Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-03-11/News and notes

Discuss this story

I think a more accurate title for this article would have been "Grants committee updates". Also, I would like to point out that the IEG aggregate scores and comments were aggregated and posted by a WMF employee based on the input from committee members. The aggregation wasn't done by the Committee itself unless you consider a WMF employee to be a part of the Committee. --Pine^✉ 03:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the latter concern. Thank you for your comments! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 08:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's still not right. WMF both aggregated and published the scores. Look at the page history of Meta:Grants:IEG/Committee/Workroom/Review/Scores. --Pine^✉ 18:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes - my apologies. Is it fixed to your satisfaction now? :-) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 20:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately not. The sentence "The WMF published aggregated results in early March, in which it examined a wide thematic range of applications" is still inaccurate. The Committee, not WMF, did the evaluations. WMF aggregated the evaluations and published the aggregated scores and comments. --Pine^✉ 02:18, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]