practically relevant cases where both and are increased concurrently, such as increasing nozzle radius while maintaining constant nozzle exit velocity.[7]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Williams, F. A. (2000). Progress in knowledge of flamelet structure and extinction. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 26(4-6), 657-682.
  2. ^ Williams, F. A. (1985). Turbulent combustion. In The mathematics of combustion (pp. 97-131). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  3. ^ Liñán, A., & Williams, F. A. (1993). Fundamental aspects of combustion. Oxford university press.
  4. ^ Rauch, A. H., & Chelliah, H. K. (2020). On the ambiguity of premixed flame thickness definition of highly pre-heated mixtures and its implication on turbulent combustion regimes. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 24(4), 573-588.
  5. ^ Borghi, R. (1985). On the structure and morphology of turbulent premixed flames. In Recent advances in the aerospace sciences: In honor of luigi crocco on his seventy-fifth birthday (pp. 117-138). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  6. ^ Peters, N. (1988, January). Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion. In Symposium (International) on combustion (Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1231-1250). Elsevier.
  7. ^ Song, W., Hernández Pérez, F. E., & Im, H. G. (2023). Turbulent hydrogen flames: physics and modeling implications. In Hydrogen for Future Thermal Engines (pp. 237-266). Cham: Springer International Publishing.