Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia records
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Largest RfC
[edit]Is Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RFC:_The_Anti-Defamation_League in the running to be the largest RfC discussion or have there been much larger ones thanks? NadVolum (talk) 12:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not sure. But if you want you can add it to the page after the discussion gets closed. Procyon117 (talk) 18:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well it's closed now so there's that. Procyon117 (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well I put it in but I guess WP:RSN#RFC: The Telegraph on trans issues will get bigger - and that some trans issue probably already has a much bigger RfC! NadVolum (talk) 23:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well it's closed now so there's that. Procyon117 (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Longest time between edits to a page in the main namespace, excluding redirects?
[edit]Salva congruitate: October 14, 2013 – August 12, 2024: more than 10 years. Should this be added? Roasted (talk) 22:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Seems so;
added. –Gluonz talk contribs 22:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Longest without references
[edit]Blade Runner 3: Replicant Night currently holds the record for the longest time without references. It received two "references" in 2021. However, I just removed one of those as circular (the source is directly based on the Wikipedia article), and the single remaining sources says nothing about the topic (it mentions it in passing). That reference may as well not be there! As I explained on the article talk page, I am considering nominating it for deletion.
While holding a Wikipedia record clearly has no bearing on whether an article should exist, I am concerned (and curious) about what happens to that record if it were deleted. Is there precedent for this? Renerpho (talk) 10:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'd say if you can't find any other suitable references for the article, then be WP:BOLD and nominate it for deletion. If it does get deleted, it'll probably go back to the article that had that record before Blade Runner 3: Replicant Night (i.e. going through the page history to find what the previous holder was). Procyon117 (talk) 04:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Procyon117: Thanks, I've nominated it for deletion. Renerpho (talk) 07:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Procyon117: The article has been turned into a redirect. Renerpho (talk) 07:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sweet. Procyon117 (talk) 10:16, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Procyon117: The article has been turned into a redirect. Renerpho (talk) 07:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Procyon117: Thanks, I've nominated it for deletion. Renerpho (talk) 07:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
New longest redirect title
[edit]The redirect 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456 seems to be the new longest title for a redirect, hitting the character limit of 255 characters. (obviously, it's the digits of Pi) ApexParagon (talk) 02:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've just nominated this redirect for discussion. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 13#3.1415926535… for why I think it should be deleted. Renerpho (talk) 04:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)