Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-06-25/Arbitration report
Discuss this story
The proposed decision dates are a joke. There's no point in mentioning them, because they're never met. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
- It might be an idea to not include the "due by" as it seems like it's forcing a deadline. But I still think an ETA is nice. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 03:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Far worse without an intended deadline. Do you not remember the bloated text and five-month cases, old-style? Tony (talk) 06:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'm just writing based on how LR used to do so. Also, the dates given are the actual deadlines IIRC. James (Talk • Contribs) • 2:14pm • 04:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Far worse without an intended deadline. Do you not remember the bloated text and five-month cases, old-style? Tony (talk) 06:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
← Back to Arbitration report