Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-04-23/Arbitration report

Discuss this story

I don't know much about the Rich Farmbrough case or its history, but when someone suggests retroactively changing the case, I get concerned. What possible reason could there be to suggest such a thing? If there's a serious problem, you {{cblank}} it. If there's only a minor problem, you ignore it. I'm just trying to make sense of this. Can anyone else enlighten me? --N Y Kevin @081, i.e. 00:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]