Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-03-15/Dispatches

Discuss this story

Magnificent work - confidence levels in GAs improved greatly! It's also good to know that large tasks can actually get completed! Lee∴V (talk • contribs) 12:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to commend the hard-working GA reviewers for an excellent job, but highlight a frequent problem with medical articles at GA. Many of the GA medical articles rely on primary sources, rather than secondary reviews, and do not conform to WP:MEDRS. I hope some attention can be shone on this issue by posting it here to wide readership. An explanation of how to determine PMID reviews can be found at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-30/Dispatches; I had intended to help identify the deficient medical articles during the sweeps, but was never able to complete that work. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work by everyone involved! bahamut0013^words _deeds 13:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An inspiring story, showing that progress can be made, even when we have backlogs like this. Thanks! HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 18:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]