Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2016-04-24/Arbitration report

← Back to Arbitration report

Discuss this story

Just a small point - I do not believe that the Gamaliel arbcom case scope covers Gamergate. The clerks are removing evidence of Gamaliel's Gamergate actions. Mr Ernie (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm planning on going more into details about how the case started next issue. Especially with the sudden additions into the case. This is so far the most baffling Arbcom case I've seen since I started paying attention to them. And I've seen the GamerGate case unfold. GamerPro64 18:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

• "Kharkiv09" in the bottom-most "In brief" item appears to be a typo. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 01:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks. GamerPro64 01:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Filing party here: The case is about the Signpost posting an Wikipedia:Attack page, the alleged misconduct of its editor-in-chief over an "April's Fools joke" days after April's Fool day and the failure of the community to execute WP:BLPRESTORE. Given this was my statement on gamergate case, and the statements by arbirtrators on the current case [1], [2] make it clear this is not about gamergate, the narrative that this is some "gamergate payback" is not supported by evidence. NE Ent 10:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

• • • All of this belongs elsewhere. Montanabw^(talk) 00:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Take this to where else? This is the comments section. It's in response to what was written in the report. GamerPro64 01:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)