Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-04-26/Special report
Appearance
Discuss this story
- Correction: Looking at Kudpung's special report on ACREQ, the quote attributed to Espresso Addict in the body was actually written by Insertcleverphrasehere, in response to a comment by Espresso Addict in the discussion thread. (Insertcleverphrasehere favored ACREQ; Espresso Addict opposed it.) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 02:37, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- My sincere apologies for this - and to Espresso Addict, and to Insertcleverphrasehere who was one of the driving forces on the new effort to get ACTRIAL rolled out. It was a very long and complex RfC. I also got involved in the preparation of the Signpost which was a lot of work - more than some people do in the office in a week, and if I hadn't there probably wouldn't have been a new issue. We'll publish a correction in the next issue.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- This has now been fixed. A chunk of text somehow got removed (ironically probably during formatting), I will publish a correction in the next issue for the benefit of anyone else who saw it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Kudpung, and to Compassionate727 for spotting the error. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Just for anyone reading: this has now been implemented by the WMF, and is active on en.wiki. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:26, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
← Back to Special report