I thought that the question #4 for the candidates, concerning "novel competition" versus slow-reacting Wikimedia entities, was a good one. High-inertia norms and procedures on EnWiki, at least, as I see it, could be holding us back. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Despite WP:BOLD, we're not very innovative. Perhaps it's because of our size, or because a determined minority (of say 10% of editors) can almost always prevent a consensus on anything. Our editors also seem to love old rules that they can argue about forever, but will never streamline the rules so that they are effective or contain something really new. Maybe competition would be good for us. Smallbones(smalltalk)19:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes more than once in a week I read in some forum or other that Wikipedia is hostile and disrespectful towards conservatism. Precisely the opposite. We are far more conservative than just about anyone I read who proudly calls themselves "conservative". Jim.henderson (talk) 01:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
← Back to News and notes