Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-08-23/Features and admins
Appearance
Discuss this story
- Thanks for having a more logical CotW this time. J Milburn (talk) 20:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- I like the mini-bios of admins ... a personal touch (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. It takes a lot of work for something to be listed here, and a personal touch makes it all the better. (X! · talk) · @962 · 22:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that's an excellent touch too. Another great Featured Stuff page for Signpost. Long may they continue. --bodnotbod (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'll chime in and say that i too appreciate this comprehensive format more than the strict lists of six months ago. If only we could see more of the featured pictures; I open about half of them in tabs. HereToHelp (talk to me) 17:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed- why do we have pictures illustrating TFA and others when there are featured pictures which aren't shown? J Milburn (talk) 00:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'll chime in and say that i too appreciate this comprehensive format more than the strict lists of six months ago. If only we could see more of the featured pictures; I open about half of them in tabs. HereToHelp (talk to me) 17:18, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that's an excellent touch too. Another great Featured Stuff page for Signpost. Long may they continue. --bodnotbod (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. It takes a lot of work for something to be listed here, and a personal touch makes it all the better. (X! · talk) · @962 · 22:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
←Where are the TFAs? We got rid of that a few weeks ago. Tony (talk) 00:10, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, yeah, that was a rather stupid comment. J Milburn (talk) 09:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
← Back to Features and admins