Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-12-24/In the media
Appearance
Discuss this story
In brief
[edit]Annie interview
[edit]- Isn't the Annie Rauwerda entry just a repost of the Asterisk Mag interview from November? (Come to think of it, was that ever reported on?) Arcorann (talk) 00:43, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Arcorann: Correct, thank you for flagging it! I've just integrated a direct reference to the original interview into the blurb. Oltrepier (talk) 11:13, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- When the interview transcript says "Forum Gate" it's a misspelling of WP:FRAMGATE. Cute ;) Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 11:51, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- The interview is almost as delightful as meeting her, and at last I know which mutual friend to thank for Annie contacting me, several years ago. What, ouroboros? Is that a word? Why, yes it is! The young are supposed to learn ancient highbrow culture from the old, but vice versa can be at least as pleasant. Jim.henderson (talk) 14:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Edinburgh school blocks
[edit]- Why did they block those search engines other than Google? Google harvests more data than any other search engine. Qwant should have been offered. This is a total mistake by the schools. Ahri Boy (talk) 02:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- The Herald's article ends with a quote from the councilmember that gives a clear intention/reason, I think -
However, the site does offer a wide range of topics, some which may not be appropriate for all age groups. We have suspended access to Wikipedia at present while we undertake a further comprehensive review.
They seem to be bumping up against WP:NOTCENSORED. FifthFive (talk) 17:08, 25 December 2024 (UTC)- @FifthFive: Thank you for pointing that out. That still sounds very confusing, though... Oltrepier (talk) 15:28, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
← Back to In the media