Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-06-10/Featured content

Discuss this story

Adam, were you smoking something when you the blurb for The Shard? Or did you write that nonsense to see if anyone actually read the paragraphs of text that get written each week about the featured pictures. I've never understood why the list of featured pictures mostly doesn't show any of the featured pictures. Since the award is for the picture rather than the subject, I can see little purpose in having lots of original text written on this page about the subject. If we are going to write anything here, shouldn't it be about how the photograph/graphic/restoration was achieved? But why not just show a gallery of all the FPs and give let the pictures speak for themselves? -- Colin°^Talk 15:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced the section with the technical details as per your suggestion. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 12:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha. That "User Notes" section in the EXIF is generated by Hugin, which is the stitching software used. It doesn't usually have strange characters in it, though, but terse specification of the projection, field-of-view and exposure levels. -- Colin°^Talk 21:41, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was some arcane notes on perspective! Anyway, well done on the stitching, especially as they were handheld! Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 21:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, achieving a stitched panorama hand-held isn't hard if everything is in the distance like here, and shutter speeds are fast enough to avoid shake. A panoramic head becomes more useful to avoid parallax errors when there are close features like pavement or indoors, or to achieve longer exposures. The biggest problem here was avoiding reflections in the glass, and correcting for the blue tint in the glass. -- Colin°^Talk 07:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]