Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-12-03/News and notes

Discuss this story

A small comment (nice story :) ): to the best of my knowledge GLAM institutions didn't submit images. You are perhaps confusing images /of/ GLAM institutions that are also a monument (which is a special category this year) and images /by/ GLAM institutions? effeietsanders 19:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those looking for a mention of this in the story will not see that, at the moment: The related text has been commented out. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's unfortunate such a great image is constrained into a 180px by 180px thumbnail in a gallery. I suspect most readers will not notice the photo's quality, unless clicked on, which very few will do. Maybe there could be a larger image preview when hovering over an image in a gallery. As it stands now, nobody will be clicking on a 10 images in a gallery. It might be even better to have an Images tab, next to Read/Edit. Just some thoughts. Tomb of Safdarjung. 24.242.195.208 (talk) 17:05, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is sad indeed. However, for the article I do understand it - the article is about the tomb as a whole and not just this small part of it. But when someone writes about the chamber it should get a larger preview. effeietsanders 18:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps few people would click on all images in a gallery, but not nobody; there are compulsive clickers like me who would. (Which is why I have about 250 tabs open in my browser. Seriously. The situation is more than a bit problematic.) Waltham, The Duke of 18:47, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]