Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-09-17/In the news
Appearance
Other mentions
[edit]Why are there two random blogs in this section? The one isn't even specific- it just says "I had my two articles deleted, these people are psychopaths."-Wafulz 02:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why not? Sure it's not "news" in the traditional sense, but I think it is useful to point to what others have been saying - I see the role of this section as a barometer of what other people think of Wikipedia. enochlau (talk) 02:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- The blogspot one is particularly vague. I get the impression we're trawling through peoples' personal rants here.-Wafulz 02:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments, and I'll definitely take them on board when I next make a selection of what to cover. enochlau (talk) 03:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- The blogspot one is particularly vague. I get the impression we're trawling through peoples' personal rants here.-Wafulz 02:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
That was not a new editor (just a rarely contributing one), nor is their complaint that they gave it a chance very convincing, as they were obviously biased from the outset.[1] Vassyana 04:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)